LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Torque arm or coilovers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2009, 10:42 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
am_muscl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

so that torque arm is better for a 6speed? Cuz mine is auto, or does it not make a difference? I wouldn't think it makes a difference but I also plan on running true duals later on so that torque arm would be the best?
Old 12-24-2009, 11:57 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm personally running the Jegster adjustable TA.. Not because I bought it, but I got it for free, so why not. It works great. To answer your question, it doesn't matter if its 6spd or auto, either will work, just some people prefer a certain one. It's all preference and how your setup is
Old 12-25-2009, 01:36 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,382
Received 124 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by am_muscl
so that torque arm is better for a 6speed? Cuz mine is auto, or does it not make a difference? I wouldn't think it makes a difference but I also plan on running true duals later on so that torque arm would be the best?
Any Torque Arm that isn't on the back of the Tailshaft Housing is ideal..that's my opinion and I'm sure others will agree.

It works pretty well with TD's.
Old 12-26-2009, 12:28 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Valkyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Do you need the adjustable torque arm if you run that relocation bracket that lets you adjust the mount position?
Old 12-26-2009, 02:28 AM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Valkyn
Do you need the adjustable torque arm if you run that relocation bracket that lets you adjust the mount position?

You can run any stock length torque arm (adjustable or not). You can even re-use the stock torque arm (not recommended).
Old 12-26-2009, 08:56 AM
  #26  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,040
Received 535 Likes on 387 Posts

Default

I would definitely do a tunnel mount TA especially since it is a manual. It doesn't matter how much torque is produced, what breaks parts is shock to the driveline and because the stock TA is nothing more than thin stamped steal it can fatigue/break easily especially around the bolt holes where it mounts onto the differential.
Old 12-26-2009, 08:58 AM
  #27  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I disagree with the tq arm or getting it "dialed in"

What exactly are you dialing in? pinion angle?

Stock tq arm works fine..... I would do the shocks, you have alot more tuning capability with shock setting springs and ride ht than you do with just a tq arm. Sure you need both but If I had to pick one I would do the shocks first...best you can afford
Old 12-26-2009, 09:02 AM
  #28  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
I would definitely do a tunnel mount TA especially since it is a manual. It doesn't matter how much torque is produced, what breaks parts is shock to the driveline and because the stock TA is nothing more than thin stamped steal it can fatigue/break easily especially around the bolt holes where it mounts onto the differential.
If the suspension was working properly, transfering wt ect. would you agree it take alot of this "shock" of the dead wt out of it? Creating momentum that lifts the car then transfers it into a push?


I would like your opinion since you go to the track once ever 2 years
Old 12-26-2009, 09:19 AM
  #29  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,040
Received 535 Likes on 387 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mdacton
If the suspension was working properly, transfering wt ect. would you agree it take alot of this "shock" of the dead wt out of it? Creating momentum that lifts the car then transfers it into a push?


I would like your opinion since you go to the track once ever 2 years
The thing is those drive components need energy to start the "momentum" process which equates to high energy slamming against a part that is not moving. There is no such thing as loading up the suspension or driveline at the line w/ a manual. It is impossible to eliminate slack between pinion and ring gears therefore the transfer will always be violent before momentum is created. Of course you wouldn't know that since you have to resort to the ***** way out of drag racing with an auto...
Old 12-26-2009, 10:11 AM
  #30  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Badazz 97 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
The thing is those drive components need energy to start the "momentum" process which equates to high energy slamming against a part that is not moving. There is no such thing as loading up the suspension or driveline at the line w/ a manual. It is impossible to eliminate slack between pinion and ring gears therefore the transfer will always be violent before momentum is created. Of course you wouldn't know that since you have to resort to the ***** way out of drag racing with an auto...



LOL seriously? wow......
Old 12-26-2009, 10:44 AM
  #31  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
The thing is those drive components need energy to start the "momentum" process which equates to high energy slamming against a part that is not moving. There is no such thing as loading up the suspension or driveline at the line w/ a manual. It is impossible to eliminate slack between pinion and ring gears therefore the transfer will always be violent before momentum is created. Of course you wouldn't know that since you have to resort to the ***** way out of drag racing with an auto...
This is one of the main reasons I ditched the Tunnel mount TA. The way the Tunnel mount TA pivots back and forth shocks the tranny so hard. Its to violent and what I beleive was the start to my output shaft breaking.

For instance if your driving on the hwy and down shift as low as possible then punch it. The rear end yanks back when you shift then slams the DS forward into the trans when you nail it. Not good.
If you were just drag racing, I dont think this would even be an issue since there no down shifting. On the street it definitly is a prob IMO.
Old 12-26-2009, 10:57 AM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
This is one of the main reasons I ditched the Tunnel mount TA. The way the Tunnel mount TA pivots back and forth shocks the tranny so hard. Its to violent and what I beleive was the start to my output shaft breaking.

For instance if your driving on the hwy and down shift as low as possible then punch it. The rear end yanks back when you shift then slams the DS forward into the trans when you nail it. Not good.
If you were just drag racing, I dont think this would even be an issue since there no down shifting. On the street it definitly is a prob IMO.
Are you sure you had the right pinion angle on it? I had that same exact problem with mine when I first put it on, but then I adjusted it and it's practically noise-free and functions great.
Old 12-26-2009, 10:59 AM
  #33  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,040
Received 535 Likes on 387 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
If you were just drag racing, I dont think this would even be an issue since there no down shifting. On the street it definitly is a prob IMO.
It is a problem especially for drag racing. The traction involved w/ the transfer of shock to the drive line on a non-moving object is especially hazardous on gears, TA and tail shafts if the TA is connected. It has nothing to do with a "properly" setup suspension as mdacton wants to boast. It has to do with the slack between where torque is generated and the receiving parts of its wrath. Those with autos don't have this problem because (at least when they brag about foot braking) the drive line and suspension parts can simply be loaded, locked, cocked and ready to rock which mostly eliminates any sudden shock or parts slamming into each other. That's why they can get away w/ using a 10-bolt and stock susp. components when running quicker times.
Old 12-26-2009, 11:06 AM
  #34  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
The thing is those drive components need energy to start the "momentum" process which equates to high energy slamming against a part that is not moving. There is no such thing as loading up the suspension or driveline at the line w/ a manual. It is impossible to eliminate slack between pinion and ring gears therefore the transfer will always be violent before momentum is created. Of course you wouldn't know that since you have to resort to the ***** way out of drag racing with an auto...
The stock TA is more than sufficient to work with what he has.....

the ring and pinion slamming against each other? Wow how much backlash do you run? Or would you even know since you dont set up your own.

I know what we can do...lets go by your own personal performance......11.99 once on a low tide full moon in egypt in the middle of december on top of a mountain top with a 1.89 60'.....hmmmmm sounds like you are full of it, internet jockey wanna be. You wish you were half the man I am. Dont be bitter b/c you got a stocking full of coal old bastard
Old 12-26-2009, 11:10 AM
  #35  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,040
Received 535 Likes on 387 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mdacton
The stock TA is more than sufficient to work with what he has.....
the ring and pinion slamming against each other? Wow how much backlash do you run? Or would you even know since you dont set up your own.
Auto pansies just don't understand. No matter the backlash there is still going to be shock to the drive line. If it wasn't so then people with a manual transmission and bolt-ons would not be breaking gears/carriers or bending/breaking/cracking torque arms. You are posting of things you know nothing about.
Old 12-26-2009, 11:14 AM
  #36  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tis the season..
Old 12-26-2009, 11:17 AM
  #37  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1badzee
Are you sure you had the right pinion angle on it? I had that same exact problem with mine when I first put it on, but then I adjusted it and it's practically noise-free and functions great.
100% sure and I tried everything from -4 to +4. I used to carry an angle finder and tools in the car just to try differnt angles. Then I just gave up on the POS. Not to mention it sounded like crap.
Old 12-26-2009, 11:25 AM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
100% sure and I tried everything from -4 to +4. I used to carry an angle finder and tools in the car just to try differnt angles. Then I just gave up on the POS. Not to mention it sounded like crap.
Well I guess I should feel lucky.. Then again mine is somewhat different I think. It doesn't mount to the body with 4 bolts like that one, it actually hugs the tunnel like a glove and it's held on by like 14 bolts total or something, like this: (except the one I have is adjustable) http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...6/P1010064.jpg
Old 12-26-2009, 11:26 AM
  #39  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
It is a problem especially for drag racing. The traction involved w/ the transfer of shock to the drive line on a non-moving object is especially hazardous on gears, TA and tail shafts if the TA is connected. It has nothing to do with a "properly" setup suspension as mdacton wants to boast. It has to do with the slack between where torque is generated and the receiving parts of its wrath. Those with autos don't have this problem because (at least when they brag about foot braking) the drive line and suspension parts can simply be loaded, locked, cocked and ready to rock which mostly eliminates any sudden shock or parts slamming into each other. That's why they can get away w/ using a 10-bolt and stock susp. components when running quicker times.
I agree theres no comparison M6 to an Auto. Its def 100% harder on everything in a stick.
IMO The Tunnel mount TAs cause way more shock to the driveline then a full length reloacated TA. Only reason I dont think its a big issue on the strip is theres no heavy loads pulling the rear end backwards like downshifting does to the car. Its forward motion for the most part. None the less still alot harder on the car in a M6

Last edited by AChotrod; 12-26-2009 at 11:37 AM.
Old 12-26-2009, 11:34 AM
  #40  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1badzee
Well I guess I should feel lucky.. Then again mine is somewhat different I think. It doesn't mount to the body with 4 bolts like that one, it actually hugs the tunnel like a glove and it's held on by like 14 bolts total or something, like this: (except the one I have is adjustable) http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...6/P1010064.jpg
Your is a totally different set up. Its not just the noise Im talking about. Its how the front of the TA mounts to the crossmember. It actually pivots back and forth under hard loads. For instance If you down shift hard it pulls back also pulling back the DS, and if you nail it the TA pivots forward and slams the DS into the Tail shaft of the trans wich also shocks the hell out of the ring and pinion.
I think a full length relocated TA is the best way to go on a M6.


Quick Reply: Torque arm or coilovers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.