LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

question for mustang guys out there?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:43 AM
  #21  
Joshiedoom's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Between Bowling Green/Owensboro
Default

There is one turbo v6 stang here that runs high 11s I do believe. No telling how much money hes got in it. My friend recently bought a 98, it has headers and a CAI and its about as fast as my car on ice.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #22  
ALEXZ28's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

i have had 4 mustangs all are garbage. this is my first camaro and i will never go back to ford unless its for a cobra.. GT's unless ur getting a super charger dont waste the money.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by ALEXZ28
i have had 4 mustangs all are garbage. this is my first camaro and i will never go back to ford unless its for a cobra.. GT's unless ur getting a super charger dont waste the money.
Actually, I'm making my car a full bolt-on car first and have a buddy that is making his LS1 T/a a full bolt-on car, this doesn't include head's and cam, and we are going to see how they fully stack up against one another. So far we are at a dead tie, he has headers back with a tune, and i have mods in sig. Then, He's going to build his motor with a MS4, and I'm going to do a 4.7 whipple build!!! Should be hella fun!!!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #24  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
Actually, I'm making my car a full bolt-on car first and have a buddy that is making his LS1 T/a a full bolt-on car, this doesn't include head's and cam, and we are going to see how they fully stack up against one another. So far we are at a dead tie, he has headers back with a tune, and i have mods in sig. Then, He's going to build his motor with a MS4, and I'm going to do a 4.7 whipple build!!! Should be hella fun!!!
"Full bolt"-ons never includes heads and a cam.
Dos your buddy have a lid?
Full bolt-on to full bolt-on you will lose.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:49 PM
  #25  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
"Full bolt"-ons never includes heads and a cam.
Dos your buddy have a lid?
Full bolt-on to full bolt-on you will lose.
He gets his lid today, So it should be fun, even if I do lose, people will know how a full bolt-on S197 does against a full bolt-on LS1!!!

Last edited by 06MUSTANGGT24V; Feb 10, 2009 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #26  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
He gets his lid today, I actually have him by a half a car to a car now. So it should be fun, even if I do lose, people will know how a full bolt-on S197 does against a full bolt-on LS1!!!
His lid will make up for that when he puts it on.
Oh, and I wasn't try to come off rude. Just so you know.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #27  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
His lid will make up for that when he puts it on.
Oh, and I wasn't try to come off rude. Just so you know.
Yea Man it's cool, It's just the intraweb so no offense taken. We're just curious, like I said should be hella fun!!!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #28  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
Yea Man it's cool, It's just the intraweb so no offense taken. We're just curious, like I said should be hella fun!!!
Yes it will. Just curious...transmision and gear on both cars? That plays a HUGE roll in the matter.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #29  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
Yes it will. Just curious...transmision and gear on both cars? That plays a HUGE roll in the matter.
T3650 with 3.55's in mine
T56 with 3.42's or 3.23's in his, we dont know

Last edited by 06MUSTANGGT24V; Feb 10, 2009 at 03:47 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #30  
user 648967286742's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Default

well i have to give the OP credit. at least he posted this v6 mustang crap in the lt1 lt4 category and not the ls1. lol j/k for the lt1's
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #31  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
T3650 with 3.55's in mine
T56 with 3.42's or 3.23's in his, we dont know
His is 3.42s, all M6s (except 1993) are that.

So I guess since you cleared up the V6s on the top of this page, why would the 98s these 2 guys own actually be somewhat fast (see: less then dog *** slow :jest) compared to all the others >_> o_0 Different transmission gearing in 98?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #32  
tspence45's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
Wonder if the 3.4/3.8L 5spd F-Bodys can beat the Stangs, seeing as how bad we destroy them.
Yes, they walk all over them. A 3.4 will easily outrun a 3.8 single port sixxer (94-98). I raced one with my old '94 Camaro with 5speed. I was bone stock, and he had intake and exhaust, with a 5speed. He got the hit, from a dig, and I passed him when I hit 3rd. And turns out, my car was only running on 5 cylinders. God the 3.4's were junk. The 99-04's(split port induction) were a little bit better though, and were almost a driver's race with a 3.8 Camaro. But, 9 times out of 10, a 3.8 Camaro would still take one.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #33  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Yes, they walk all over them. A 3.4 will easily outrun a 3.8 single port sixxer (94-98). I raced one with my old '94 Camaro with 5speed. I was bone stock, and he had intake and exhaust, with a 5speed. He got the hit, from a dig, and I passed him when I hit 3rd. And turns out, my car was only running on 5 cylinders. God the 3.4's were junk. The 99-04's(split port induction) were a little bit better though, and were almost a driver's race with a 3.8 Camaro. But, 9 times out of 10, a 3.8 Camaro would still take one.
nono I mean the V6 F-Bodys beating V8 Mustangs lol That's what I meant by "by how badly we beat them"
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #34  
tspence45's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default

^^^^A 3.8 Camaro would be a decent run for a 94-98 GT. I'd still put my money on the GT. Give the Camaro a couple bolt-ons though, and it could get real interesting. Course if the Fbody has a manual, and the GT has an auto, my money could be on the Fbody. The AOD trannies in the Mustangs are junk. A manual is probably almost a full second faster in the 1/4, than an auto.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #35  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
^^^^A 3.8 Camaro would be a decent run for a 94-98 GT. I'd still put my money on the GT. Give the Camaro a couple bolt-ons though, and it could get real interesting. Course if the Fbody has a manual, and the GT has an auto, my money could be on the Fbody. The AOD trannies in the Mustangs are junk. A manual is probably almost a full second faster in the 1/4, than an auto.
I dont know guys once again, I must of just bought some factory freaks, but i also had a 97 gt that had a 140k on the clock, and only had a drop-in K&N with a standard and 2.73 gears and i pulled a 11.86 1000' at 86.5mph. I could only get my gt now to do a 11.81 at 86.4 stock. So IDK

Last edited by 06MUSTANGGT24V; Feb 11, 2009 at 12:40 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:08 AM
  #36  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
I dont know guys once again, I must of just bought some factory freaks, but i also had a 97 gt that had a 140k on the clock, and only had a drop-in K&N with a standard and 2.73 gears and i pulled a 11.86 1000' at 86.5mph. I could only get my gt now to do a 11.81 at 86.4 stock. So IDK
Well, that sounds good till you find out it's 320ft short of a 1/4 strip heh So a 12.74 I see is doing 10.80 in the 1000', so yours is about 14.3-.5 then I'd guess. I say higher due to that car being faster and more powerful, so down the track farther he's gaining even more speed, where as a slower less powerful car is going to gain speed but not at as fast of rate. So while 14s is decent for the 6, it's not for a new 8, unless your previous GT was also an 8 (I thought all GTs were V8s). In which case then I guess if a 14 anything is a "factory freak" for a Mustang V8 >_>
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #37  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
Well, that sounds good till you find out it's 320ft short of a 1/4 strip heh So a 12.74 I see is doing 10.80 in the 1000', so yours is about 14.3-.5 then I'd guess. I say higher due to that car being faster and more powerful, so down the track farther he's gaining even more speed, where as a slower less powerful car is going to gain speed but not at as fast of rate. So while 14s is decent for the 6, it's not for a new 8, unless your previous GT was also an 8 (I thought all GTs were V8s). In which case then I guess if a 14 anything is a "factory freak" for a Mustang V8 >_>
Yea earlier I was talking about my first car which was a 98 v6. Then I got my 97 gt that ran a 11.86, where other 96-98 gts ran at best low to mid 12's in a thousand. Then my new car stock ran a 11.81 bc I could not get the launch down, I think I had a 2.3 60'. Now Saturday when I go to the track I'm wishing for 10.7's.

Last edited by 06MUSTANGGT24V; Feb 11, 2009 at 02:21 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:28 AM
  #38  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

heh Says 10.94 in your sig
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:29 AM
  #39  
06MUSTANGGT24V's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
heh Says 10.94 in your sig
yea hopefully 10.7's now I got my O/R x and TB spacer, and a lil better Driver mod never hurts
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:32 AM
  #40  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Originally Posted by 06MUSTANGGT24V
yea hopefully 10.7's now I got my O/R x and TB spacer, and a lil better Driver mod never hurts
lol... ok... So is it 11.81 or 10.94?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.