LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

need headers so confused

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2008, 11:02 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
z28rob18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: hamilton nj
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ive got the slp mid tubes and y pipe and idk how much i gained wen i did the full exhaust but it was very noticable and dropped some time at the track
Old 11-05-2008, 11:07 AM
  #22  
TECH Resident
 
EliteCamaro94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

everyone i have known with long tubes have said that they felt they had more top end power rather than low end. my buddy had a 91 z28 and added hooker super comp headers ory and a borla adj. catback and he dropped from a 14.1 to a 13.7 in the quarter and he also started beating other guys cars on the top end on the freeway that he previously had lost too in freeway runs. He said the car felt way more powerful in the higher rpms.
Old 11-05-2008, 11:09 AM
  #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EliteCamaro94
everyone i have known with long tubes have said that they felt they had more top end power rather than low end. my buddy had a 91 z28 and added hooker super comp headers ory and a borla adj. catback and he dropped from a 14.1 to a 13.7 in the quarter and he also started beating other guys cars on the top end on the freeway that he previously had lost too in freeway runs. He said the car felt way more powerful in the higher rpms.
just wait till you take a ride in my car now after i let everything settle in for a couple days, i can tell up top it wants to just fly man its crazy! plus i love my flowmasters that everyone hates soo much
Old 11-05-2008, 11:15 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PNYKLR-TA
i am almost 100% positive you have this backwards, i just installed my long tubes and got my exhaust welded up and it feels slower from about idle to 2500rpms but much faster from their on up.

i think long tubes moves your peak torque up and shorties will move it down. mids obviously keep it in the mid section.

Originally Posted by David Vizard
To predict what primary size will be best for a specific motor, you must know where you want the engine to develop peak torque. If the existing torque peak is at a bit lower RPM than you prefer (typical in under-cammed or stock motors), it can be "bumped" a bit by increasing the primary diameter. If the torque peak is too high (motor is "peaky", with no range and poor recovery from gear changes), the peak can be adjusted down by using a smaller pipe. A change of 1/8" in the primary diameter will raise or lower the peak torque RPM by 500 or so.

This factor slightly overlaps the effect of primary pipe length, but the pipe length generally will not change the peak torque or the RPM at which it occurs. A length change has the effect of improving the torque on only 1 side of the peak by "borrowing" it from the other side. A shorter pipe improves the torque after the peak (reduces it at lower RPM), preventing the curve from flattening out so quickly as speed increases. A longer pipe extends the torque curve backwards to improve the engine's flexibility, at the expense of after-peak torque.
I had a feeling I'd see a response (or three) like this one, which is why I said "all other things being equal."

You felt like you lost low end torque, (and you did), when you switched to long tube headers because the primary diameter in the headers is significantly larger than that of stock exhaust manifolds. The larger primary diameter raised the torque peak.

If we're going to compare apples to apples, (two exhaust headers that have equal width primaries), then the one with the longer tube will have more of the torque under the curve stacked below the peak every time.
Old 11-05-2008, 11:15 AM
  #25  
TECH Resident
 
EliteCamaro94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PNYKLR-TA
just wait till you take a ride in my car now after i let everything settle in for a couple days, i can tell up top it wants to just fly man its crazy! plus i love my flowmasters that everyone hates soo much
yeah dude totally cant wait to see how she runs, i guess my stock z28 wont be givin you a little trouble on the freeway anymore huh lol. As for the flowmaster i like the sound if your wanting a mellow tone for driving and idle but you know me im all about loudass rasp and screamin so its either gonna be the gmmg for me or the slp loudmouth 1.
Old 11-05-2008, 11:32 AM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
I had a feeling I'd see a response (or three) like this one, which is why I said "all other things being equal."

You felt like you lost low end torque, (and you did), when you switched to long tube headers because the primary diameter in the headers is significantly larger than that of stock exhaust manifolds. The larger primary diameter raised the torque peak.

If we're going to compare apples to apples, (two exhaust headers that have equal width primaries), then the one with the longer tube will have more of the torque under the curve stacked below the peak every time.
very good point! didnt see that little end note with all things equal you sneak motha!

so if the primaries were the same diameter and the length was just increased it would give more low end torque? thats interesting to know.
Old 11-05-2008, 01:55 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
LT1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, Id
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Fu?? it

im going to cut through all the red tape and use my stock system for emmissions testing then take it off and put Lt's and an offroad y pipe on.yeh it's a little annoying having to do all that work each year. but it will save the headache of having to find an emmisions legal LT setup. and some money. the non emmisions set ups are a lot cheaper
Old 11-05-2008, 02:14 PM
  #28  
BTC
TECH Fanatic
 
BTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,745
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I think I would rather move to a non-emissions state, or spring for an emissions legal setup, than swap from headers, to stock manifolds, back to headers every year. If you have a nice garage, with a lift, it might not be so bad, but dang. I dread waxing my Jeep once each year before winter.
Old 11-05-2008, 07:06 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1SS
im going to cut through all the red tape and use my stock system for emmissions testing then take it off and put Lt's and an offroad y pipe on.yeh it's a little annoying having to do all that work each year. but it will save the headache of having to find an emmisions legal LT setup. and some money. the non emmisions set ups are a lot cheaper
$250 shipped to your door would get you at least some form of header, completely emissions legal/ gaskets/ hardware/ and fittings. Without having to do alllllllllllllll of that work every year.

Or find yourself a "friendly" inspector and put on LT's.
Old 11-05-2008, 10:09 PM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
1996camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know what you mean about l/t's they are so easy to scrape......



Quick Reply: need headers so confused



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.