15.2 in a modded 5.o

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 19, 2006 | 04:48 PM

#21

HAMRHEAD

10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,846

Likes: 0

From: Milwaukee, WI

Get the LS1 and don't look back, cause you'll just see the mustangs behind you

Seriously Mustangs are nice too but the LSX engines are great!

Dec 20, 2006 | 01:23 PM

#22

highwaywonderland

On The Tree

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 131

Likes: 0

From: Ohio

Welcome, you'll never regret getting an LS1.

Dec 20, 2006 | 01:38 PM

#23

BLKWS.6

Banned

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 2,636

Likes: 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by slick1851

No there not, your just a sucker and bought all the wrong parts that are horried for those cars!

A nice after market set of heads, and a nice cam and they move out well!

Meh, all I bought was an engine and a tranny and some suspension. The company had made hundreds of hte motors and said I should run low 13's. Screw me for beliving a company that had been around for a quarter of a century

Yeah, I still dispise the old 5.0, lol, but it is a FUN car and it makes power up to 6K and keeps on making it! insane! its like a little 4-banger, lol.

Dec 20, 2006 | 01:39 PM

#24

BLKWS.6

Banned

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 2,636

Likes: 2

In all honesty, the mustang was okay for what it is, the LS1 is just better across the board. (except for the rear end).

Dec 21, 2006 | 04:07 PM

#25

blake110106

TECH Regular

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 429

Likes: 0

From: Bremen, Ky

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6

In all honesty, the mustang was okay for what it is, the LS1 is just better across the board. (except for the rear end).

yeah the rears sucks ***** man. thats the dumbest thing GM ever did is the 7.5 behind a 300+hp car. hell thats what 4cyl mustang have in them lol and all v8 stang have an 8.8 rear.

Dec 22, 2006 | 11:31 AM

#26

bene

Trunion King

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 4,394

Likes: 3

From: Texan in Colorado

Quote:

Originally Posted by fastman5.0

think i might go for ls1 now

That can't be right. My former 2K 3.8 v6 firebird ran 14.7 @ 96 MPH peg legging it w/ 2.2 60'. Mods were 3" catback/lid/FRA.

Dec 22, 2006 | 04:00 PM

#27

z28convert

12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 646

Likes: 0

From: Eastern, CT

Quote:

That can't be right. My former 2K 3.8 v6 firebird ran 14.7 @ 96 MPH peg legging it w/ 2.2 60'. Mods were 3" catback/lid/FRA.

I agree, thats just not right....

Dec 22, 2006 | 07:16 PM

#28

BLKWS.6

Banned

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 2,636

Likes: 2

Hell, my car went 14.3@97.54 with a 2.15 and I had heads (GT40P), Cam (X303), 4.10's and FULL bolt-ons with a 5-speed. Mustangs arent cool NA. (not the 2V variety at least).