LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Install EFI connection LSX PCM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #161  
BizZzatch350's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,793
Likes: 15
From: T E X A S
Default

dr97Z,

Have you figured out the tach? Our 93 is doing the exact same thing.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #162  
S10Wildside's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JB_97ws6TA
^^ I would also like to know the answers to thiese questions plus what you guys did with the second knock sensor? Can it be tuned out of the computer or did you have to install the sensor on bank 1?
The LS1 PCM allows you to use...
- one or two knock sensors
- flat response or resonant type knock sensors

Resonant
LT1/LS1 type knock sensors. Single wire.

Flat Response
LS2 and newer type knock sensors. Two wires. Does not fit LT1 (or SBC) block.

Because of the motor mount clearance issues on bank one in the f-body, it's easiest to use only one resonant type knock sensor. Specifically the 96-97 LT1 knock sensor...and not the earlier LT1 knock sensor. Simply change the calibration to indicate one knock sensor and you're done.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #163  
shankels94ta's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Regarding the tach issue...my 94 was about at half RPM when i first started it. I changed the tach pulses high and low to 3 and it works dead on now. Hope that helps!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #164  
Cheap Guy's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default This is great

I was driving my 97 the other day during a strong storm and I got the dreaded stumble along with the SES indicating my opti was not very happy. It dried out, the SES is gone and all seems well, but I just don't trust this car as is for long trips, which I like to do on occasion. I like this solution but 1. I don't feel like taking my car apart AGAIN right now, 2. the price is a little too much for this summer. I sent an email to the company with a few questions and they got back quickly.

I'm thinking about still going with a LTCC, which is simpler to install (leaving the opti as-is) and upgrading to this at a later date when/if I get a little work done on the engine. I assume you folks upgrading from the LTCC are using your existing coils?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #165  
Tricked-Out-Toy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Does anyone know if you can delete the oil pressure sensor from the PCM? Does it need to know oil pressure? Im going to be running full autometer gauge setup and its not needed...
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #166  
S10Wildside's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tricked-Out-Toy
Does anyone know if you can delete the oil pressure sensor from the PCM? Does it need to know oil pressure? Im going to be running full autometer gauge setup and its not needed...
The LS1 Camaro/Firebird does not have an oil pressure sensor (but they do have a one wire sender).

However, the LS1 Corvette does have an oil pressure sensor, but it's not required. If not using the oil pressure sensor with a Corvette calibration, you simply need to disable the DTC...or deal with the MIL illuminated.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 11:04 PM
  #167  
dr97z's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: North Platte, Nebraska
Default

Just wanted to say, I couldn't be happier with this kit. My dyno graph was incredibly smooth, no missfires. Runs and drives great.

Tach issue can be resolved in tuning by the way.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #168  
BizZzatch350's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,793
Likes: 15
From: T E X A S
Default

We were able to fix our tachometer issue as well with the tuning, tach and speedo work perfect
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #169  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by T/ALT1
Awesome would like to see some dyno numbers from a built 383 with this setup.
Is there some reason you would expect the numbers to be higher than the original PCM? Unless you have a healthy enough engine to need to go past 7000 to make power, it ain't gonna happen.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #170  
T/ALT1's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 2
Default

Yeah I would like to see something with a large solidroller or hydraulic that would pull up to 7400-7500rpms but it's not common on here. I just went to a used fast DFI setup b/c it was cheaper than just the wiring harness for the LS1 PCM setup and should be much easier to tune. Later
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #171  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

I now use a FAST XFI in mine. Compared to my old LT1 PCM, it only made more power above 7000. My old 383" liked to be shifted about 8000, so it loved it. A 7000 RPM LT1 won't make one more hp with a different PCM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #172  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

...and they certainly don't advertise it doing so either. The tuning options increases three-fold out here in SoCal.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 11:09 PM
  #173  
dr97z's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: North Platte, Nebraska
Default

No More Optispark is the object here. My dyno graph was so much smoother from having no missfires, and I wouldn't be afraid to take it anywhere now.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 06:31 AM
  #174  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

People having a lot of Optispark problems need to look in the mirror for the cause. A new GM unit, or even better a Dynaspark, properly installed, with a sub 7500 RPM engine will run fine for many miles. Dowel pin engagement depth and cam end play are crucial as well as locktite on the rotor screws along with alumini pop rivets holding the blade on the rotor if you are spinning it over 6500. Don't buy parts store crap, nor any other brand aftermarket. No matter how pretty yellow or red they are.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 06:34 AM
  #175  
S10Wildside's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
Is there some reason you would expect the numbers to be higher than the original PCM? Unless you have a healthy enough engine to need to go past 7000 to make power, it ain't gonna happen.
TPIS did a 396ci LT1 comparison with LT1 PCM, high output coil, and MSD optispark and then LS1 PCM with individual coils. The gain was 28 hp and 17.5 ft-lb on the engine dyno. I seem to recall the engine being pulled to 6200 rpm.

TPIS also mentioned that the Delteq system slightly improves horsepower and torque compared to stock LT1 ignition.

Source is Street Thunder Magazine, May/June 2010. I can't link to the article because EFI Connection is not a paying vendor on LS1tech.

Last edited by S10Wildside; Jul 15, 2010 at 06:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #176  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by S10Wildside
TPIS did a 396ci LT1 comparison with LT1 PCM, high output coil, and MSD optispark and then LS1 PCM with individual coils. The gain was 28 hp and 17.5 ft-lb on the engine dyno. I seem to recall the engine being pulled to 6200 rpm.

TPIS also mentioned that the Delteq system slightly improves horsepower and torque compared to stock LT1 ignition.

Source is Street Thunder Magazine, May/June 2010. I can't link to the article because EFI Connection is not a paying vendor on LS1tech.
You have a pm.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 11:50 PM
  #177  
YSILT1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

So I just fired up my new engine setup. The build consist of of Trick flow heads ported by TEA, Solid Roller Cam, Vic Jr Intake, Elbow, 95mm TB, EFI Connection ECM. After already trying the LTCC, Deltech, Electromotive, MDS with the factory ECM. On my YSI Supercharger 383 LT1. I have had nothing but problems trying to fire above 18lbs of boost with the other set ups.

This setup already sounds crisper and the throttle response in amazing.

Two thumbs up to EFI Connections. Will have all the VE mapping done tomorrow and then on to my Dyno Jet for full throttle tuning.

The LS based ECM is light years better than the LTX ECM. Just the fact that we can use a 3 Bar operating system is amazing.

Thanks Mike for all the help a few months ago when I was doing the wiring harness.

Will keep everyone posted.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 09:42 PM
  #178  
RuQuicker97's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: N.C.
Default

Using the do it yourself wiring harness from EFI ordered it today. Hoping the wiring will all be smooth sailing, is there any links I should check out to make this easier? Plan on taking the LT1 harness out and sitting down in front of the TV and going to town.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #179  
YSILT1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Just take your time and double check everything. I used pinouts from both my 96 Trans Am and a 02 Trans AM.

That way it was easy to make a spread sheet of what went where.

Hope that helps. Took me about 10 hrs to make. That was cutting and shortening wires and removing crap that I didn't need anymore. The harness turned out amazing.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #180  
qc97z's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 624
Likes: 1
From: Moline, IL
Default

I'm getting ready for my first start soon with EFI connection...full drivetrain swap, procharger F1A...I can't wait! I got the plug-n-play harness...but it was used, so I got a great deal on it. Otherwise, I'd have been sitting in front of the TV wiring too!
This thread has been a great read, especially for those interested or are in the midst of building with one.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.