Question for you cam guroos...........
#21
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 805-818
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You may want to sit down and see how much gas you can buy with the money you'll spend on buying and insuring a second car, and how long before you'll break even.
And I'm guessing the other half of you just wants to hot rod anything you drive, including your lawn tractor if you have one.
And I'm guessing the other half of you just wants to hot rod anything you drive, including your lawn tractor if you have one.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
Most likely I'll just keep the MC for DD duty and then fear possible tranny replacements in the future.
#22
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LITH, IL.
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@NMP went rummaging around this internet place and found this test graph of constant duration/varied LSA: http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...ual_plane.html
They don't start the pull until 2500, but theory says the tighter LSA should make more power all the way down to just above idle (and certainly well below the stall speed of our t/c's.)
They don't start the pull until 2500, but theory says the tighter LSA should make more power all the way down to just above idle (and certainly well below the stall speed of our t/c's.)
#23
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice article, and it definitely illustrates a case where widening the LSA just kills power and doesn't buy anything usable on the top or bottom. That's the problem with speaking in generalities; you are always going to be wrong for some cases. In the text they call out two important points. First, they ran into valve float before the wider LSA would have helped the powerband hang on. Second, they point out that a smaller cam (that was in the 250's for advertised duration) would have shown better the advantages of a wider LSA. But for this case, you are right that its better to just go smaller than widen the LSA to tame the engine.
Anyway, I like something in the 111-113 with about 220 degrees advertised for our engines too. My engine only operates below 2000rpm when cruising at low speeds on level ground. Once the TCC unlocks, the engine tends to rev to around 3000rpm. If you have a fairly loose stall and don't want to spin your engine really high (which requires more expensive parts) you will get better performance with a tight LSA.
Given that, I still have Jesse's Car Craft where they pick up about 50HP with that GT2-3 cam in a 5.3. I'll put up the numbers when I get back from visiting family this weekend. I also think you'll see pretty good mileage with that cam. It may not be the best choice, but its a good cam.
Anyway, I like something in the 111-113 with about 220 degrees advertised for our engines too. My engine only operates below 2000rpm when cruising at low speeds on level ground. Once the TCC unlocks, the engine tends to rev to around 3000rpm. If you have a fairly loose stall and don't want to spin your engine really high (which requires more expensive parts) you will get better performance with a tight LSA.
Given that, I still have Jesse's Car Craft where they pick up about 50HP with that GT2-3 cam in a 5.3. I'll put up the numbers when I get back from visiting family this weekend. I also think you'll see pretty good mileage with that cam. It may not be the best choice, but its a good cam.
#25
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#26
On The Tree
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems like not many guys have cammed these cars?
I like the cam Mixerda chose but wonder if you could go just a tad bigger? How would I find out what the most you can do w/o issues but yet keep drivability?
New to the LS4 stuff sorry
I like the cam Mixerda chose but wonder if you could go just a tad bigger? How would I find out what the most you can do w/o issues but yet keep drivability?
New to the LS4 stuff sorry
![Hail](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_hail.gif)
#27
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Highland, MI
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
that depends if you want to keep your DOD or not, if you do your options are pretty limited. If not, your driveablity will probably go before you run into problems. As far as standard cam choices go, you can run pretty much anything the other LS engines run, save for a few exceptions.
#29
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OK, so here's the numbers on this cam from CarCraft, using a very similar engine (except for the intake, which is much better than ours). They were running dyno headers too, and they went with Comp 918s once they upped the cam.
Stock LQE (300HP, 9.45:1 All Aluminum 5.3L used in the SSR):
Intake: Stock Truck
Heads: Stock (1.89 intake, 1.55 exhaust)
Cam: Stock (190/190, 114LSA, .456"/.464")
HP: 323@5200
TRQ: 355@4000
TRQ @2000RPM: 318
Vacuum: probably about 24" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT2-3
Intake: Stock Truck
Heads: Stock (1.89 intake, 1.55 exhaust)
Cam: GT2-3 (206/220, 118.5LSA, .571"/.578")
HP: 378@6000
TRQ: 366@4800
TRQ @2000RPM: 308 (less than stock until 3300RPM)
Vacuum: 20.7" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT1-1
Intake: Stock
Heads: Stock
Cam: GT1-1 (229/242, 114.5LSA, .631"/.631")
HP: 413@6600
TRQ: 369@4800
TRQ @2000RPM: 281 (less than stock until 4300RPM)
Vacuum: 10" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT1-1, LSX Intake, Ported Heads
Intake: Comp Cams LSX
Heads: Ported Stockers (2.00 intake, 1.55 exhaust, bump to 10:1 compression)
Cam: GT1-1 (229/242, 114.5LSA, .631"/.631")
HP: 458@6600
TRQ: 392@5800
TRQ @2000RPM: 294 (less than stock until 3200RPM)
Vacuum: probably still 10" of mercury at idle
Notice when the compression comes up and the intake/heads match the cam in being aggressive, you pick up a lot of the midrange that was lost when just the cam was too big.
Here's a link to the second article in the series. You can read about them upgrading the injectors to match the big engine too:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html
Stock LQE (300HP, 9.45:1 All Aluminum 5.3L used in the SSR):
Intake: Stock Truck
Heads: Stock (1.89 intake, 1.55 exhaust)
Cam: Stock (190/190, 114LSA, .456"/.464")
HP: 323@5200
TRQ: 355@4000
TRQ @2000RPM: 318
Vacuum: probably about 24" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT2-3
Intake: Stock Truck
Heads: Stock (1.89 intake, 1.55 exhaust)
Cam: GT2-3 (206/220, 118.5LSA, .571"/.578")
HP: 378@6000
TRQ: 366@4800
TRQ @2000RPM: 308 (less than stock until 3300RPM)
Vacuum: 20.7" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT1-1
Intake: Stock
Heads: Stock
Cam: GT1-1 (229/242, 114.5LSA, .631"/.631")
HP: 413@6600
TRQ: 369@4800
TRQ @2000RPM: 281 (less than stock until 4300RPM)
Vacuum: 10" of mercury at idle
LQE with LPE GT1-1, LSX Intake, Ported Heads
Intake: Comp Cams LSX
Heads: Ported Stockers (2.00 intake, 1.55 exhaust, bump to 10:1 compression)
Cam: GT1-1 (229/242, 114.5LSA, .631"/.631")
HP: 458@6600
TRQ: 392@5800
TRQ @2000RPM: 294 (less than stock until 3200RPM)
Vacuum: probably still 10" of mercury at idle
Notice when the compression comes up and the intake/heads match the cam in being aggressive, you pick up a lot of the midrange that was lost when just the cam was too big.
Here's a link to the second article in the series. You can read about them upgrading the injectors to match the big engine too:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html
Last edited by nmp0098; 04-15-2010 at 11:56 AM. Reason: missed one test
#31
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here's a link to the second article in the series. You can read about them upgrading the injectors to match the big engine too:
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html
I can't wait to see the results from the camshaft swaps (along with the intakes).
By the way, isn't the SSR engine known as the "LM4?"
#33
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
10" Hg of manifold vacuum at idle will make your car very un street-able. That is a bull **** cam and for dynos and track use only. Have fun with your restrictive intake, small tubed air intake piping, shorty headers with a single 3" collector. Small valve heads, small bore and stupid gearing. Peak HP at 6700rpm will require a 7200rpm shift point. Waste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#34
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
![Question](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
What do you guys think about Lunati cams?
I've been looking into two of there cams...
Duration
In:204
Ex:214
Lift
In: .420"
Ex: .443"
Lope is 112,and the power band is 1000-5000
Or
Duration
In:214
Ex:224
Lift
In: .443"
Ex: .465"
Lope is 112,and power band is 1500-5500
I'm still learning about cams and wanted to get your guys input,thanks.
Dom
****EDIT****
Part # for first cam listed 10000LK
Part # for second cam listed 10001LK
I've been looking into two of there cams...
Duration
In:204
Ex:214
Lift
In: .420"
Ex: .443"
Lope is 112,and the power band is 1000-5000
Or
Duration
In:214
Ex:224
Lift
In: .443"
Ex: .465"
Lope is 112,and power band is 1500-5500
I'm still learning about cams and wanted to get your guys input,thanks.
Dom
****EDIT****
Part # for first cam listed 10000LK
Part # for second cam listed 10001LK
Last edited by 1CL3ANSUP3RSPORT; 06-26-2010 at 11:08 AM. Reason: add part numbers
#35
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think those are lunati ls cams.
http://www.lunatipower.com/ProductGr...?id=288&cid=60
Part 60510 is the smallest with a .531 lift.
http://www.lunatipower.com/ProductGr...?id=288&cid=60
Part 60510 is the smallest with a .531 lift.
#37
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the easiest way to get started is to look through a catalog, pick the duration to fit the power band that you want, and then get as much lift as the rest of your valvetrain can handle. Much over 0.6" and you'll want to go with dual springs and aftermarket rockers, but under that upgraded beehives and the stock rockers should be fine. There's a ton of things that go into cam design, but that's why most people buy pre-made cams from respected grinders. Whoever you buy your cam from should be able to tell you what else needs to be changed to handle the cam. If they can't, don't buy it.
#38
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am considering replacing my Corvair engine with an LM4 aluminum block engine. The only issue is engine rotation. The Corvair engine rotates in the opposite direction. What is involved to change the rotation of the LM4 engine to match the Corvair rotation? I would be bolting the engine to a 1964 Corvair transaxle. I am also concerned about torque. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
#39
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LITH, IL.
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would suggest you don't do it. My buddies 'vair twisted the stock frame with it's puny stock air- cooled 6. I can't imagine what would be needed to make it live with 300+ lb-ft.
#40
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am considering replacing my Corvair engine with an LM4 aluminum block engine. The only issue is engine rotation. The Corvair engine rotates in the opposite direction. What is involved to change the rotation of the LM4 engine to match the Corvair rotation? I would be bolting the engine to a 1964 Corvair transaxle. I am also concerned about torque. Any suggestions would be appreciated.