LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2003 | 03:33 PM
  #61  
Vendetta's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 2
From: NYC metro area
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

the LT1 has 1.5 RR stock. I dunno the lift of the Comp 305 though...
Old 10-22-2003 | 04:01 PM
  #62  
2xLS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 8
From: Warr Acres, OK
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

the LT1 has 1.5 RR stock. I dunno the lift of the Comp 305 though...
So he replaced 1.5 RAs with 1.6 RAs. Since there were no valve marks on the pistons, I'm betting coil bind on the springs now. Let's assume the rockers were adjusted 1/4 turn past 0 lash. With no oil pressure, turning the crank by hand, once the springs bound, the piston in the lifter just collapsed. Once the engine started and the lifters had pressure, something had to give and it was the pushrods.
Old 10-22-2003 | 05:07 PM
  #63  
brandboZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 3
From: Tallahassee Fl
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

The cam, springs, and lifters were all slightly used. I have seen tons of cam installs done with stock pushrods so I thought I would be alright but as I said before, I was wrong. I bought some new pushrods from CMotorsports and they should be here by Friday. After lots of questions and lots of answers by you guys I have seen where I went wrong and that was by lashing the valves while the engine was not running. Thanks for all the help and I will let you know how she pulls when I get her running this weekend!
Old 10-22-2003 | 05:16 PM
  #64  
grygst76's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

Coil bind would cause valve to piston crash though, that's the first thing I thought as well.
Old 10-22-2003 | 05:23 PM
  #65  
grygst76's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

good luck man!! hopefully it iturns for the best
Old 10-22-2003 | 05:25 PM
  #66  
brandboZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 3
From: Tallahassee Fl
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

good luck man!! hopefully it iturns for the best
Thanks
Old 10-23-2003 | 04:00 AM
  #67  
Gangly's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 943
Likes: 2
From: Houston
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

you can set the valve lash with the motor off and there should still be no problems. You will receive a little tapping until the lifters pump up but thats it. Hardened or not, the pushrods shouldnt have bent. Stock pushrods can handle way more stress than the 305 cam can deliver. What procedure did you use to set the valve lash with the motor off(intake close set the exhaust and when the exhaust opens you set the intake)?

305 with 1.5 RR's: 220/230 .510/.510

305 with 1.6 RR's: 220/230 .544/.544(aprox.)
pushrods arent really affected by high milage. The tips may wear down very slightly with high pilage causeing a variance in valvetrain geometry but it would be miniscule and resetting valve lash would correct this. Stock pushrods, hardened or not, can easily handle that cam all day long. If the lifters didnt have oil and then pumped up after install, it wouldnt cause the pushrods to bend, it would just open the valve a tad more but no where near enough to cause PtoV clearance issue. My first thought would be that the valves hit the tops of the pistons and so the valvetrain found the weakest link, but he said that the tops of the pistons had no scratches. This is a very interesting problem...I for one am very interested to see what the issue is, and if its because all 16 pushrods couldnt handle that small cam, then I've learned something new.
Old 10-23-2003 | 01:17 PM
  #68  
96SCTA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: BLOOMFIELD, NY
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

I fully agree with what gangly said. I think alot of people are thinking the the lifter is going to grow in size or somthing when it is fully pumped uP. When in fact its just the internals of the lifter that will become more firm and have less give when they pump up . with very little change is size, This hole thing does not make sense. Some facts are missing here. I truely think that the valves must have hit the pistons. Is it possible that they hit just enough to bend the push rods but not make any marks. I doubt it. So I will have to go and say that it was somthing to do with the springs binding up. Now if they did do this , it would explain the no marks on the pistons and valves and the bent pushrods.Now if this holds true i would say that you may alos want to check your lifters. Becasue if this secnario is true then there is a good change that now you may have a few colapsed lifters.
My last theory is this and dont take it wrong cause i dont know you. But it is very possible that you are a jack *** and just messed up the backlash very badly and in fact the valves did hit the pistons, but you did not want to sound like an *** so you said that it did not happen.
well thats just my 2 cents..
Old 10-23-2003 | 04:43 PM
  #69  
brandboZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 3
From: Tallahassee Fl
Default Re: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap

Im not a jack *** and I did lash the valves corrctly. Im pretty sure that coil bind was the culprit so before I put anything back together, Im ordering springs good for a .600 lift just to be on the safe side.
Old 10-24-2003 | 01:15 PM
  #70  
2xLS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 8
From: Warr Acres, OK
Default

Originally Posted by 96SCTA
I fully agree with what gangly said. I think alot of people are thinking the the lifter is going to grow in size or somthing when it is fully pumped uP. When in fact its just the internals of the lifter that will become more firm and have less give when they pump up . with very little change is size, This hole thing does not make sense. Some facts are missing here. I truely think that the valves must have hit the pistons. Is it possible that they hit just enough to bend the push rods but not make any marks. I doubt it. So I will have to go and say that it was somthing to do with the springs binding up. Now if they did do this , it would explain the no marks on the pistons and valves and the bent pushrods.Now if this holds true i would say that you may alos want to check your lifters. Becasue if this secnario is true then there is a good change that now you may have a few colapsed lifters.
My last theory is this and dont take it wrong cause i dont know you. But it is very possible that you are a jack *** and just messed up the backlash very badly and in fact the valves did hit the pistons, but you did not want to sound like an *** so you said that it did not happen.
well thats just my 2 cents..
If the lifters had nothing to do with it, then why was he able to turn the enging over by hand without coil binging the springs and bending the push rods then. Go get a new hydraulic lifter and see how far you can push the inner piston down in it's bore with no oil pressure keeping it up. I think it might surprise you.
Old 10-24-2003 | 05:13 PM
  #71  
Gangly's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 943
Likes: 2
From: Houston
Default

i just did, i couldnt push it down but a fraction of a millimeter if even that, but regardless, even if the lifter pumped up some crazy amount, it wouldnt push the valve down that much farther to where it could make contact with the piston, and he said there was no contact with the piston anyways. sounds like a spring issue which still makes me wonder how the pushrod bent, but something just isnt right here, like something is being left out, but I dunno, I could be completely overlooking something.
Old 10-24-2003 | 08:17 PM
  #72  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,830
Likes: 1,251
From: Chicago, IL
Default

In spite of some of the overly caustic replies this is a pretty good thread.

I like point made about it being coil bind. If the rockers were too tight, which they weren't since he did not tighten them a lot before startup, the motor would run poorly and shake right, but not bend all that stuff up.
Old 10-25-2003 | 01:10 AM
  #73  
brandboZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 3
From: Tallahassee Fl
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
In spite of some of the overly caustic replies this is a pretty good thread.

I like point made about it being coil bind. If the rockers were too tight, which they weren't since he did not tighten them a lot before startup, the motor would run poorly and shake right, but not bend all that stuff up.
If I adjusted the rocker arms wrong, is it possible that I didnt get everything tight enough and the pushrods slipped out of the trunions(sp) and caught the edge of the rocker arm, causing them to go bye bye? I know I would have had to really missed TDC on every piston but Im just trying to go at this from every angle. Thanks guys
Old 10-25-2003 | 02:20 AM
  #74  
Gangly's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 943
Likes: 2
From: Houston
Default

if they were loose enough for the pushrod to come out of the small, depressed bowl it pushes against, then you would have heard some crazy clacking sounds coming from the motor right when it fired up. the trunion is the part of the rocker arm that the rocker arm studs come up through(the middle piece that actually "rocks" within the rockerarm).

Last edited by Gangly; 10-25-2003 at 02:23 AM.
Old 10-31-2003 | 09:47 PM
  #75  
Mike Frey's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Cordova, TN
Default

I'm betting on coil bind. The springs he used were good for .550 lift. The lift on his cam, a 305 with 1.6 RR's: 220/230 .544/.544(aprox.), so he is only .006 in from coil bind if everything is set up perfect. Combined with his setting up the valve lash on possibly collapsed lifters, and BAM, coil bind and bent pushrods. IMHO
Old 01-02-2015 | 12:58 PM
  #76  
wayneSS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Ouch!
Old 01-02-2015 | 01:19 PM
  #77  
94LTZ's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 750
Likes: 1
Default

Bumping 12 year old threads ftmfw!
Old 01-07-2015 | 11:25 PM
  #78  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,064
Likes: 546
From: Jackstandican
Default

Holy **** I am old...
Old 01-08-2015 | 12:18 AM
  #79  
93M6Formula's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by wayneSS
Ouch!
Good lord, digging back to the days before I even had a license!
Old 01-08-2015 | 12:45 AM
  #80  
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 49
From: Missouri
Default

Pretty good ole thread.


Quick Reply: what could cause 16 bent pushrods on start up after cam swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.