Mufflers
no real numbers but i could tell a difference throught the rpm band, not sure if that way hp or just from weight savings.
that was my 2nd attempt at exhaust, my first attempt i put some strait pipes in where the stock mufflers were but didnt like the sound. it had that truck with a glass pack sound, was really bad dod kicked in.
Trending Topics
I decided I am getting BORLA mufflers next week, I haven't heard a GXP with Borlas and I am hoping they sound badass! If anybody has a link to a 5.3 with borlas, it would be appreciated.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I've got a Flowmaster on my Camaro. Got it for free from my buddy's shop. Had it welded in because the LM1 exhaust was just too much. Definitely noticed a loss in performance, but it all comes back when I open the cutout.
To me, it's the most overrated muffler you can buy. I have no issue with people who like the sound of a Flowmaster, but for performance, they suck.
And as long as the Flowmaster name is around, there will be people who will buy them no matter how much power they lose.
And once the Camaro is done and is retuned on the dyno, I'll make sure we do a run with the cutout closed so we can see how much power lost. it's not the same as comparing muffler to muffler, but it will give a good indicator.
Anyway, from my understanding, the Flowmasters use an older chambered design that sounds good, but also costs power. There are several threads in the Gen III section of LS1tech that discuss it. Most other performance mufflers use a straight-through design that flows better. There are a few dyno sheets floating around that show anywhere from an 8-12 HP loss when comparing Flowmaster to Magnaflow.
For my money, Magnaflow is the way to go in terms of power, though I do like the Spintechs on my Impala:
http://youtu.be/M9IHK6dVQmo?hd=1


