320RWHP ok with my mods?
12-19-2003, 03:40 PM
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area,Ca
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
320RWHP ok with my mods? I had my car on the dyno and it put out 320whp with 400lb Torque@2100rpm. Does this # seem low for what I have?
95 LT1/4l60 ported heads 202/160valves cc305 cam, 1.6RR, 30lb Injectors, 52mm TB, WP, new opti spark. Dyno tune by PCMforless
I was hoping for 350rwhp I am thinking about going with a cc306 cam.
The car runs 11.81@115 at the track
95 LT1/4l60 ported heads 202/160valves cc305 cam, 1.6RR, 30lb Injectors, 52mm TB, WP, new opti spark. Dyno tune by PCMforless
I was hoping for 350rwhp I am thinking about going with a cc306 cam.
The car runs 11.81@115 at the track
12-20-2003, 01:32 AM
#2
Originally Posted by Mas280
I had my car on the dyno and it put out 320whp with 400lb Torque@2100rpm. Does this # seem low for what I have?
95 LT1/4l60 ported heads 202/160valves cc305 cam, 1.6RR, 30lb Injectors, 52mm TB, WP, new opti spark. Dyno tune by PCMforless
I was hoping for 350rwhp I am thinking about going with a cc306 cam.
The car runs 11.81@115 at the track
95 LT1/4l60 ported heads 202/160valves cc305 cam, 1.6RR, 30lb Injectors, 52mm TB, WP, new opti spark. Dyno tune by PCMforless
I was hoping for 350rwhp I am thinking about going with a cc306 cam.
The car runs 11.81@115 at the track
12-20-2003, 11:47 AM
#5
Originally Posted by Mas280
The car runs 11.81@115 at the track
Dynos are worthless man, your car is trapping real good for what it is. You would think that it would make around 350 at the wheels but, I wouldnt worry about it. 115 with that tiny cam and heads is real good and who knows, you might have a mile or so still left in it.
12-20-2003, 01:49 PM
#6
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With stock heads, CC305 and shorty headers and with a catalytic converter I dynoed 315 rwhp. But, I could never run 11.8 in the 1/4 with that setup. Good thing I upgraded to the Jet Hot Long tubes, tons more power now 
. And by the way, like he said, who cares what the dyno says, if you ran an 11.8, that is very fast for that cam. Besides, you dynoed a butt load of torque.
. And by the way, like he said, who cares what the dyno says, if you ran an 11.8, that is very fast for that cam. Besides, you dynoed a butt load of torque.
12-20-2003, 03:54 PM
#7
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area,Ca
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like everyone here is from Texas.. Texas is my home state.
Has anyone seen the diff of the cc305 cam vs the cc306 cam, HP and 1/4 mile gains.
Has anyone seen the diff of the cc305 cam vs the cc306 cam, HP and 1/4 mile gains.
Trending Topics
12-21-2003, 01:33 AM
#8
TECH Senior Member
Seems to me like your dyno is awfully low, but not becuase of your car. Sounds like a crappy dyno... was it a Mustang? Cause with a time like 11.8@115mph I'd think that you were putting down more power... but that's just IMO..
