Coolant Crossover AN Conversion, Part List and Pictures.

Parts run! Why would you need to do this? I know the bolts are expensive but what does this benefit? Is it because when you mill the heads the tube is the wrong length?
Can't imagine trying to tap the rear of the heads and get all that pluming together back there. I imagine someone could do it, but I hope it is never me

Al 95 Z28
I do like the way this was done but SS line would set it off.
I do like the way this was done but SS line would set it off.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If someone were to do this for aesthetics I would think you could just replace the section that runs along the intake and save a handful of fittings.
On a b-body the upper bellhousing bolts are easily accessed with a ratchet wrench from the top, looks like this would make that harder.
cost me only about $10 and no leaks. runs 180* all day in stop and go traffic in az heat..
AN line may look better but ive got no problem with one blaco hose next to my intake. its hidden by all the wiring BS anyways
/QUOTE]
Well Dwayne, you're the genius around here so I guess whatever you say goes. Yep.
If someone were to do this for aesthetics I would think you could just replace the section that runs along the intake and save a handful of fittings.
On a b-body the upper bellhousing bolts are easily accessed with a ratchet wrench from the top, looks like this would make that harder.
http://sdparts.com/details/gm-factor...parts/12556260
Tom
if you dont want to pay alot for a replacement line and yours is messed up, i can maybe understand trying to do something different. but the stock hardpipe is a good design and cant see doing away with it for a half dozen fittings and a hose that could potentially leak.
Edit : Not advocating that its better or a performance gain here... although... looking at the stock tubing and smaller holes in the stock banjo bolts, this setup might allow a little more coolant flow over stock and be less likely to clog up (if thats even a concern). The banjo bolts that were in my car looked pretty cruddy up in the holes. Dont know if previous owner did a bunch of stop leak or what.
Last edited by hyperzone; Mar 4, 2013 at 06:45 PM.
The stock threads in the back of the heads are NOT 1/4 NPSF. They do seem to be straight threads, but I'm guessing are some metric dimensions.
I bring this up because I thought instead of using a 1/4 NPT, I bought 1/4 NPSF to AN fittings. Apparently then I wouldn't need to bother with tapping the heads. Incorrect. The 1/4 NPSF fittings will not fit into the heads. I still had to buy a 1/4 NPSF tap to be able to thread the fittings into the heads. I've attached pictures showing the measurement differences between the 1/4 NPSF fitting and the OEM banjo bolts. The 1/4 NPSF fitting major diameter is 0.020" larger and has a 0.010" larger minor diameter. As you can see, the OEM threads do not have the allowance for 1/4 NPSF fittings. And after tapping with 1/4 NPSF, the OEM banjo bolts feel significantly looser for installation.
To be clear:
I'm not saying using the 1/4 NPT fitting is a bad idea.
I'm not saying you shouldn't use a 1/4 NPT tap instead.
I'm only pointing out - that if you think you could just buy 1/4 NPSF to AN fittings, unfortunately, you'll still have to tap the heads.
The banjo bolts having a 15 mm head further suggests the threads are metric. The OEM thread pitch is pretty close to 1/4 NPT or NPSF though. Your call with what fitting to go with. Good luck.



