LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Possible 575 HP w/ some changes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #1  
stumprrp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default Possible 575 HP w/ some changes?

hey guys,

this thread is just for fun to see what ya'll think id gain with a few changes to my golen 396. its certainly fast enough for now, but near year i guarantee ill want more power.

without nitrous, say i were to step up to a 2.055 intake valve, more porting to both sides, some other trick head stuff, more porting to the intake, thinner head gaskets to get compression to 12:1, and a bigger cam along the lines of a 244/252 .600+ 108-110 LSA, and a set of 1 7/8 headers.

right now the car has ported TFS heads with a 2.02 intake valve, 11.5 compression, slightly ported intake, 236/244 .580-90 112 lsa cam, and 1 3/4 headers. made 520 HP and 490 TQ on the engine dyno.

thats definitely some cash for 40-50 HP gain, but i mean without juice it can get expensive, im guessing the peak torque would be up around 4800 from 4000 and HP from 6200 to 6800.

opinions?
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Anything you do to promote more air and fuel combustion is always going to make more power. 575HP at the crank shouldn't be too hard. With a 20% drivetrain loss, my 383 is (likely) around 550, so for yours it's certainly feasible.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
stumprrp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default

your car runs hard as hell, for some reason this car lost like 25% on the dyno, so i dont even go by that figure, its WAY faster then 390 RWHP lol. looking at your build the only real difference is you have about 1 more point of compression then myself, which is a good 20 HP probably
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

Golen's dyno is more than a little "happy" 25% loss once in car is typical so your super 520hp stroker makes LESS than a lot of good heads/cam setup cars. You want to make more power sell the whole thing to someone else and start over.

Don't bench race about how to pickup power. Copy Ramair95TA's setup, proven recipe.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #5  
Matts94Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, S.C.
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Golen's dyno is more than a little "happy" 25% loss once in car is typical so your super 520hp stroker makes LESS than a lot of good heads/cam setup cars. You want to make more power sell the whole thing to someone else and start over.

Don't bench race about how to pickup power. Copy Ramair95TA's setup, proven recipe.
I would have to disagree. There are quite a few Golen packaged motors making a good number. As a matter of fact, there is a Golen H/C package on a vehicle here in SC that is running killer times... and it's even heavier than your almighty caprice and runs a small cam! Not to mention the set up was cheaper than the other proven recipe's.

The AI undertones are being thrown around by you are amazing... No doubt Ramair95TA has a bad *** ride that will be in the 10's soon, but the OP can do what is mentioned with Golen parts. No need to sell his current set up, waste money and only be as fast as the other AI or die guys.

Just sayin.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,861
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

If that engine is making 520hp, mines making 620hp...and it may very well be....I'm just sayin'.

You guys put WAYYYY too much faith in a "HP" number. Put that turd on the track..THATS the number your after.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #7  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

25% drivetrain loss for a stalled 4L60E slushbox is about right.

Who cares what it puts down, take it to the track and see what it runs. 390 is not bad for an auto. My car made barely 350rwhp and ran 11.7s. Aba makes around 375 IIRC and runs killer times with a 100% streetable baby cammed 383.

There is more then one recipe for a quick car.

Last edited by Puck; May 1, 2010 at 03:01 PM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #8  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

http://www.impalassforum.com/vBullet...d.php?t=240110
This is the sort of thing that makes me say Golen is nowhere near as good as his magazine purchased reputation.
Cliff's notes, guys original golen was junk at under 7K miles and now so is the warranty motor, guy wised up and wont be installing a third Golen.

There are a LOT more examples like this out there.
Then there are the just never made power like the solid roller LE ported LT4 383 that made 545 on Golen's dyno but only 418 to the wheel and ran a blistering 12.5.

He had a handful of 440hp 383s butting down 320-330rwhp in b-bodies too, that is a low number for a cam only setup.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #9  
stumprrp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default

thanks for bashing my car, caprice. chad actually personally talked to me about the b body crowd and how he doesnt bother on the internet. this was his personal car for 3 years, so im sure it makes what he said it does.

why would i sell my motor and start over? it runs great, i beat a 410 RWHP GTO and nearly kept up with a 475 RWHP LS1 camaro that runs low 11s at 125 MPH. so i doubt it doesnt make 520 hp.

im not caught up with HP figures, i prefer track times, but with a whinning rear end i dont plan on driving 2 hours to blow it up.

any more GOOD suggestions?
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #10  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Shows how much he cares about his customer base if he doesn't bother with the internet.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #11  
marc97taws6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: DSM
Default

Originally Posted by stumprrp
im not caught up with HP figures, i prefer track times, but with a whinning rear end i dont plan on driving 2 hours to blow it up.

any more GOOD suggestions?
Is the car still running the 10 bolt? If so, I would say let her rip. 10 bolts are known to live long lives behind the auto. Before adding all these additional parts that add power, I would recommend making sure your suspension, rearend, and drivetrain is setup to utilize that power.

That includes a new rear-end, keeping the 4.10's if you please, bump up the stall to 3500-3600 rpm or even 4000rpms if you plan on staying NA, and is the tranny built for that power also
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #12  
stumprrp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default

marc - im pretty tempted to do that, but its also my old mans car, we went half each. i would prefer a little more converter but this one really drives nice.

ramair - he must do ok if he sells 100+ engines a year, i was in the shop and its a very nice facility.

i didnt post this for people to tell me that they dont like golen engines and that chad is a fraud, do you people get off to this ****? all i wanted was some suggestions for a little more power when im ready for it, thats all.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #13  
marc97taws6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: DSM
Default

Originally Posted by stumprrp
marc - im pretty tempted to do that, but its also my old mans car, we went half each. i would prefer a little more converter but this one really drives nice.
I have a Yank SS3600 and it drives perfectly fine. The only reason I'm getting bad gas mileage is my 3.73's cruising at 80mph on the interstate. In town it does perfectly fine. I'm not downing Golen at all. I was going to buy a bare lt1 block from them because it was cleared for a 383 and had 4 bolt splayed caps but I decided to go with a cheaper option elsewhere.

I would recommend focusing on the rear/tranny/suspension first if you want the car to be quicker/faster. Power can't really do much if you can't get it to the ground.

What are the goals for the car? Street driver with a little bit of strip time? Or just a street car and your occasional roll racer? How about budget between the two of you for modifications. Those few clarifications will help a great deal on how myself and other people can assist you in building you and your pop's toy
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #14  
Matts94Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, S.C.
Default

Originally Posted by stumprrp
thanks for bashing my car, caprice. chad actually personally talked to me about the b body crowd and how he doesnt bother on the internet. this was his personal car for 3 years, so im sure it makes what he said it does.

why would i sell my motor and start over? it runs great, i beat a 410 RWHP GTO and nearly kept up with a 475 RWHP LS1 camaro that runs low 11s at 125 MPH. so i doubt it doesnt make 520 hp.

im not caught up with HP figures, i prefer track times, but with a whinning rear end i dont plan on driving 2 hours to blow it up.

any more GOOD suggestions?
Ignore him...

Anyhow, are you opposed to going SR to pick up a couple of extra ponies?
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #15  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-m...ml#post7270644
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #16  
gregrob's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 4
From: 6,000+ feet
Default

Its also NOT a fixed % loss no matter how much HP you make.. People like to believe that for bench racing to inflat their dyno numbers, but it's just simply not true.

It takes X HP to turn X drivetrain, not a percentage of the total. It's been proven.

Take an engine making 350 at the crank, and figure 20% loss. So now it makes 280 at the tire...

Take an engine making 700 at the crank and the same 20% loss and now suddenly it loses 140hp??? and only makes 560 to the tire....??

No way...
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 05:49 PM
  #17  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,861
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Its also NOT a fixed % loss no matter how much HP you make.. People like to believe that for bench racing to inflat their dyno numbers, but it's just simply not true.

It takes X HP to turn X drivetrain, not a percentage of the total. It's been proven.

Take an engine making 350 at the crank, and figure 20% loss. So now it makes 280 at the tire...

Take an engine making 700 at the crank and the same 20% loss and now suddenly it loses 140hp??? and only makes 560 to the tire....??

No way...

Its more like that than you think, BUT it depends more on the drivetrain.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

I will agree it is not a set percentage BUT at the same time more power means more thrust and such so it can take more hp to turn the drivetrain in a 600hp car than a 300hp one.

IMO the truth lay somewhere between a fixed percentage and a fixed number say 20% on a 300hp car for 60hp loss but maybe 16% on a 600hp car so maybe 96hp but not the 120hp it would have been with a 20% loss.

On the golen stuff though I have seen about 25% on the 440hp cars and 23.5-24% on 540ish stuff.

Of course headers and accessories play into this as well, not just drivetrain and acceleration rate can play with numbers too.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #19  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Its more like that than you think, BUT it depends more on the drivetrain.
+1.

If you really want to get into it and make an arguement, you have to figure accessories, headers, oil weight, rear diff fluid, temperatures, tire/wheel weight, and all sorts of retarded stuff if you want to be **** about the exact drivetrain loss from flywheel to the rollers. For the rest of the world, 12% for a t56 and ~23% for a stalled auto will get you close enough. Its not an exact flat percentage, but there are way too many variables to calculate the real curve.

Like stated though, who gives a **** about 450rwhp if you still run mid 11s.
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 08:20 PM
  #20  
Matts94Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, S.C.
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.