427 LT1 or LS7
LS7 has the benefit of larger valves thanks to the larger factory bore and a much bigger aftermarket.
I don't really know a whole lot about gen V stuff but I'm assuming even in highly modified form the DI and VVT can give much better street manners when paired with a big cam
Overall HP given a similar camshaft would probably net roughly the same HP. It all comes down to cost and packaging. The LS7 would be easier to swap into most if not all vehicles that are not native genV LT1.




the factory LT1 heads thereby offsetting the DI Advantages for the
track. for example a set of TFS LS7 heads ported by Tony Mamo
flow 410+ CFM @ .600" through a port smaller than 265 CCs
combined with a medium sized cam and Mammofied MSD
Intake it would annihilate the LT1 set up at the track and drive the
same or better on the street with similar cam specs and compression.
A well designed LS7 set-up will destroy a similar cammed similar compression LT1 engine....I'm talking a blow out in comparison. The LS7 cylinder heads are superior (flow more) than a ported LT1 head even in stock trim....and especially aftermarket with the right modifications.
Im not a fan of what GM did to these first Gen LT1 heads.....even ported they are so so at best (like I already mentioned, they still don't flow what an LS7 flows out of the box).
My guess is GM will come out with a radically improved design in the future (using the existing LT1 architecture....just much needed port design improvements). Honestly they will have to in an effort to stay competitive in this insane OEM fight for supremacy of late
Forget the late 60's....this is the time to be into modding cars and OEM horsepower wars.....this coming from a guy that only just missed that former era!....LOL
Awesome stuff!!

Cheers,
Tony

www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
The VVT camshaft USE is MORE effective with LOW duration lobes.
The VVT camshaft USE could/most always requires "travel" limiters to PREVENT P/V contact.
I provide such items including a "stand alone" VVT controller with Laptop GUI software at a low cost.
Lance
Anyone have any inside news if MAST will ever jump on the LT1 based performance bandwagon?
Trending Topics
SURE, I use Crower Cams as my grinder, I have my own lobes there.
THUS, my cams are aftermarket/beforemarket.
MY work is often requested by OEM's during engine development.
Yes I have done this "without" using small lobes to prevent P/V contact.
I have also done "camless" OHV development on my bench dyno. (free run engine)
Lance
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time






