LT1's were underrated by GM???
She told me herself actually with Scott Settlemire
12-07-2010, 06:05 PM
#64
12-07-2010, 06:05 PM
#65
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the initial question has not really been answerd. it just turned into a LSX vs LTX war. the lsx is superior then the ltx. the lsx where made due to research and development.(remember I did not say LS1 is a souped up LT! it a WHOLE differen engine) Its the same when the LTx came after the TPI of when the TPI came after the TBI. they are like each others son. The son beats the father always but that does not mean that is has to not respect him. So although LSx if fas superior then a LTx the LSx crowd has to respect us.
Proud LT1 owner
Proud LT1 owner
12-07-2010, 06:06 PM
#66
12-07-2010, 06:11 PM
#68
Well there was two of you that jumped on my post AGAIN. Sorry.
And, there's no typo, you just read it differently than it was meant. I was talking about my car then I said they typically dyno higher. Meaning higher than mine, not than anything else.
I'm cool.
12-07-2010, 08:42 PM
#70
10 Second Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CALI
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And LS1's infact are superior to LT1's, just like LS2's are superior to LS1's, LS3 over LS2 yada yada yada.
12-07-2010, 10:05 PM
#72
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
12-07-2010, 10:32 PM
#73
12 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
