LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

230/236 on a 110lsa DYNO!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2012, 02:23 PM
  #21  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

That is also true. The article has the dynojet graph that plainly says the correction being used is SAE so that is not a valid excuse for the discrepancy..
Thing is, the ONLY reason anyone would post STD numbers is to inflate them.

Take the car to the track and see if it works.
Old 04-09-2012, 07:50 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

So the 1.7's are putting you 230/236 .578/.589 right?

either way a 35+hp gain from a cam swap is still pretty legit.
Old 04-10-2012, 01:16 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,707
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trilkb
So the 1.7's are putting you 230/236 .578/.589 right?

either way a 35+hp gain from a cam swap is still pretty legit.
Yup and thanks...
Old 04-10-2012, 02:57 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Article in the latest GMHTP and the dynojet 224x showed 394rwhp where the Mustang was 369rwhp and the dyno dynamics was 366rwhp. That is a 6-7% higher than the other two brands.
Quite a bit of mustang dynos actually read higher than dynojets since its so easy to manipulate the #'s. Dynojets are fairly consistent since its just spinning up a drum.
Old 04-10-2012, 03:02 AM
  #25  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS
its NA relax buddy.........
Because NA motors are immune to damage from detonation or melting pistons from running lean. It's sad that a sponsor who does tuning would imply that.
Old 04-10-2012, 08:50 AM
  #26  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Because NA motors are immune to damage from detonation or melting pistons from running lean. It's sad that a sponsor who does tuning would imply that.
no they are not, but they also do not instantly blow-up either.... you're making it out that its a surprise it didnt blow up, and adding nothing to thread....
Old 04-10-2012, 09:08 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
1997b4c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Startex, SC
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS
no they are not, but they also do not instantly blow-up either.... you're making it out that its a surprise it didnt blow up, and adding nothing to thread....
agreed the car wont self destruct at that point n/a unless you have wy to much timing in it to begin with.
Old 04-10-2012, 09:22 AM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I have never heard of or seen a N/A motor blow up from running 15:1 A/F

I have seen plenty of cars dyno with a lean A/F similar to that and none had issues (except for not making max power). Now if he was running 16:1 or more, I would certainly lift off the go pedal.

Just my experience.
Old 04-10-2012, 06:27 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

Maybe I missed it in earlier posts..

Is the a/f 15.1 due to the old tune for the hot cam? Or did you get a mail order or something? Just kinda wierd to see a mail order tune end up that way is all im saying lol.
Old 04-11-2012, 01:05 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS
no they are not, but they also do not instantly blow-up either.... you're making it out that its a surprise it didnt blow up, and adding nothing to thread....
There's no reason to continue the pull once you see the 15:1 a/f. Any competent tuner would abort the run and add fuel before doing a full pull. In fact that's exactly what my tuner did when he was tuning my dad's LS1. A/F was 15:1 and it ended up being a 500 rpm dyno pull since he got out of it right away.
Old 04-11-2012, 11:15 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Sorry, I'm usually never a sponsor nuthugger. But I'd put Ryne up at the top of the stack as far as shops/tuners go. On a side note, I wasn't aware speed_demon24 makes a living tuning?
Old 04-12-2012, 10:15 AM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: jersey shore
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Seems legit
Old 04-12-2012, 11:06 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,707
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trilkb
Maybe I missed it in earlier posts..

Is the a/f 15.1 due to the old tune for the hot cam? Or did you get a mail order or something? Just kinda wierd to see a mail order tune end up that way is all im saying lol.
The Hot Cam tune was 12.5-12.7ish. When I added the new cam It went to 15.1... Now its set at 13.1ish.
Old 04-12-2012, 11:13 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,707
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
There's no reason to continue the pull once you see the 15:1 a/f. Any competent tuner would abort the run and add fuel before doing a full pull. In fact that's exactly what my tuner did when he was tuning my dad's LS1. A/F was 15:1 and it ended up being a 500 rpm dyno pull since he got out of it right away.
I told him to dyno "as is". I'm pretty sure Geoff at EPS would have aborted the run if it was unsafe. He's been tuning F-bodys since they had chips. I guess other tuners would abort to be safe because they know no better.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:10 AM
  #35  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great numbers, that's an awesome gain!

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Quite a bit of mustang dynos actually read higher than dynojets since its so easy to manipulate the #'s. Dynojets are fairly consistent since its just spinning up a drum.
+1, but I don't think a lot of people realize it happens sometimes. Gotta find a trustworthy shop.



Quick Reply: 230/236 on a 110lsa DYNO!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.