defaultexistence

iTrader: (11)

Before I ever Even heard this .....

When Solomon at lt1pcmtuning.com was tuning mine via data logging, he mentioned " that it's showing/tuning like a cammed lt1" unlike all otherwise stock lt1s he sees.. And asked me again.. Are you sure it doesn't have a small cam upgrade? ... But no.. It was a stock untouched 93 car with exhaust ..

I'm going to pull that cam out once I switch to my new motor , and find out what it's specs are to figure the myth out and post results.. I will all so take pix of the differences between the two intakes .

FAD2BLK93

I might be kinda bias here, but i have always known that 93's have a bit larger cam...better heads for porting, i have heard u can get 10-15 more cfm. I would also think that the intakes would also have more material as well. IMO

RamAir95TA

iTrader: (2)

According to sources the 93s, 94s and 95s all got the same cam. And any head that was NOT the 561 casting is preferred for porting (only OBDII cars got the weaker casting). So whatever advantages the 93s had were shared with the 94s and 95s.

Ballinonabudget

iTrader: (12)

93's ROOL!

AChotrod

iTrader: (17)

I knw Gizmo is always on the lookout for 93 intakes for his Stocker.

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Since I am the one that started the 93 vs. later intakes talk I feel it necessary to repeat that line.

FAD2BLK93

True...but 93's still RULE!!!!!!HA HA