NewOrleansLT1

Well with AFR 180 heads and Hot Cam with unlocked 3500 stall I made 340rwhp. All I did was swap the damn cam to a 230/236 110lsa and put it on the dyno. With a lean 15:1 a/f it made 362rwhp at 6400 rpm. With a little tuning it made 374 rwhp at 6400 rpm. This is through pacesetter mids and a cutout! I could have spinned the motor a little higher but Geoff at EPS didn't recommend it. Thanks for the great work Geoff...

95mysticta

iTrader: (4)

Wow you ran it to 6400 with A/F at 15:1

When your a/f is that far out you shouldnt be running to that kind of rpm. Once you see it dip down you should stop and go back and edit your tables to get it closer inline. Im amazed it didnt go boom on a stock shortblock

TravisMcGill2000

iTrader: (2)

Congrats good numbers. Is it still on stock rear?

NewOrleansLT1

I told him to dyno as is. OOPS!!!

NewOrleansLT1

Yes, but I will at least get a TA girdle...

Rob94hawk

iTrader: (1)

Nice! Mustang dyno I'm assuming?

NewOrleansLT1

Thanks. Its a Dyno Jet (with a unlocked 3500 stall)

Puck

iTrader: (17)

374 is very respectable with baby heads, unlocked stall, and through Mid tube headers.

Grats!

bufmatmuslepants

iTrader: (3)

And through an auto, nice numbers

NewOrleansLT1

Thanks guys. My rwtq was 330 at 4700. That seems a little low to me. I was expecting a minimum of 350rwtq. What you guys think? Is the stall obsorbing torque or is the mid tubes hurting torque? Or???

transbird95

iTrader: (4)

Not too shabby, good job!

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

A torque converter is a multiplication device. It isn't hurting your torque number.

NewOrleansLT1

Well he started the pull at like 4500rpm so I don't know the the torque numbers before that, maybe it could have been higher...

gjohnsonws6

iTrader: (12)

What lobes are you using?

slomarao

iTrader: (6)

For those small heads thats a good amount of power. nice work bud

NewOrleansLT1

Thanks guys. I'm using the XE 230/236 .510/.520 on a 110 lsa with 1.7rr

NewOrleansLT1

Just found out that my numbers are SAE. Now I'm really impressed!! Just thought I'd share with you all...

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Article in the latest GMHTP and the dynojet 224x showed 394rwhp where the Mustang was 369rwhp and the dyno dynamics was 366rwhp. That is a 6-7% higher than the other two brands.

Ryne @ CMS

iTrader: (10)

its NA relax buddy.........

NewOrleansLT1

I was told that SAE shows 10-15rwhp LESS than STD...