who is happy with their LSX block?
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: cobourg ON
who is happy with their LSX block? Im looking for some input on these blocks now there is some seriouse heads coming out for them im looking to push the limits with this block. Not sure yet of many specifics but around the 1500-2000 hp would be nice and achievable from what i understand now with all these new parts and flow numbers, just guaging peoples input on how you like your block where there many problems gettitng what you wanted done when you built your engines any info is appreciated thanks
Trending Topics
LS1Tech Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 1
From: Rockfield Kentucky
The core shift was a rumor based on what a dealer was guesing. It had to do with the changes made to the molds to solve issues during the casting process. No blocks were machined because they caught the problem in QC before they machined the blocks.
The paint deal was a "if you have a problem with overheating" thread. Funny the guy who started the thread wasn't having any problems.
It appeared that the masking didn't extend into the water passage and for some reason the powder coating was flaking. It wasn't a big issue. If your worried have your engine builder wire brush any excess powder coating.
There are a bunch of other rumors but like I posted elsewhere. I can count on one hand the amount of defective blocks that were replaced. Three is not very many when you look at how many have been sold.
Robin
The paint deal was a "if you have a problem with overheating" thread. Funny the guy who started the thread wasn't having any problems.
It appeared that the masking didn't extend into the water passage and for some reason the powder coating was flaking. It wasn't a big issue. If your worried have your engine builder wire brush any excess powder coating.
There are a bunch of other rumors but like I posted elsewhere. I can count on one hand the amount of defective blocks that were replaced. Three is not very many when you look at how many have been sold.
Robin
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: cobourg ON
i was told that these blocks arent designed well for a 440 build? im looking for a nice block and i assumed this would be the one I should use. but with a stroke of 4.125 i was told they come too far out of the cylinders as well how do the l92 blcoks compare? obviously a stupid question seeing as how tey are aluminum and not meant for 2000 hp lol
LS1Tech Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 1
From: Rockfield Kentucky
i was told that these blocks arent designed well for a 440 build? im looking for a nice block and i assumed this would be the one I should use. but with a stroke of 4.125 i was told they come too far out of the cylinders as well how do the l92 blcoks compare? obviously a stupid question seeing as how tey are aluminum and not meant for 2000 hp lol
Robin
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: cobourg ON
ok well this was sudjest to me NOT to use longer than a 4" stroke when using in a BOOST application im looking upwards of 20+ so im just triing to make sure im getting most of my info confirmed thanks alot guys
A lot of that is based on where the larger stroke moves the wrist pin placement having an effect on the available space for the rings/ring lands. Some builders prefer to have a little more wiggle room, especially if you are running higher boost.
LS1Tech Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 1
From: Rockfield Kentucky
Robin
See this thread. https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/921123-2000-hp-lsx-pics.html We have had ZERO problems with ours and we are making in the area of 2000 + horsepower
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: cobourg ON
i just PM'd worm boy I just saw that thread tonite when i got home. love the info on that build or if i could get a shortblock build somewhere.... locally Ive scared most of the builders cause they dont understand my want to be fast hahaha yah im just a kid still and dont discreadit me for that trust me I will have this built soon just need to find more people willing to show me where and how. plus the money but thats not a problem
FormerVendor
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 6
From: Houston, Tx.
We've had to do the normal machine work on all the LSX'x we've gotten so far which is no different than on any other aftermarket block, so as far as that we've had no real probems.
The cylinders are the same length as the other OEM GM LSx blocks which is around 5.500-ish plus or minus a little. The C5R and LS7 have longer bores though and can use more stroke while maintaining a normal piston.
Like Robin said you aren't going to want to go longer than 4.000 anyway in general just due to the piston you will need for a big power adder engine. You could go longer on a mostly NA deal though that didn't need a huge dish.
The cylinders are the same length as the other OEM GM LSx blocks which is around 5.500-ish plus or minus a little. The C5R and LS7 have longer bores though and can use more stroke while maintaining a normal piston.
Like Robin said you aren't going to want to go longer than 4.000 anyway in general just due to the piston you will need for a big power adder engine. You could go longer on a mostly NA deal though that didn't need a huge dish.
You are correct.. I am not having cooling issues "YET". But there is nothing funny about it. The QC on these blocks sucks!!!
I spent the time/effort correcting the problem, so hopefully I will never have an issue. BUT, it was very important to point it out to everyone. Because "IF" someone is struggling with an overheating issue, it is one thing they can look at..
I spent the time/effort correcting the problem, so hopefully I will never have an issue. BUT, it was very important to point it out to everyone. Because "IF" someone is struggling with an overheating issue, it is one thing they can look at..
The paint deal was a "if you have a problem with overheating" thread. Funny the guy who started the thread wasn't having any problems.
It appeared that the masking didn't extend into the water passage and for some reason the powder coating was flaking. It wasn't a big issue. If your worried have your engine builder wire brush any excess powder coating.
Robin
It appeared that the masking didn't extend into the water passage and for some reason the powder coating was flaking. It wasn't a big issue. If your worried have your engine builder wire brush any excess powder coating.
Robin
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 23
From: NYC
You are correct.. I am not having cooling issues "YET". But there is nothing funny about it. The QC on these blocks sucks!!!
I spent the time/effort correcting the problem, so hopefully I will never have an issue. BUT, it was very important to point it out to everyone. Because "IF" someone is struggling with an overheating issue, it is one thing they can look at..
I spent the time/effort correcting the problem, so hopefully I will never have an issue. BUT, it was very important to point it out to everyone. Because "IF" someone is struggling with an overheating issue, it is one thing they can look at..