LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

New motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #21  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

There is more to spring selection than just lift capacity.
The XFI lobes are fairly aggressive and a dual spring with the "right" seat pressure has a lot more weight to handle than the beehive springs Comp envisioned when they designed the XFI lobes which can mean the valve bounces off the seat when it closes at higher rpm, that and you are going to have to turn this MUCH higher than the 6200rpm Comp's literature suggests. It probably wont even peak by then and you need to rev past peak. Expect to need 6800+rpm if those heads actually work well.

I have tried a few different ignition things over the years and bone stock opti/coil with no ignition box is how my car has been fastest. Plenty of us have made the mistakes there is no need for the newbies to repeat them. First thing I bought for my car was $400 worth of ignition garbage that in the end only caused problems and I threw parts at it trying to figure out what was wrong wasting more money till I took the ignition "upgrades" off.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:13 PM
  #22  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

heard, thank you when i bought the cam it came with its own spring would it have been better to take the ones off the heads and put those on, i suggested that and my father told me i didnt want to start taking my heads apart.. all it told me about the valve spring was the outside diameter is 1.055 in.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:32 PM
  #23  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

There are those who will argue but IMO the 918 spring Comp recommends is insufficient because the 6200rpm Comp says it needs is wrong, more rpm means more spring is needed.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #24  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

IMO?. that is one thing that i wish i would of known the motors already back in are those spring going to put any of the parts of my car in danger.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:58 PM
  #25  
94nismoformula's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

imo=in my opinion
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:03 PM
  #26  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

Befor the motor went in.
After it was in
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:26 PM
  #27  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

The springs wont break quickly but the power will nosedive suddenly at higher rpm when the valves float.

Those valve covers are absurd, 5 minutes(less the second time you do it) with tin snips makes the stock valvecovers fit even wide body roller rockers.

The Bosch box makes me ask but I can't tell what it was for. You didn't put Bosch plugs in did you? What plugs did you use and what is the compression?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:31 PM
  #28  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

heard yea they made putting it in a pain in the *** i just thought there were issues with the rocker rollers hitting them, those are the ones we put in my dad said that with the blaster coil and msd box that i would be getting hot enough fire i was going to get the ngk. the compression is 11 to 1.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:33 PM
  #29  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

i had the ngk iridium in there before
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:41 PM
  #30  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

By 96 the idle emissions standards and 100K mile tuneup interval meant the ignition was quite "hot" bone stock.
Listening to people who "learned" how to mod an engine in the 70s is a sure way to fail.

My Dad was into cars when I was a kid, he lives a distance away from me now though so we don't do any of that together. He finds my car amazing because it breaks all the rules he knows. The one that shocks him the most is I get better mileage with a mid 11 second Caprice than he and I do our daily driver fullsize pickups. He has a hard time believing you can get economy like that with this kind of power.

11:1 is low for an NA LT1, most heads/cam cars use a thin gasket and endup higher than that, most built LT1s are 11.5-12.5 on pumpgas.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:44 PM
  #31  
Taz4e's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

, thats no bueno. again thats what my padre told me how do u test it or is it just combining everything u add???
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 2
Default

Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 PM.