Generation V External Engine LT1 Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

*WARNING* L83 5.3 with manual transmission

Old 05-25-2018, 06:43 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
71buickfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default *WARNING* L83 5.3 with manual transmission

This is not something that I have seen anywhere, and I learned the hard way.

The 5.3 crankshaft IS NOT machined to accept a manual transmission. You can install the large diameter bearing (2010 Camaro bearing), but the smaller bearing that fits on the 6.2 cranks won't work, as the crank is not bored for it.
Additionally, the depth of the crank bore is only .573" (bell flange to the inside of the crank), whereas the 6.2 cranks are 1.200" deep.

When you bolt a T56 Magnum to the 5.3 using a standard bellhousing and shim plate, there is a .25" interference. What is crazy is that you can slide all the parts together, but when you tighten down the bolts, the back of the block splits off. Ask me how I know.... All of this happened with just a ratchet, tightening the bolts in a criss-cross fashion.


I wasn't using an impact or cheater bar either. These blocks seem to be a little weak in this regard. I believe the block ear was flexing and then broke once the last bolt was tightened down.

The fix that we believe will work is a 3/8" spacer plate between the bellhousing and the transmission. I am working with a couple of companies to make this a standard offering.

I just wanted to put this information out there so that nobody will have to deal with a fractured block like I have to.
The following 3 users liked this post by 71buickfreak:
elane17 (05-30-2021), erickk120 (12-06-2020), Ls7colorado (05-17-2022)
Old 05-26-2018, 08:53 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
littlefield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Clute
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks, good to know.
Old 05-27-2018, 07:48 AM
  #3  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Good info, that sucks to see dude. Major bummer
Old 10-05-2018, 06:34 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
JLWest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post '93 Chevy Silverado 4x4 LS swap

Will this happen to me putting a LS in a '93 Chevy Silverado with a 5 speed? Just started thinking about LS swap in her, other than building a motor. The only thing that I have found is that the bell housing has to be changed to fit the motor. Have lots of questions and would greatly appreciate any help that can provided.
Old 10-05-2018, 06:40 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX-OR-USA
Posts: 2,498
Received 475 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

This is why I never use the bolts to pull the transmission to the block,,
When everything is good it should slide all the way to a solid mate,,
Unfortunately .025 would be damn hard to catch working under the car
unless you were using a feeler gauge to check.. and who would do that most of the time?
Old 10-05-2018, 06:52 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
71buickfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JLWest
Will this happen to me putting a LS in a '93 Chevy Silverado with a 5 speed? Just started thinking about LS swap in her, other than building a motor. The only thing that I have found is that the bell housing has to be changed to fit the motor. Have lots of questions and would greatly appreciate any help that can provided.
An LS should not be an issue, it is the new LT 5.3 crank that is different. I would double check your crank depth just to make sure.
Old 10-05-2018, 06:58 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
71buickfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

It is one of those things that sometimes you have to do. The dowel pins and bellhousing are brand new, they simply will not slide together by hand no matter what you do, they certainly won't do it with 150 pounds of transmission hanging off the end. It could have been an issue of powder coating in the dowel bore, or just not enough tolerance in the bore, but even after it had all been together a couple of times, it still had to be drawn together. You can get it to line up and start on the dowels, but then it just won't go any further.

Having busted the first block, believe me, it sucked. I won't lie and say my butthole wasn't puckered the entire time on the second install.

One a side note- I was able to get the block welded up, so that's good.
The following users liked this post:
Ls7colorado (05-17-2022)
Old 10-05-2018, 06:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX-OR-USA
Posts: 2,498
Received 475 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

If I'm not replacing like for like,, Its just too much easier to mock it all up on a bench..
I even have a spare bell housing for one rig that I cut big slots in so I can play with the clutch..
A BB sized piece of modeling clay on the end of the trans input shaft will work to show how much
space you have when its all slid together..
Old 10-05-2018, 07:04 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
71buickfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Oh yeah, it is lesson learned. Problem is that nobody knew it was a potential issue. A minor change for the factory, but it is big freaking deal to guys like us. Very few people check input shaft to crank clearance, there is typically .5 to .75" of clearance, it just isn't an issue on known applications. The LT1, LT4, and L86 are all no problem. The L83 5.3 is an issue because the 5.3 will never see a factory-installed manual. I would be willing to bet the V6 is the same way, and I think that V6 will catch on for small engine-bay applications.
Old 10-05-2018, 07:08 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX-OR-USA
Posts: 2,498
Received 475 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

Yep,, I'd be surprised if they don't go to cone engagement on the back of GM cranks in the next couple years..

I've considered the Newest gen 4.3 for my Jeep, the V6 would leave a lot of room and comes with the 8 Speed.. 300 Hp wouldn't suck..

Last edited by pdxmotorhead; 10-05-2018 at 07:14 PM.
Old 10-08-2018, 09:20 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
rpierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got extremely lucky. I bought my L83 and T56 back in April but was too busy to get to everything until a few weeks ago. Luckily I keep reading up on swaps and was up at 11PM one night and caught your post on Hotrod.

Somebody's gotta be the one to find out when doing a new swap, and I'm extremely grateful that you documented it.

Also as far as pulling the trans on with the bolts, I had to do that a liiiiittle bit with my setup because I have a McLeod twin disk. The extra disk just makes it slightly harder to get together if they aren't 100% lined up.
Old 02-14-2019, 04:16 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
NoRotor88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Has anyone tried the Quicktime RM-6023 (SBC to Magnum) bellhousing? It has 0.395" more depth than the RM-8020 (LS & LT to Magnum).

Jesse
Old 04-09-2019, 12:51 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
Bapeon4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: San Jose
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is it the same results running a tr6060???
Old 04-16-2019, 12:09 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
Flame-Thrower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow. the problem with FEA (finite element analysis) design is that if a part is not designed to be stressed in a certain way, it's not strong in that way. This is an amazing example of that very problem. a block out of a SBC would never break like this. not that i have ever seen.
Old 06-20-2019, 07:14 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
chuckd71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nashville / Tampa
Posts: 1,760
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Sort of on topic since the Hot Rod article was mentioned - does anyone know the right part number for the smaller bearing one would use with a T56 and a 6.2? Is it just the same pilot bearing as the older 1998-2002 Camaros? The article says use the smaller one, but I'm not 100% sure which one that is.

And do you guys think these blocks are too weak to handle being mounted to a frame stand using two of those lower holes in the thinner material?
Thanks
Old 06-25-2019, 09:13 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
gagliano7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Monroe,NY
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JLWest
Will this happen to me putting a LS in a '93 Chevy Silverado with a 5 speed? Just started thinking about LS swap in her, other than building a motor. The only thing that I have found is that the bell housing has to be changed to fit the motor. Have lots of questions and would greatly appreciate any help that can provided.
I have the same setup in a 1992 silverado.Been there since 2013 you will be fine. The LT motor is what the OP is talking about.
Old 06-30-2019, 10:44 AM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
John B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,248
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Sometimes it just absolutely sucks being the Pioneer but thank God you're the kind of guy to share for the benefit of others and extremely glad to hear that you've got it repaired!
Old 11-23-2019, 09:54 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
97camer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

makes me think that puting any eng.-trans together put afeeler gauge between the bellhouseings to make sure they are tight together
Old 05-17-2022, 12:30 AM
  #19  
Teching In
 
Dpredki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 4
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default 3/8" thick spacer required

This spacer/adapter is a must

for the 5.3lt and tremec manual 5speed / 6speed combination to work and avoid catastrophe. Also need to use a 2010 Camaro SS pilot bearing. Spec also makes nice billet / steel flywheels for this combination. You can thank me in advance 😁
The following 5 users liked this post by Dpredki:
G Atsma (05-17-2022), JeffFro (07-05-2023), John B (05-17-2022), Ls7colorado (05-17-2022), MikeA.Tango^2 (06-21-2022)
Old 05-17-2022, 12:35 AM
  #20  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
71buickfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I prefer to space the trans from the bellhousing, but there are a couple of ways to skin this cat. And yes, you definitely need the Large Camaro bearing, and you usually have to hone the crank a little to get the bearing to actually fit. GM did not do much finish work on the 5.3 cranks, so they do take a little finnessing.
The following users liked this post:
Dpredki (05-17-2022)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: *WARNING* L83 5.3 with manual transmission



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.