LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Ai 200cc CNC H/C Dyno, A4, 425rwhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2009, 10:40 AM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't see why this is hard to believe for some. You use good parts and some attention to detail and the car will run fast.

Congrats
Old 10-21-2009, 10:46 AM
  #42  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Advanced Induction
:

The converter is locked, so it isn't going to be far off of an M6 #. Again, because we offer the most consistent ported cylinder head available, as well as the most consistent cams (100% in house QC), the guys making 420-430 on stock short block cars are the best example of the potential of the parts. Many of the guys posting results online have some sort of issue that needs to be worked out, regardless of what parts they run. The guys who run the #'s get the car "right." As far as your car goes, it looks like you have done a good job on the setup, running into the 11's at 114. Our average stock short block cars trap 117-119 w/ the faster cars running low 120's and the fastest at 131 NA.
Thanks for responding, now it makes alot more sense to me. I really can't believe how much potential stock LT1 castings actually have, that is quite impressive. Right on par with many heads/cam LS1's even. You guys are turning out some consistently fast cars, sparked my interest.
Old 10-21-2009, 11:39 AM
  #43  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
buzz12586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Guys, the LT1 is not that different than a GEN I SBC. People have been making well over 400rwhp with SBCs for years. It just takes complimenting parts.
Old 10-21-2009, 11:43 AM
  #44  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Impressive numbers

To those questioning the range or peak numbers,
keep in mind that a "22x cam" doesn't have to be 220/226 -114 ... it could very well be (and is very likely closer to) 228/236 -110

425 though a locked stall is very doable on pump gas with a cam that size, ported heads (AI or otherwise), a properly-assembled motor and a good tune.

Last edited by James Montigny; 10-21-2009 at 12:34 PM.
Old 10-21-2009, 11:59 AM
  #45  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,042
Received 536 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bowtienut
And he was right........2nd time to the track and I'm already shifting at 6900 and trapping at 7100.
With that power curve you are only hurting performance by setting shift points that far past power peak.
Old 10-21-2009, 12:08 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Not surprising to me. Right on par.
Old 10-21-2009, 12:52 PM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

what weight is the impala at?
Old 10-21-2009, 01:09 PM
  #48  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

AI,
It would have been helpful to simply have stated in the OP, that the converter was locked when the numbers were produced rather than leaving it to the imagination. That said, I would have not have raised the issues that I did if that were stated.

I have been around long enough to know to know that A4's dyno like **** next to a comparable M6 and it is my understanding that many guys dyno with the converter unlocked if they are simply doing pulls. Obviously if you are tuning and the computer is hooked up to the car, you can force it to lock up and get the nicer numbers. Thats what I would have done if I had an A4. IMHO, stating the condition of the converter during the measurement is just as important as stating if power correction is taking place in order to avoid these issues.

I made the statement that there must be a "wildcard" in this situation and the converter locked was the wildcard. I seriously doubt that anybody would resist calling BS if it were determined that the converter was NOT locked based on the information provided.

Again. Very nice numbers and hats off to the owner, builder and AI. I am grateful that this was discussed in a more mature manner than what has been discussed in the past.
Old 10-21-2009, 01:43 PM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
what weight is the impala at?
38XX lbs
Old 10-21-2009, 01:45 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Forget the Dyno numbers for a minute.

That 38XX lb car just trapped almost 120 MPH with heads/cam/stock block. THAT's the amazing part.
Old 10-21-2009, 01:57 PM
  #51  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Is that pretty light for a B body?

I am at nearly 4000 full race weight. Yeah, thats big for a f-body vert.
Old 10-21-2009, 02:15 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28rag
Forget the Dyno numbers for a minute.

That 38XX lb car just trapped almost 120 MPH with heads/cam/stock block. THAT's the amazing part.
that's definately very light for an impy

pretty good considering ramair95ta only trapped 1~mph more with the same cylinder heads on a high compression 383 in an fbody.

that imp is definately very well setup to run that number besides the great top end on that motor

Last edited by myltwon; 10-21-2009 at 03:26 PM.
Old 10-21-2009, 02:17 PM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

IIRC that was a shakedown pass for Joe, and it has yet to be dialed in. I think has WAY more in it. Not speaking for him, just saying.

You can bet that this car is dialed in to the nth degree, and the results show it. Great running car! We need video
Old 10-21-2009, 02:21 PM
  #54  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

yeah that's point I was trying to make, that this car is THAT dialed in. def a good job on whomever got the convertor/gear selection and suspension maximized
Old 10-21-2009, 03:57 PM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by myltwon

pretty good considering ramair95ta only trapped 1~mph more with the same cylinder heads on a high compression 383 in an fbody.
Those are shakedown passes, untuned and wrong gearing, nowhere close to optimized, as stated above. I be he's got another 5-7 MPH in it.

Originally Posted by wrd1972

I am at nearly 4000 full race weight. Yeah, thats big for a f-body vert.
Why so heavy? Mine's only at 3760 with me in it and it's a full weight 'vert with a cage.
Old 10-21-2009, 04:01 PM
  #56  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28rag
Those are shakedown passes, untuned and wrong gearing, nowhere close to optimized, as stated above. I be he's got another 5-7 MPH in it.
so he was trapping 121 on a stock tune?

like I said I know those are dialed in passes I'm just saying look at what has BEEN accomplished through a quality dialed in setup, just to show how much potential joe's has with the kind of attention to detail the impala has. joe's car is a 200cc AI hr package just with the impala correct?
Old 10-21-2009, 05:13 PM
  #57  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28rag
Why so heavy? Mine's only at 3760 with me in it and it's a full weight 'vert with a cage.
I guess its the:
17" 9.5" C6 rims
285-40-17 wide *** tires
2 10 subs in very small cabinet
2 amplifiers
TD exhaust with LT's
Spare and jack
My big *** weighing in at 245#

I have done no weight reduction and dont really plan to. Its just a fun car, not really a race car.
Old 10-21-2009, 05:30 PM
  #58  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28rag
Those are shakedown passes, untuned and wrong gearing, nowhere close to optimized, as stated above. I be he's got another 5-7 MPH in it..
Huh??? I thought the hole point of this thread was what a properly tuned and well put together set up is capable of? I also read this is the 2nd time at the track with the set up. Not really a shake down.
IMO this car seems to be set up to take records, and is fully set up for the track. Also with a locked converter and 10bolt, those numbers dont seem out of reach to me. The weight of the car, makes no difference on the dyno.
Old 10-21-2009, 05:41 PM
  #59  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
Huh??? I thought the hole point of this thread was what a properly tuned and well put together set up is capable of? I also read this is the 2nd time at the track with the set up. Not really a shake down.
IMO this car seems to be set up to take records, and is fully set up for the track. Also with a locked converter and 10bolt, those numbers dont seem out of reach to me. The weight of the car, makes no difference on the dyno.
nah he's talking about ramair95/joe's car
Old 10-21-2009, 05:51 PM
  #60  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah Thats the car I was talking about on the last page. This impy must be set on kill.
Joes car is a bigger motor, solid roller, lighter weight car with the same heads so what gives?


Quick Reply: Ai 200cc CNC H/C Dyno, A4, 425rwhp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.