Stock rocker arm studs deflection point??
Ihonestly cannot remember the springs that i had put in but they were matched up with the custom cam i am currently runnng. The cams lift is around a .540 lift and am running stock rockers at the moment.
Actually i guess i otto be asking if the rocker arms or the studs would be deflecting at this point?
Actually i guess i otto be asking if the rocker arms or the studs would be deflecting at this point?
I'm wondering about this as well, I'm running cc918's w/AI's 226/234 w/ .574/.541 on stock studs... 150#'s seat @ 1.845" spring height, 420#'s open @ 1.150". maybe someone will have an idea, I think the only way to tell for sure tho would be to put a high speed camera on it and wind it up.
Trending Topics
). I may push it further if I have to or ever make it to the track. I'll prolly bring it to a dyno day next season and figure out whats best. its only temporary tho, next year or two I'll throw some better heads on.. maybe throw some better bolts on the bottom end. I only put ~6k miles on it a year so I'm not too worried.sorry for the hi-jack OP, good question tho!
There should not be any further discussion on 7/16" studs IMO. They're MUCH stronger than the stock 3/8" studs, deflect less, and only increase valvetrain stability. Go with them.
well it's just a matter of if it's in his budget honestly
new studs = new rockers (which I'm sure would be NSA so therefor...) = guideplates = upgraded pushrods
also another factor is if he goes with 1.6 rockers his increased lift over a 1.5 might push it into valve float territory with the springs he is unsure of, that only they work for his current lift, so that could mean new springs, locks, retainers, etc as well
yes upgrading to 7/16 is the smarter, safer choice, but like the original post asks, is it the neccessary choice?
new studs = new rockers (which I'm sure would be NSA so therefor...) = guideplates = upgraded pushrods
also another factor is if he goes with 1.6 rockers his increased lift over a 1.5 might push it into valve float territory with the springs he is unsure of, that only they work for his current lift, so that could mean new springs, locks, retainers, etc as well
yes upgrading to 7/16 is the smarter, safer choice, but like the original post asks, is it the neccessary choice?
I agree 7/16 would be the way to go..and yes it wouldnt be cheap to upgrade ...so many other things are affected when going to the bigger stud ...i guess im going to have to start peicing some parts together for the swap then..With 10lbs of bost on top of the added lift i am already getting some float above 5,000 and i usually shift anywhere between 5,000- 5,500. I think my springs were only in the 130-140 lbs of pressure at the seat.
Tomknow for sure would take some pretty sophisticated equipment. I bet CompCams has the equipment and has done the testings; whether they're setup to share the results is anyone's guess.
I suspect it would depend on the specific parts being tested too. Who's studs, what springs and at what pressure were they setup, RPM, cam, etc.
Jake
West Point ROCKS! Nation's TOP COLLEGE per Forbes Magazine!
I suspect it would depend on the specific parts being tested too. Who's studs, what springs and at what pressure were they setup, RPM, cam, etc.
Jake
West Point ROCKS! Nation's TOP COLLEGE per Forbes Magazine!
I'm wondering about this as well, I'm running cc918's w/AI's 226/234 w/ .574/.541 on stock studs... 150#'s seat @ 1.845" spring height, 420#'s open @ 1.150". maybe someone will have an idea, I think the only way to tell for sure tho would be to put a high speed camera on it and wind it up.

