LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

GM847 track times/dyno #s???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #41  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

So back to my first post, you should not have asked because you wont listen to any input anyway. You came here to have your ego stroked over a poor choice, not for infomation.

Typical kid, think you know more than the guys who have been there done that.
"bigger is better" is the oldest mistake in hotrodding, still alive and well.

Again I see one guy in this thread who actually used it, and used it sucessfully and even he is telling you not to, how thick do you have to be to ignore input like that???
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #42  
3rdgen92maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo,Fl/Fairbanks,AK
Default

typical kid thats funny. actually theres more then one person who has used that cam and he said he couldnt be happier with it. i made this thread to see what dyno/track numbers people are getting not for people to sway my decision on my cam choice.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #43  
Razor_Blade's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 3rdgen92maro
ill let yall know how it goes come spring time when the snow melts
I hope it works out for you! Let us know how it does. I'm always interested in how different combos perform.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #44  
3rdgen92maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo,Fl/Fairbanks,AK
Default

ill keep everyone updated on how it runs. only 3 more months of snow
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #45  
blackz93's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 1
From: nc
Default

Haven't ran mine at the track yet, but it does drive and run good. No loss(noticeable) of low-end torque.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #46  
3rdgen92maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo,Fl/Fairbanks,AK
Default

Originally Posted by blackz93
Haven't ran mine at the track yet, but it does drive and run good. No loss(noticeable) of low-end torque.
is yours in a stock short block?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #47  
blackz93's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 1
From: nc
Default

Negative. But that doesn't affect the way it drives.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #48  
3rdgen92maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo,Fl/Fairbanks,AK
Default

we shall see...hopefully some 11s slips will be in the near future
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #49  
trump167's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

847 will be a good choice. i ran it on a 355 with lt4's made 399/387
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #50  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 7
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

with stock heads the gm847 will dyno around 325-335rwhp in a stalled auto or around 350-360rwhp with a t56

usually traps anywhere from 111-113mph

smaller cams that abuse the valvetrain less, drive better, and get better gas mileage with the same performance in a stock headed car are available though
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #51  
fireman's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
with stock heads the gm847 will dyno around 325-335rwhp in a stalled auto or around 350-360rwhp with a t56
Yup.

Originally Posted by myltwon
usually traps anywhere from 111-113mph
I'd say up to 115mph with a 6spd.

Originally Posted by myltwon
maller cams that abuse the valvetrain less, drive better, and get better gas mileage with the same performance in a stock headed car are available though
What smaller cam does around 360rwhp with stock heads?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 08:57 AM
  #52  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 7
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

well considering my (cc503) stalled auto(unlocked), 130k+ mile motor with midlengths and magnaflow catback dyno'd 325rwhp. I saw examples of gm847 dyno numbers (i.e. - saw one guy with lt's, 3" duals x pipe, stalled auto, newer motor) dyno only 10 more rwhp I figured if the cc503 dyno's around the same as a gm847 through a stalled why couldn't it replicate that through a t56

also there's a plethora of custom grinds out there that outperform off the shelf cams all day
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #53  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 7
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Originally Posted by fireman
I'd say up to 115mph with a 6spd.
I've yet to see it but I won't say it's impossible

considering your average full bolt on LS1 is good for mid 300's and traps usually 112-113 and a cammed 6 speed LT1 is good for around the same power then traps should be equivilent
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #54  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
I've yet to see it but I won't say it's impossible
Maybe a one-off, but certainly not common-place. 115 from a cam-only LT1 is very rare, with perhaps only a handful examples in the country.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #55  
Purple95Z28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Default

It has worked out pretty well for me, but I'm not on a stock bottom end either. You need to shift at about 65-6600rpm if you run stock heads so it's too much for the stock rotating assembly to last very long.

Aside from that, it does pretty well. If you see my track time in sig with a 2.0 60', it would be somewhere like a 12.30 with a bit of traction which isn't too shabby. I raced a few cars supposedly making a lot more power then me and kept up with them just fine. I think the 6 speed + 4.10s combination makes it a very fast setup for what it is.

My gas mileage has been pretty bad.. 13-16mpg city driving and something around 22-24mpg highway.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #56  
BlackLT1Z's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 407
Likes: 1
From: Euless, TX
Default

Delsoto on CamaroZ28.com made 440rwhp and 400rwtq with a GM847.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:33 AM
  #57  
Purple95Z28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlackLT1Z
Delsoto on CamaroZ28.com made 440rwhp and 400rwtq with a GM847.
Yeah I remember that. Do you remember what kind of heads he was running? I think it was either LE3 or AI 200ccs...
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #58  
street demon2k3's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Palmview, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Maybe a one-off, but certainly not common-place. 115 from a cam-only LT1 is very rare, with perhaps only a handful examples in the country.
Im just missing 1mph to be at 115mph. Still got a few more mods to go, so Im confident it can probably go nearer 116mph once I get the intake ported and fix the ignition problem up top.

I used have a cam-only LT1 with a big stall and custom grind cam, and although this new camaro has a cc306 it feels way faster. Of course I think its just the difference between A4/3.73/4K stall vs M6/4.10's. My old car went 12.2@112mph with lots of problems, and this new car prolly wont do as good with the stock 10-bolt behind it. I blew my clutch the same night I went to the track so its been down for a while now.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #59  
BlackLT1Z's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 407
Likes: 1
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Purple95Z28
Yeah I remember that. Do you remember what kind of heads he was running? I think it was either LE3 or AI 200ccs...
Actually they are only the LE2s.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #60  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by street demon2k3
Im just missing 1mph to be at 115mph. Still got a few more mods to go, so Im confident it can probably go nearer 116mph once I get the intake ported and fix the ignition problem up top.

I used have a cam-only LT1 with a big stall and custom grind cam, and although this new camaro has a cc306 it feels way faster. Of course I think its just the difference between A4/3.73/4K stall vs M6/4.10's. My old car went 12.2@112mph with lots of problems, and this new car prolly wont do as good with the stock 10-bolt behind it. I blew my clutch the same night I went to the track so its been down for a while now.
Aren't you at 3100 lb also? I think Frank went around 116+ at 3300 lb with the much smaller Crane 210/224.

Last edited by engineermike; Jan 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.