Generation V Internal Engine 2013-20xx LT1

Double vs single thrust bearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2024 | 06:20 PM
  #1  
Xlexustech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default Double vs single thrust bearing

LT engines form the factory come with a threst bearing on the block only. My bearing kit came with one for the block and the cap. It also came with a flat bearing for the cap.
Which is better to use the 1/2 thrust (block only) or Full Block and Cap?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2024 | 05:57 PM
  #2  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 5,088
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Post pictures please. I’m not following what your saying….
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2024 | 06:19 PM
  #3  
Xlexustech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

If you are familiar with the LT engine. The factory has a thrust bearing in the block and a standard bearing in the Maincap #3. The bearing kit came with and extra standard bearing and two block and Cap thrust bearings. Apperianlty you can run them both ways. in picture of block #3 has the thrust bearing in the block.. the question is.. run this same bearing in the cap. or the std bearing like in 1,2,4,5



Reply
Old Apr 23, 2024 | 10:25 PM
  #4  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 5,088
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

If given the chance, I’d always run the thrust bearing on the cap also. A big power engine, in front of a big converter or a stiffer than stock pressure plate on a clutch, is hard on the thrust surface.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2024 | 10:03 AM
  #5  
LS1Formulation's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,813
Likes: 1,095
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Default

My guess is GM only used half to try to cut down on frictional losses, not for any other reason. I'd also want the full thrust surface on a modified engine.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2024 | 03:08 PM
  #6  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,285
Likes: 3,613
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by LS1Formulation
My guess is GM only used half to try to cut down on frictional losses, not for any other reason. I'd also want the full thrust surface on a modified engine.
That is the ONLY possible reason for doing that, and I think it's a half-*** way to do it. GM does GM....
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.