93-95 mac headers vs 96-97
I know the single cat style usually puts up in the ~20rwhp range (when using their ory).
The single cat style look like "stubby" LTs, but the dual cat style is 1 part "stubby" LT and 1 part "pretzel."
How does the dual cat style compare to the single cat style for their headers as far as rwhp/rwtq gains are concerned?
I know the single cat style usually puts up in the ~20rwhp range (when using their ory).
The single cat style look like "stubby" LTs, but the dual cat style is 1 part "stubby" LT and 1 part "pretzel."
How does the dual cat style compare to the single cat style for their headers as far as rwhp/rwtq gains are concerned?
I have mac mids into their y-pipe into a 3" magnaflow cat into flowmaster catback and it sounds and gave my car a lot more power. I choose the mac's to have the same ground clearance as stock. The only thing i would ever change is to get a magnaflow catback because they sound a lot better than flowmaster.
my 2 cents
I have mac mids into their y-pipe into a 3" magnaflow cat into flowmaster catback and it sounds and gave my car a lot more power. I choose the mac's to have the same ground clearance as stock. The only thing i would ever change is to get a magnaflow catback because they sound a lot better than flowmaster.
my 2 cents
The Macs were nice headers. Like I've said before, the only thing I didn't care for and what you need to watch out for is the spark plug wires sitting too close to them. There are ways around it like doing the OTVC style.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Im gonna go with the old style on my 97 because it looks like it has less restrictions and is cheaper than the 96-97.



Have you had it on the dyno yet? 