from mustang to camaro
#21
i dont like mod motors the 4.6s are weak i got a fox because u can throw on a $1500 turbo kit and make 450hp in a 2800lb car but it was breaking before i could do anything fun with it...plus in the 5.0 a cam and a tune $600=25 hp a camaro cam and tune $900= 45-70hp it speaks for itself less mods u can make a camaro faster and be reliable. a LS1 you can get around 7 or 8 k stock around 100k miles the lt1s are cheaper and im just lookin for a 450-550hp street car. nothin too crazy
Last edited by dkfbody19; 05-02-2012 at 11:58 PM. Reason: improper grammar
#22
The 302 isn't that great of a motor anyways. The Chevy 350 is basically the king of engines.
When you see a Mustang running under 10 seconds at the track, they pop the hood its a GM engine. Ford can't build an engine to save their life anymore. The one thing Ford did very well is a 9" rear.
I won't be sticking a 9" under my car rather a Dana 60 (S60).
When you see a Mustang running under 10 seconds at the track, they pop the hood its a GM engine. Ford can't build an engine to save their life anymore. The one thing Ford did very well is a 9" rear.
I won't be sticking a 9" under my car rather a Dana 60 (S60).
#24
The 302 isn't that great of a motor anyways. The Chevy 350 is basically the king of engines.
When you see a Mustang running under 10 seconds at the track, they pop the hood its a GM engine. Ford can't build an engine to save their life anymore. The one thing Ford did very well is a 9" rear.
I won't be sticking a 9" under my car rather a Dana 60 (S60).
When you see a Mustang running under 10 seconds at the track, they pop the hood its a GM engine. Ford can't build an engine to save their life anymore. The one thing Ford did very well is a 9" rear.
I won't be sticking a 9" under my car rather a Dana 60 (S60).
#25
maybe people are high where i live i do know out here when you buy a ls1 car doesnt matter the milage or what your payin for the name ls1. Im sure ill run across a good deal sooner or later.