LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

230/236 on a 110lsa DYNO!!!

Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:12 PM
  #1  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default 230/236 on a 110lsa DYNO!!!

Well with AFR 180 heads and Hot Cam with unlocked 3500 stall I made 340rwhp. All I did was swap the damn cam to a 230/236 110lsa and put it on the dyno. With a lean 15:1 a/f it made 362rwhp at 6400 rpm. With a little tuning it made 374 rwhp at 6400 rpm. This is through pacesetter mids and a cutout! I could have spinned the motor a little higher but Geoff at EPS didn't recommend it. Thanks for the great work Geoff...

Last edited by NewOrleansLT1; Mar 15, 2012 at 08:32 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:34 PM
  #2  
95mysticta's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 10
From: Oshawa, Ontario
Default

Wow you ran it to 6400 with A/F at 15:1

When your a/f is that far out you shouldnt be running to that kind of rpm. Once you see it dip down you should stop and go back and edit your tables to get it closer inline. Im amazed it didnt go boom on a stock shortblock
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #3  
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 1
From: chats,ga
Default

Congrats good numbers. Is it still on stock rear?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:42 PM
  #4  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

I told him to dyno as is. OOPS!!!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #5  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally Posted by TravisMcGill2000
Congrats good numbers. Is it still on stock rear?
Yes, but I will at least get a TA girdle...
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 08:55 PM
  #6  
Rob94hawk's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 28
Default

Nice! Mustang dyno I'm assuming?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 10:01 PM
  #7  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob94hawk
Nice! Mustang dyno I'm assuming?
Thanks. Its a Dyno Jet (with a unlocked 3500 stall)
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

374 is very respectable with baby heads, unlocked stall, and through Mid tube headers.

Grats!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 06:32 AM
  #9  
bufmatmuslepants's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,280
Likes: 49
From: Hampstead, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Puck
374 is very respectable with baby heads, unlocked stall, and through Mid tube headers.

Grats!
And through an auto, nice numbers
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Thanks guys. My rwtq was 330 at 4700. That seems a little low to me. I was expecting a minimum of 350rwtq. What you guys think? Is the stall obsorbing torque or is the mid tubes hurting torque? Or???
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:10 AM
  #11  
transbird95's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 736
Likes: 12
From: little falls minnesota
Default

Not too shabby, good job!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:28 AM
  #12  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

A torque converter is a multiplication device. It isn't hurting your torque number.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:38 AM
  #13  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Well he started the pull at like 4500rpm so I don't know the the torque numbers before that, maybe it could have been higher...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 11:12 AM
  #14  
gjohnsonws6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 156
From: Litchfield Park AZ
Default

What lobes are you using?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 11:51 AM
  #15  
slomarao's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: chicago,IL
Default

For those small heads thats a good amount of power. nice work bud
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 05:15 PM
  #16  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Thanks guys. I'm using the XE 230/236 .510/.520 on a 110 lsa with 1.7rr
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #17  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Just found out that my numbers are SAE. Now I'm really impressed!! Just thought I'd share with you all...
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 09:20 AM
  #18  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

Article in the latest GMHTP and the dynojet 224x showed 394rwhp where the Mustang was 369rwhp and the dyno dynamics was 366rwhp. That is a 6-7% higher than the other two brands.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 11:01 AM
  #19  
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: murrieta
Default

Originally Posted by 95mysticta
Wow you ran it to 6400 with A/F at 15:1

When your a/f is that far out you shouldnt be running to that kind of rpm. Once you see it dip down you should stop and go back and edit your tables to get it closer inline. Im amazed it didnt go boom on a stock shortblock
its NA relax buddy.........
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 01:58 PM
  #20  
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 13
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Article in the latest GMHTP and the dynojet 224x showed 394rwhp where the Mustang was 369rwhp and the dyno dynamics was 366rwhp. That is a 6-7% higher than the other two brands.
I was told that SAE shows 10-15rwhp LESS than STD...
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.