Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

ls2 427 / 454 stroker....what heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2008, 04:06 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

N/A no n20 Drives it on the street with no problems. drove it to this show


Old 08-06-2008, 12:55 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

here is the vid of it and it is on 92 pump gas and drives it to the track!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCsdSe0G4LQ

Last edited by SIC LSX; 08-06-2008 at 03:00 PM.
Old 08-06-2008, 09:37 AM
  #23  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
68topls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WOW.. That's what I'm talking about......do you mind pm'ing me the specs on the cam / pistons (compression, etc)? That's with no nitros? WOW!
Old 08-06-2008, 09:46 AM
  #24  
DBN
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
DBN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default ls2 427 / 454 stroker....what heads?

I am running ETP LS7 heads with GM ported LS7 intake and GM LS7 ported TB on my 93 octane N/A 427. It is in a 2000 C5 with A4 transmission and has run (so far) 9.90s at 136+.
Old 08-06-2008, 02:58 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I dont no him that well just from local website and only met him once, but it has 11.7 static he said it never sees anything but 92 octane in the tank. He post that its a small cam (600 lift),non ported L92 heads...mainly GM stuff even running stock rockers and a hydraulic cam.
Old 08-06-2008, 06:33 PM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
OneQuickCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast
Posts: 395
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DBN
I am running ETP LS7 heads with GM ported LS7 intake and GM LS7 ported TB on my 93 octane N/A 427. It is in a 2000 C5 with A4 transmission and has run (so far) 9.90s at 136+.
Now that's strong. Who built the trans??? Congrats on the e.t.

LSX
Old 08-07-2008, 09:11 PM
  #27  
DBN
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
DBN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default ls2 427 / 454 stroker....what heads?

Originally Posted by OneQuickCoupe
Now that's strong. Who built the trans??? Congrats on the e.t.

LSX
Thanks. It began as an FLP Level V and was freshened up this spring by RPM.
Old 08-08-2008, 09:18 AM
  #28  
On The Tree
 
tcr98taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LSX 454 with Trickflows....like them.
Old 08-09-2008, 11:17 AM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
2000_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Webb City, MO...out in the garage
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tcr98taws6
LSX 454 with Trickflows....like them.
my inspiration

i can't wait to see how mine will perform. HKE is still waiting on my pistons to show up hopefully i'll have some dyno #'s and, more importantly, some track times in about 6 weeks
Old 08-09-2008, 12:23 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I put the trick flow 245s on mine, too.

yay. they should be here in a couple days.
Old 08-09-2008, 07:21 PM
  #31  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
68topls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whats the compression ratio on your setup? DO you spray nitros?

Originally Posted by DBN
I am running ETP LS7 heads with GM ported LS7 intake and GM LS7 ported TB on my 93 octane N/A 427. It is in a 2000 C5 with A4 transmission and has run (so far) 9.90s at 136+.
Old 08-09-2008, 09:30 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
2000_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Webb City, MO...out in the garage
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i originally wanted to run a LS7 top end, but changed my mind because it was going to be too costly and agressive for my needs, i.e. titanium valves and all that...i went with the TFS's so i could have more intake options and i toned down the cam to be more street friendly. the TFS heads produce awsome average and peak power. the LS7 may produce more peak in some cases, but they just aren't what i used.

obviously there is a lot of support for TFS on here, but there's nothing wrong the the TSP LS7's. they are a great set of heads, flow well, and aren't too costly if you don't "trick" them out. the only downfall is you have to run a stock intake or sheetmetal or a carb intake...which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just depends on what YOU are wanting to do with the car.
Old 08-09-2008, 11:24 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000_SS
i originally wanted to run a LS7 top end, but changed my mind because it was going to be too costly and agressive for my needs, i.e. titanium valves and all that...i went with the TFS's so i could have more intake options and i toned down the cam to be more street friendly. the TFS heads produce awsome average and peak power. the LS7 may produce more peak in some cases, but they just aren't what i used.

obviously there is a lot of support for TFS on here, but there's nothing wrong the the TSP LS7's. they are a great set of heads, flow well, and aren't too costly if you don't "trick" them out. the only downfall is you have to run a stock intake or sheetmetal or a carb intake...which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just depends on what YOU are wanting to do with the car.
Same thing with us, we originally thought the LS7 heads were the best option, but then it came to getting an intake and fuel system for the LS1 car it just was more feasible to go with the TFS 245's which are putting out damn good results.

We may someday change to a LS7 style topend, but I am not at all disappointed or feel like we are settling for anything by choosing a big cathedral port head/intake combination.
Old 08-11-2008, 02:25 AM
  #34  
On The Tree
 
Tavarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TFS make good heads it seems
Old 08-12-2008, 02:09 PM
  #35  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Jon@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd like to see some dyno results comparing cathedral port heads to ls7 stock & ported heads. We made 750+ flywheel horsepower in a street 454 LSX with PRC LS7 ported heads. That's more than 50rwhp over any other 427+ cube engine on our dyno. LS7 heads cost $2800 from us & about 200 for ls7 rockers. How does that compare to the cathedral heads?

PRC LS7 heads with titanium valves $2900
LS7 Rockers $199
LS7 Intake & Fuel Rail $500
TOTAL $3600
Vs.

Aftermarket Cathedral Heads $2600???
Roller Rockers Arms $450
Fast LSx Intake $800
TOTAL $3850

So basically you can build a LS7 setup with 400cfm heads for less money than it takes to buy a cathedral port head & all the stuff to make it work.

We're currently building a large runner tweaked valve angle cathedral head for production, but there's just little chance a cathedral port supports the power the LS7 head can produce.

The only way I see someone pushing a cathedral head over a LS7 style 400cfm head is because they only offer cathdral heads!!
Old 08-12-2008, 05:48 PM
  #36  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
68topls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What were the cam specs in the 454? Was it streatable.
Old 08-12-2008, 06:09 PM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jon@Texas-Speed
I'd like to see some dyno results comparing cathedral port heads to ls7 stock & ported heads. We made 750+ flywheel horsepower in a street 454 LSX with PRC LS7 ported heads. That's more than 50rwhp over any other 427+ cube engine on our dyno. LS7 heads cost $2800 from us & about 200 for ls7 rockers. How does that compare to the cathedral heads?
Funny in your own thread the car with your heads only did 610/540 rw numbers.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....49&postcount=1


While this car with TFS 235 heads did 624/578 rw numbers:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....31&postcount=1


There is dyno and condition variance to take into account though.


PRC LS7 heads with titanium valves $2900
LS7 Rockers $199
LS7 Intake & Fuel Rail $500
TOTAL $3600
Lets see your web site has them for $3,409.99 just for the heads configured to run some of the cams we are running... Then again it would be suggested to get a custom ground cam to crutch the exhaust flow numbers as well... That and you are stuck with a stock LS7 intake for that price, while you would have to fork out much more for a sheetmetal intake to take advantage of the CFM from the ported LS7 heads...


Vs.

Aftermarket Cathedral Heads $2600???
Roller Rockers Arms $450
Fast LSx Intake $800
TOTAL $3850
Ironically though, with most of the customers that run to big strokers already have some money into their LS1/LS2 cars and since these cars came with Cathedral port heads we already have 90% of the items to run big Cathedral heads. TFS does require the roller rocker setups, but we got ours for much less that $450! Also if you take into account in our case we already had a ported FAST 90/90 setup, roller rockers, and fuel rails/system and wiring harness for the EV1 injectors. I also am pleased to say we got our custom spec'd milled for 11.8:1 compression TFS 245 heads with upgraded springs for $2450 with shipping.

So basically you can build a LS7 setup with 400cfm heads for less money than it takes to buy a cathedral port head & all the stuff to make it work.

We're currently building a large runner tweaked valve angle cathedral head for production, but there's just little chance a cathedral port supports the power the LS7 head can produce.

The only way I see someone pushing a cathedral head over a LS7 style 400cfm head is because they only offer cathdral heads!!

While I agree the LS7 heads have some nice potential, and the heads offered by TSP are freaking amazing for what they are; I also believe you are just a little prone to exaggeration in this post. For instance your heads aren't flowing 400 cfm (very close at .700 lift though!), and that is definately useless with a stock LS7 intake anyway. You need a cam to maximize the LS7's potential, and you need the $880 valves and $730 springs to seriously run anything that is going to push open the LS7's to maximize that higher CFM on the intake side and conversely lesser exhaust flow anyway...

So unless you want $3400 in heads, $2800 in sheetmetal intake and throttlebody, and spend money to upgrade the fueling to feed it, then your comparison in price is just a little skewed.

For the LS7 setup we wanted we would have had to fork out $3000+ more than we paid to be able to feed our LSX 454 into the 620rwhp/550rwtq range with Cathedral port heads and our existing setup.

EDIT: BTW, I am not bashing TSP or Jon at all, they offer a very cost effective nice setup that is a real nice option; and will be even a better option when they release their 6-bolt head version!

Last edited by Azrael; 08-12-2008 at 06:22 PM.
Old 08-12-2008, 06:36 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Azrael
Funny in your own thread the car with your heads only did 610/540 rw numbers.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....49&postcount=1


While this car with TFS 235 heads did 624/578 rw numbers:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....31&postcount=1


There is dyno and condition variance to take into account though.




Lets see your web site has them for $3,409.99 just for the heads configured to run some of the cams we are running... Then again it would be suggested to get a custom ground cam to crutch the exhaust flow numbers as well... That and you are stuck with a stock LS7 intake for that price, while you would have to fork out much more for a sheetmetal intake to take advantage of the CFM from the ported LS7 heads...




Ironically though, with most of the customers that run to big strokers already have some money into their LS1/LS2 cars and since these cars came with Cathedral port heads we already have 90% of the items to run big Cathedral heads. TFS does require the roller rocker setups, but we got ours for much less that $450! Also if you take into account in our case we already had a ported FAST 90/90 setup, roller rockers, and fuel rails/system and wiring harness for the EV1 injectors. I also am pleased to say we got our custom spec'd milled for 11.8:1 compression TFS 245 heads with upgraded springs for $2450 with shipping.




While I agree the LS7 heads have some nice potential, and the heads offered by TSP are freaking amazing for what they are; I also believe you are just a little prone to exaggeration in this post. For instance your heads aren't flowing 400 cfm (very close at .700 lift though!), and that is definately useless with a stock LS7 intake anyway. You need a cam to maximize the LS7's potential, and you need the $880 valves and $730 springs to seriously run anything that is going to push open the LS7's to maximize that higher CFM on the intake side and conversely lesser exhaust flow anyway...

So unless you want $3400 in heads, $2800 in sheetmetal intake and throttlebody, and spend money to upgrade the fueling to feed it, then your comparison in price is just a little skewed.

For the LS7 setup we wanted we would have had to fork out $3000+ more than we paid to be able to feed our LSX 454 into the 620rwhp/550rwtq range with Cathedral port heads and our existing setup.

EDIT: BTW, I am not bashing TSP or Jon at all, they offer a very cost effective nice setup that is a real nice option; and will be even a better option when they release their 6-bolt head version!
Old 08-12-2008, 10:48 PM
  #39  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Jeff@TotalPerformanceEng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: "Sin City" Las Vegas
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not knocking your setup AT ALL, but you make claims of a 400cfm head.. If i'm not mistaken, thats at/around .700 lift

Thats hardly street lift territory.


I would be willing to put my car up as a test bed. I've got a freshly built LME LSx454 @ 11.81:1

I've got a set of TFS 245's in stock trim, along with a ported FAST 92, and mildly ported LS2 90mm TB.

The cam is a Comp grins 250/256 .612/.612 113+3

If you supply a set of off the shelf test heads, and an ls7 intake, we can do some back to back runs. The motor is currently out of the car, so we can easily run it on an engine dyno..

If your set performs better, I will immedialy place my heads and intake up for sale.. And prchase everything you loan..

Just a thought...


Jeff
Originally Posted by Jon@Texas-Speed
I'd like to see some dyno results comparing cathedral port heads to ls7 stock & ported heads. We made 750+ flywheel horsepower in a street 454 LSX with PRC LS7 ported heads. That's more than 50rwhp over any other 427+ cube engine on our dyno. LS7 heads cost $2800 from us & about 200 for ls7 rockers. How does that compare to the cathedral heads?

PRC LS7 heads with titanium valves $2900
LS7 Rockers $199
LS7 Intake & Fuel Rail $500
TOTAL $3600
Vs.

Aftermarket Cathedral Heads $2600???
Roller Rockers Arms $450
Fast LSx Intake $800
TOTAL $3850

So basically you can build a LS7 setup with 400cfm heads for less money than it takes to buy a cathedral port head & all the stuff to make it work.

We're currently building a large runner tweaked valve angle cathedral head for production, but there's just little chance a cathedral port supports the power the LS7 head can produce.

The only way I see someone pushing a cathedral head over a LS7 style 400cfm head is because they only offer cathdral heads!!
Old 08-13-2008, 06:15 AM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Azrael
Funny in your own thread the car with your heads only did 610/540 rw numbers.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....49&postcount=1


While this car with TFS 235 heads did 624/578 rw numbers:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....31&postcount=1


There is dyno and condition variance to take into account though.




Lets see your web site has them for $3,409.99 just for the heads configured to run some of the cams we are running... Then again it would be suggested to get a custom ground cam to crutch the exhaust flow numbers as well... That and you are stuck with a stock LS7 intake for that price, while you would have to fork out much more for a sheetmetal intake to take advantage of the CFM from the ported LS7 heads...




Ironically though, with most of the customers that run to big strokers already have some money into their LS1/LS2 cars and since these cars came with Cathedral port heads we already have 90% of the items to run big Cathedral heads. TFS does require the roller rocker setups, but we got ours for much less that $450! Also if you take into account in our case we already had a ported FAST 90/90 setup, roller rockers, and fuel rails/system and wiring harness for the EV1 injectors. I also am pleased to say we got our custom spec'd milled for 11.8:1 compression TFS 245 heads with upgraded springs for $2450 with shipping.




While I agree the LS7 heads have some nice potential, and the heads offered by TSP are freaking amazing for what they are; I also believe you are just a little prone to exaggeration in this post. For instance your heads aren't flowing 400 cfm (very close at .700 lift though!), and that is definately useless with a stock LS7 intake anyway. You need a cam to maximize the LS7's potential, and you need the $880 valves and $730 springs to seriously run anything that is going to push open the LS7's to maximize that higher CFM on the intake side and conversely lesser exhaust flow anyway...

So unless you want $3400 in heads, $2800 in sheetmetal intake and throttlebody, and spend money to upgrade the fueling to feed it, then your comparison in price is just a little skewed.

For the LS7 setup we wanted we would have had to fork out $3000+ more than we paid to be able to feed our LSX 454 into the 620rwhp/550rwtq range with Cathedral port heads and our existing setup.

EDIT: BTW, I am not bashing TSP or Jon at all, they offer a very cost effective nice setup that is a real nice option; and will be even a better option when they release their 6-bolt head version!

I just want to point out one thing. The car I have highlighted woudln't run below 2800 rpm because the cam was so big. Not saying anything either way about nothing here, but I just thought I would add that,


Quick Reply: ls2 427 / 454 stroker....what heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.