le2 only heads hp gain?
That's the problem with these online sights. Everybody posts what they think/read. Nobody really posts what they've done. There's no valuable usable info in this thread.
my vote says go for it!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
my vote says go for it!
The duration or time the valve is in motion from seat to seat does not change. The valve starts to move and stops moving at the same time as with a lower rocker ratio. But it does move faster and farther relative to cam lift or lifter motion. The effect on the valve is like adding 3+- deg duration. The cam specs don't change. The valve timing doesn't change. The valve motion does change. But it's not enough to measure in terms of HP - just from a geometrical perspective.
All you are doing is adding lift,positioning the tip closer to the center of the valve tip, generally adding .031-.033 thousandths to the lift of the cam
The duration or time the valve is in motion from seat to seat does not change. The valve starts to move and stops moving at the same time as with a lower rocker ratio. But it does move faster and farther relative to cam lift or lifter motion. The effect on the valve is like adding 3+- deg duration. The cam specs don't change. The valve timing doesn't change. The valve motion does change. But it's not enough to measure in terms of HP - just from a geometrical perspective.
sorry again if i was misinformed. this is just wat i was reffering too. i know that the valves close and open at the same time and in no way is like adding an aftermarket cam.





