LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

slicks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 08:28 PM
  #21  
CenTexSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, Texas.
Default

Originally Posted by smokin06impala ss
Good luck man. My tranny shifts pretty strong at 71K (knock on wood) but then again i bought it with 56K dont know the past history .

Do you have any baseline 1/4 mile times to compare to when you run these MT's?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #22  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by CenTexSS
Do you have any baseline 1/4 mile times to compare to when you run these MT's?
Well my best 1/4 mile time is 14.51 but without the tunning and cai. When I take to the track I'm going to do a comparision street tires vs slicks to see how much of a difference it makes.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #23  
StealthV8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by CenTexSS
I'm pretty sure you can find many members with transmission failures, even ones that don't beat on their car.

If you read my post i'm talking about the difference between 05s trans and the 06 and up trans. Some people say the trans or ecm/tcm is different and i have not seen info to prove this.

I know there is a lot of transmission failures, which is why in my other post just below i say we don't have the best transmissions.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #24  
ImpSS07's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by StealthV8
If you read my post i'm talking about the difference between 05s trans and the 06 and up trans. Some people say the trans or ecm/tcm is different and i have not seen info to prove this.

I know there is a lot of transmission failures, which is why in my other post just below i say we don't have the best transmissions.
You're also comparing the GXP's. The OP has an SS, although are cars are the "same" they are still different.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #25  
07MCSS's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Originally Posted by smokin06impala ss
Good luck man. My tranny shifts pretty strong at 71K (knock on wood) but then again i bought it with 56K dont know the past history .
I turned my car in Friday for transmission repairs. They are going to tear it apart on Monday. I have the option of getting 3.69 gears from the Chevy Uplander. Should I or should I not. I have a tuner who will fix any issues associated with the gear ratio change. It would definitely rpm quicker and I could use third gear in the quarter. I need opinions before Monday evening.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #26  
TheMonteMan's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

i wouldnt go with the 3.69s its hard enough to hook as is.they dont have 3.29s available?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #27  
StealthV8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by ImpSS07
You're also comparing the GXP's. The OP has an SS, although are cars are the "same" they are still different.
where can you show me the proof that there is any diference in drivetrain and ecm/tem? I just want proof because on the build sheets they are the same drivetrains (other than tap-****) and same computers throught out the years and differnt ls4 cars.

suspension, brakes, body and interior are different but the rest is the same.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 05:14 AM
  #28  
07MCSS's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Originally Posted by TheMonteMan
i wouldnt go with the 3.69s its hard enough to hook as is.they dont have 3.29s available?

They do. This is probably a once in a lifetime situation for me though. I will most likely do it.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #29  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

What psi should I put on the slicks?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #30  
CenTexSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, Texas.
Default

I'd start at 25psi or so. Then go down in pressure as needed for traction.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #31  
CooterXJ's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Ft Stewart, GA
Default

Originally Posted by CenTexSS
I'm pretty sure you can find many members with transmission failures, even ones that don't beat on their car.


I'm a little cautious, even though I have plenty of warranty.
Go over to ClupGP and GPONA forums in the GXP sections and this is what you will find. There could be all kinds of reasons why alot have a problem and dont beat on there cars but you will find a few that do and dont have a problem (but those arent the norm).
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #32  
CooterXJ's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Ft Stewart, GA
Default

Originally Posted by StealthV8
where can you show me the proof that there is any diference in drivetrain and ecm/tem? I just want proof because on the build sheets they are the same drivetrains (other than tap-****) and same computers throught out the years and differnt ls4 cars.

suspension, brakes, body and interior are different but the rest is the same.
tap Shift requires different software/tune in the tem. has to be to allow manual shifting.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #33  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by CenTexSS
I'd start at 25psi or so. Then go down in pressure as needed for traction.
Thanks CenTexSS I noitced you have some BFs how well do those hook? I have the same ones but have problems hooking even dropping the air pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 06:27 PM
  #34  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

Well I put on the slicks this afternoon to get a feel when I go to the track this wednesday if it dont rain then went on one of the back roads to try them out. First I just gave little spin, stalled at 2500rpm ,and slightly hammered it. Man it felt good to not spin!! I did it again , stall at 2500, and slightly hammered a little more than the first time, felt even better no wheel spin. Yes I know at the track its different but just wanted to get a feel!!! The only thing I didnt like was that once i reach 60mph the car starts shaking a little. They did balance the tires, don't know if they did it right or if its normal for it to do that. tires were @ 25psi.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #35  
Haastile's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Default

Slicks get out of balance quickly because of the tire deformation they have due to the soft sidewalls. It's pretty much a waste to balance a slick.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #36  
CenTexSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, Texas.
Default

What wheels are you using?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 08:55 AM
  #37  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by CenTexSS
What wheels are you using?
They are from a 99 grand prix.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #38  
smokin06impala ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Mission,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Haastile
Slicks get out of balance quickly because of the tire deformation they have due to the soft sidewalls. It's pretty much a waste to balance a slick.
So its better not to balance them at all?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #39  
CenTexSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, Texas.
Default

Originally Posted by smokin06impala ss
Thanks CenTexSS I noitced you have some BFs how well do those hook? I have the same ones but have problems hooking even dropping the air pressure.
My BFG street tires don't hook up so well. They're decent for an allseason tire, but not for all out performance. But on a well prepped track, they still have netted me 2.11 60 foots.

I now have 255/50/16 BFG Drag Radials. I've gotten 2.06 60 foots at a lesser prepped track with 25psi and a small burnout. At my local track, I've only gotten a best of 2.27 on the street tires, and a 2.16 on the DR's due to lack of prep.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #40  
CenTexSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, Texas.
Default

Originally Posted by smokin06impala ss
So its better not to balance them at all?

A good balance can't hurt. With my old Civic, I trapped 105-106mph on MT slicks and didn't have any issues with steering wheel shimmy.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.