M29 Vs. T56
Last edited by BizZzatch350; Jan 21, 2010 at 09:22 PM.
Yes, 93s had to two different T56s depending on the rear gears. All Trans Ams were M29 cars, never seen a M28 Formula, only M28s I have seen have been Z28s.
1993 Manual/M28 3.36 2.07 1.35 1.00 0.80 0.62 2.73 (GU2)
1993 Manual/M29 2.97 2.07 1.43 1.00 0.80 0.62 3.23 (GU4)
Last edited by BizZzatch350; Jan 21, 2010 at 09:29 PM.
1993 Manual/M28 3.36 2.07 1.35 1.00 0.80 0.62 2.73 (GU2)
1993 Manual/M29 2.97 2.07 1.43 1.00 0.80 0.62 3.23 (GU4)
Any way to tell by looking at the trans whether or not it's an M28 or M29? Can you tell by the tags on it or anything? The owner is a long time friend of mine, he says it came out of a 93 trans am. I can tell for sure that the motor is a 93 (no crossover on intake) but who knows what the car really was...I know the motor/trans combo has been sitting in his garage for over 10 years, and appears to be fairly low mileage...
I love the gearing of the trans, it is like having 3.73's while still having the stock 3.42's, or that 3.73's would be almost like having 4.10's. So I guess you could argue that since you can keep a numerically lower gear, that your 10-bolt may be slightly stronger, since numerically higher gears are known for being more prone to breaking???
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
93 F-body with (M28) 6 speed Torque rating 360 lbs-ft. Has 2.73's - GU2
1st: 3.36
2nd: 2.07
3rd: 1.35
4th: 1.00
5th: 0.80
6th: 0.62
93 F-body with (M29) 6 speed Torque rating 400 lbs-ft. Has 3.23's - GU5
1st: 2.97
2nd: 2.07
3rd: 1.43
4th: 1.00
5th: 0.80
6th: 0.62
94+ F-body with (MN6) 6 speed Torque rating 450 lbs-ft. Has 3.42's - GU6
1st: 2.66
2nd: 1.78
3rd: 1.30
4th: 1.00
5th: 0.74
6th: 0.50
Last edited by LT1; Jan 22, 2010 at 06:14 PM.





