LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Winter Budget Build: 355ci AFR LE H/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2010, 09:55 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by killerz97
Ok whats the highest CR you can safely run with a 200 shot 383ci and GM847
Stop thread hijacking and start your own thread!
Old 10-13-2010, 10:31 PM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
No way is this true. There is FAR MORE to octane requirement than just static compression. My compression is upwards of 12.6:1.
IM talking about the static compression being about 11.5:1. There are many tuners on here that say it really starts to get finicky with anything higher than 11.5 stat. comp.
Old 10-13-2010, 10:36 PM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robsquikz28
IM talking about the static compression being about 11.5:1. There are many tuners on here that say it really starts to get finicky with anything higher than 11.5 stat. comp.
So what is not static about his 12.6:1 compression?
Old 10-13-2010, 11:10 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
SPEED#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Naperville,IL
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

compression and static compression are on 2 different levels, you know?
Old 10-14-2010, 04:45 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robsquikz28
IM talking about the static compression being about 11.5:1. There are many tuners on here that say it really starts to get finicky with anything higher than 11.5 stat. comp.
Static compression has absolutely nothing to do with octane requirements.
Old 10-14-2010, 06:50 AM
  #26  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
STOCKTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 93 intake is not a step backwards for max power as his looks really good on the porting side of things, but........... for this guy.

Find a 94 fuel rail setup and just get a shop to run a braided fuel line in place of the hardline crossover so it can work on that nice ported 93 intake. You can find the complete 94-97 fuel rail setup with the FACTORY regulator (dont buy into that aftermarket junk regulator) all in place then just a little fabrication could have it working on that 93.

On everything else listen to these guys as they have ripping cars and most are street cars.
Old 10-14-2010, 06:53 AM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by STOCKTA
The 93 intake is not a step backwards for max power as his looks really good on the porting side of things, but........... for this guy.

Find a 94 fuel rail setup and just get a shop to run a braided fuel line in place of the hardline crossover so it can work on that nice ported 93 intake. You can find the complete 94-97 fuel rail setup with the FACTORY regulator (dont buy into that aftermarket junk regulator) all in place then just a little fabrication could have it working on that 93.

On everything else listen to these guys as they have ripping cars and most are street cars.
Do you think that having a hogged out intake manifold with such a docile combo is a waste of $$$ and cause a LOSS in port velocity? I know you've dabbled quite a bit in porting/epoxy so you'd know a thing or two about it.
Old 10-14-2010, 06:55 AM
  #28  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
STOCKTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I dig I think I have a complete 94-97 fuel rail setup, the 93 SuperStock intake I sold ended up on a 94-97 fuel line car so maybe you can contact him to see what it takes to get it running on your setup. Also I think your going to need a 94-97 throttle cable bracket to make your intake work on your ride. I think I have a pile of those also so I will look for you as this will make the conversion easy.
Old 10-14-2010, 07:06 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
STOCKTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
Do you think that having a hogged out intake manifold with such a docile combo is a waste of $$$ and cause a LOSS in port velocity? I know you've dabbled quite a bit in porting/epoxy so you'd know a thing or two about it.
As long as the intake ports are not bigger than the heads intake ports he should be good to go. Even on a very mild combo just getting rid of all of the plenum restrictions that are direct behind the throttle blade holes would make a nice gain. If you look into his 93's TB holes it has some nice work put into it and im sure LE tapered the ports correct so its not like some of those ebay super hogged gasket matched intakes lol.
Old 10-14-2010, 07:45 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Thanks for the comments guys i appreciate them despite them more on the critising end of it but you guys have built them time and time again. As for the intake i got it with the tb for a great price and was just going to make my own fuel lines to mate up to it or buy the speed inc kit. Ive slept on it and i think im going to try and fetch some cash for my AFRs and try and find a set of stock ported heads that i can mill down to 56cc and get up to 11.4:1. A buddy of mine is looking at selling his in search of actually a 64cc head for his blower setup. Not really sure what a set of ported stockers go for and what do for a trade plus cash?

I have a set of ported LT1 heads. The porting was done by Hi Flow Heads in Alsip, IL. They have a reputation of doing some great work. They are 180cc intake runners with 58cc combustion chambers. The previous owner had them on a 355 w/ a solid roller cam and went 10.76's on motor and 9.8X on nitrous. Here's the basics:

LT1 castings, 180CC intakes, 58cc chambers.
2.02/1.6 Ferrea 5000 valves .100" longer than stock
Crane "10308" springs
7/16" screw in ARP studs
Comp Cams Guide plates



Question will the longer valve make a difference and are these springs interchangeable with HR and SR cams or he likely changed them out when he got them and put them on his car? My friend bought them off the guy that made the posting i quoted and just had them cleaned up and a valve job done so they are ready to bolt on and go. NOTE pics posted were before work was done. I figure all i will have to do is slighlty mill them to 56cc and call it a day. This way im gaining a full point in compression and the heads wont be as overheaded and match the the cam alot better. Worth it?

Last edited by 95mysticta; 10-14-2010 at 08:04 AM.
Old 10-14-2010, 08:09 AM
  #31  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPEED#1
compression and static compression are on 2 different levels, you know?
yep your dynamic compression is what will mainly tell you what gas your going to be running......a friend of mine just built a 12.2:1 motor and with a mild tune i got it to run on 93 just fine.....my old 355 was 11.3:1 and that ran just fine as well.......hell with a really mild tune i can run my 14:1 385 on a 50/50 mix.....its all about the tune and the cylinder pressure......static compression just kind of gives you a ball park of where the pressure will be......run your dynamic compression #'s and see what you come up with.....
Old 10-14-2010, 08:15 AM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
Static compression has absolutely nothing to do with octane requirements.
wtf, do you ever sleep I thought I was bad

either way then why does every tuner complain about compression and 93 octane to safely tune it then? Compression is to high its way harder to tune. Are you still running your knock sensor or is it completely turned off?
Old 10-14-2010, 08:47 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robsquikz28
wtf, do you ever sleep I thought I was bad

either way then why does every tuner complain about compression and 93 octane to safely tune it then? Compression is to high its way harder to tune. Are you still running your knock sensor or is it completely turned off?
I do sleep. I am fortunate enough to have a job that encourages me to surf the internet. Everyone should be so lucky!

As for the tuning thing, a good tuner doesn't complain about a setup; they make the setup work (within reason of course). Just because dynamic compression may be high doesn't mean a tuner CAN'T tune it. The ones that complain about it aren't good tuners. Bryan (from PCMforless) asked me for my SCR and DCR when I pulled onto the dyno. After a few minutes discussing my combo, he said "no problem." 30 minutes later he squeezed out the numbers below without 1 degree of KR. My KS is untouched and still works.
Old 10-14-2010, 08:53 AM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
355z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'd for sure pick up and run with the plan to bump compression. My old 355 was almost 11.8:1 amd my new 383 is 12.3:1. Both ran on pump gas. Im on E85 now but it was mainly an expieriment that had fairly good results.
Old 10-14-2010, 10:57 AM
  #35  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
I do sleep. I am fortunate enough to have a job that encourages me to surf the internet. Everyone should be so lucky!

As for the tuning thing, a good tuner doesn't complain about a setup; they make the setup work (within reason of course). Just because dynamic compression may be high doesn't mean a tuner CAN'T tune it. The ones that complain about it aren't good tuners. Bryan (from PCMforless) asked me for my SCR and DCR when I pulled onto the dyno. After a few minutes discussing my combo, he said "no problem." 30 minutes later he squeezed out the numbers below without 1 degree of KR. My KS is untouched and still works.
Same with me too buddy. The best job in the world and still be able to be on the best site in the world

Yes as for tuning I understand that and know what your talking about. Many tuners just cant get the tune to work out. Many shops/tuners just cant/dont or wont spend the time to to the tune the damn car the way it should be. My buddies car had a similar setup to you and they had turned off the knock sensor cuz they couldnt get it tuned. Then had to run mixed gas off about 100 octane when mixed 50/50. They then turned on the KS and everything went better. But I still think they could have gotten it tuned with the KS working on pumpgas
Old 10-14-2010, 01:14 PM
  #36  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Instead of changing everything, spend the ~150 to mill your heads down to at least 60cc. A 5cc mill will not effect your intake seal - that is only a .020 mill.

I see no reason at all to sell your intake or heads. 93 intake is a better foundation then 94-97. Sequential/batch means nothing - the drivability difference is not noticable and their is no power difference.

Those little 190 AFRs are not too big for a 350 either - just mill them down to up your CR and you'll be fine. They are not stock castings - I am willing to bet that even at over 290cfms and fairly large chambers they will still make more low end power then smaller ported stockers. No reason to downgrade on the most important part of any build, the heads.

True, you are under cammed, but emissions sucks - not much you can do about that. At least try what you have before you get rid of everything. Worst case scenario you can sell what you have and try something else.
Old 10-14-2010, 01:20 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

He said they are already at 58cc...
Old 10-14-2010, 04:15 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

They are 64cc as they sit, and even if i do mill them to 60cc it will only put me at 10.8 which is minimal. If i go for my buddys heads the 58cc will put me at 11.1 and if mill them to 56 it will put me at 11.4 which is a full one point bump.
Old 10-14-2010, 04:54 PM
  #39  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
old93camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

95mysticta if you want some heads ill trade you my LE2's for those 190 AFR????
Old 10-14-2010, 04:55 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
old93camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

and by the way i'm running 12:1 Cr and run 91 octane so it can be done


Quick Reply: Winter Budget Build: 355ci AFR LE H/C



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.