Cooling system upgrade
#61
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: limbo
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
true, I like hearing dif points and seeing LT1 gurus debate each other! thats about the only time they really divulge as much info as they did here, other wise its just quick blurbs or you should do this or that but wont go into depth about it.
#62
You've been adamant as he has about not needing bigger cubes citing your hp with your "very expensive heads".
Even if one only makes the same peak power, the area under the curve is increased making for a faster car. The low end torque helps drivability and makes for a more fun street car.
And if one does want to spend more money on the heads, the cubes will allow one to make more power while staying under the 7000 RPM PCM limit.
The only reason I didn't stroke mine was a displacement/rulebook issue for a racing class. Since all I care about now is trying to win overall (being the fastest car out of all classes at the track that day) I wish I had the extra cubes.
We're all on the same team here.
#63
The most common cause, and where the "old wives' tale" came from, was circle track and roadracers in the old days, mainly using SBC's. They found the same thing when they removed their thermostats and came to the same conclusion causing them to run restrictor plates in place of the thermostats to fix the issue.
They mis-diagnosed the problem. As with many engines, when one removes the thermostat downstream of the water pump leaving only a low pressure radiator in between, the head pressure on the pump is reduced. This head pressure is important because pumps of this type tend to cavitate when they have nothing "pushing against" them. The reduction in head pressure reduced the cavitation threshold to the point it would occur at high RPM.
When the water pump cavitates it does all sorts of bad things. Besides creating heat of its own and forming bubbles in the fluid, most importantly it stops pumping efficiently--the flow rate is reduced. So by reducing the restriction, the end result was slower moving coolant...and naturally, higher engine temps.
Historically most engines have had a simple thermostat on the exit side of the engine so similar results can be expected.
Engines like the LT1 with "dual acting" thermostats are an entirely different animal as removing the thermostat will screw up the way the whole cooling system operates. I'm not familiar with the engines you mention, but that is another possibility.
Last edited by Jon A; 06-25-2013 at 02:09 PM.
#64
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: limbo
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In a closed loop system, the faster the fluid goes through the heat exchanger the more total heat is removed. It's a simple law of heat transfer that doesn't change. It had to be something else causing the issue.
The most common cause, and where the "old wives' tale" came from, was circle track and roadracers in the old days, mainly using SBC's. They found the same thing when they removed their thermostats and came to the same conclusion causing them to run restrictor plates in place of the thermostats to fix the issue.
They mis-diagnosed the problem. As with many engines, when one removes the thermostat downstream of the water pump leaving only a low pressure radiator in between, the head pressure on the pump is reduced. This head pressure is important because pumps of this type tend to cavitate when they have nothing "pushing against" them. The reduction in head pressure reduced the cavitation threshold to the point it would occur at high RPM.
When the water pump cavitates it does all sorts of bad things. Besides creating heat of its own and forming bubbles in the fluid, most importantly it stops pumping efficiently--the flow rate is reduced. So by reducing the restriction, the end result was slower moving coolant...and naturally, higher engine temps.
Historically most engines have had a simple thermostat on the exit side of the engine so similar results can be expected.
Engines like the LT1 with "dual acting" thermostats are an entirely different animal as removing the thermostat will screw up the way the whole cooling system operates. I'm not familiar with the engines you mention, but that is another possibility.
The most common cause, and where the "old wives' tale" came from, was circle track and roadracers in the old days, mainly using SBC's. They found the same thing when they removed their thermostats and came to the same conclusion causing them to run restrictor plates in place of the thermostats to fix the issue.
They mis-diagnosed the problem. As with many engines, when one removes the thermostat downstream of the water pump leaving only a low pressure radiator in between, the head pressure on the pump is reduced. This head pressure is important because pumps of this type tend to cavitate when they have nothing "pushing against" them. The reduction in head pressure reduced the cavitation threshold to the point it would occur at high RPM.
When the water pump cavitates it does all sorts of bad things. Besides creating heat of its own and forming bubbles in the fluid, most importantly it stops pumping efficiently--the flow rate is reduced. So by reducing the restriction, the end result was slower moving coolant...and naturally, higher engine temps.
Historically most engines have had a simple thermostat on the exit side of the engine so similar results can be expected.
Engines like the LT1 with "dual acting" thermostats are an entirely different animal as removing the thermostat will screw up the way the whole cooling system operates. I'm not familiar with the engines you mention, but that is another possibility.
#65
OK, that's definitely much different. Sounds like it's not a closed loop system...I have no idea how any of that stuff works (not a boat guy), so I'll take your word for it.
#67
What an excellent discussion.
I was momentarily buoyed by your noting that moving fluid through the heat exchanger more quickly must remove more heat…
As this has always been my operating theory.
Then you note that the LT-1 is a dual system, further noting the requirement for the thermostat, which can only slow the rate of exchange.
Jon, if you've the time, would you explain the nature of the LT-1 Cooling system, or direct me to a write-up of same? I should point out I am familiar with such to the extent of the 'reverse cooling', wherein the heads are cooled first, ahead of the block… and that this was what provided the LT design to increase compression, without fear of detonation on pump gas. I guess my question is more specifically oriented around the water pump and how the T-stats present 'directs' the flow…
I have always favored no stat… which I should point out, I am located in SW FL, where we're rarely concerned with freezes or such other issues related to the arctic regions north of Ocala, so this is a continual point of debate with the guys around the shop.
BTW, just took a look at your Z, beautiful car, sweet setup. Well done sir…
I was momentarily buoyed by your noting that moving fluid through the heat exchanger more quickly must remove more heat…
As this has always been my operating theory.
Then you note that the LT-1 is a dual system, further noting the requirement for the thermostat, which can only slow the rate of exchange.
Jon, if you've the time, would you explain the nature of the LT-1 Cooling system, or direct me to a write-up of same? I should point out I am familiar with such to the extent of the 'reverse cooling', wherein the heads are cooled first, ahead of the block… and that this was what provided the LT design to increase compression, without fear of detonation on pump gas. I guess my question is more specifically oriented around the water pump and how the T-stats present 'directs' the flow…
I have always favored no stat… which I should point out, I am located in SW FL, where we're rarely concerned with freezes or such other issues related to the arctic regions north of Ocala, so this is a continual point of debate with the guys around the shop.
BTW, just took a look at your Z, beautiful car, sweet setup. Well done sir…
Last edited by OVA1; 06-27-2013 at 05:13 AM.
#68
Yes, that's actually what makes it work better. You increase the average temp of the water in the radiator, which increases the average delta T between the water and the air moving through the radiator, which increases the overall heat transfer coefficient of the radiator...which allows it to remove more heat per unit time.
In a closed loop, if your heat exchanger is removing more heat, you reduce the average temperature of the water in the loop.
Though the radiator isn't cooling the water quite as much, it's cooling a lot more of it. That's the key. When you pump more water through the engine, it can remove more heat per degree of temperature increase.
So even if the water is entering the engine a few degrees higher, with an increased mass flow rate it can actually remove more heat from the engine while exiting at a lower temp than slower moving coolant.
Then you note that the LT-1 is a dual system, further noting the requirement for the thermostat, which can only slow the rate of exchange.
It has been a while since I've looked at this stuff in detail, but the way I remember it is if the thermostat is completely removed the re-circulation path is never closed off so I don't think it will force as much coolant through the radiator as an "open" LT1 thermostat properly installed will. In any case, with the quality 160 degree stat readily available there's really no good reason to run one of these engines without one.
Jon, if you've the time, would you explain the nature of the LT-1 Cooling system, or direct me to a write-up of same?
BTW, just took a look at your Z, beautiful car, sweet setup. Well done sir…
#71
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys! Excuse the late reply. Been out because of work. Great news though. Got the radiator and water pump installed last week, and have to admit im impressed. No matter what I throw at the car she stays just a hair over the first 160 mark. Im assuming she runs 165-175 from what I read. I get off the highway and she stays put in her temperature like a loyal girl. So I dont have to worry about her being in heat
Hey no problem. The booster is stock replacement. I figured I already have enough braking power with the Anti Lock. Pads, rotors, and calipers are all upgraded. The master Cyl is from a old buddy that works on cars and he installed an upgraded one for me. Other then that the car has really out performed the stock braking system for the past 7 months or so.
I am getting more interested in 1/4th times. Not sure what she’ll run though. I hear high 13’s or low 14’s. Get some times or at least some dyno numbers mate. She will like you to know what she is capable of doing
Jon A: Couldnt agree with you more. I havent read all your posts thoroughly, but did read the chart. Interesting you brought that up. Im sure you already mentioned this and most already know this, but not only the faster the cooling system is running the better it cools, but the higher the RPM the more energy it creates which in turn the hotter the engine gets. So in turn more rpm, more cooling, equal efficiency depending on many variables like car speed, what liquid coolant, fans, rad, ect. Interesting post for sure. Ill have to read it some more.
As my car I couldn't praise enough how satisfied I am with the system. Did an oil change along with the new WP, and rad and ran her pretty hard [4600-5500rpm] the past few days and her gauge didnt move a soul.
Call me delusional which what im about to say it most likely all in my head, but she feels like she gained a couple extra HP. I did a little experiment; Checked the intake and it was only warm when I got to work. Before it got so hot I could fry an egg. The intake elbow was room temperature, and the WP is obviously always hot. I know stock radiator is enough to cool 400hp but the reverse flow cooling really likes the new one. Now once I start modifying the car I wont have to worry about the radiator cracking.
Well I just knew you had better brakes! Did you replace anything else like the booster or master cylinder? (just curious - my setup is a vast improvement over stock but some days I feel she should be stopping better for what I've got... am wondering if these other parts could stand for improvement or "freshening up").
I really have nothing special under this hood. I think its one attractive looking engine lol, but compared to what some other LT1 guys have done let alone the insane amounts of power the new cars are making off the factory floor, she's definitely more bark than bite. No dyno #'s as of yet but I hope to have at least some 1/4 mile times by July. Of course you boys in Germany could care less about those with your autobahns
I really have nothing special under this hood. I think its one attractive looking engine lol, but compared to what some other LT1 guys have done let alone the insane amounts of power the new cars are making off the factory floor, she's definitely more bark than bite. No dyno #'s as of yet but I hope to have at least some 1/4 mile times by July. Of course you boys in Germany could care less about those with your autobahns
I am getting more interested in 1/4th times. Not sure what she’ll run though. I hear high 13’s or low 14’s. Get some times or at least some dyno numbers mate. She will like you to know what she is capable of doing
In a closed loop system, the faster the fluid goes through the heat exchanger the more total heat is removed. It's a simple law of heat transfer that doesn't change. It had to be something else causing the issue.
The most common cause, and where the "old wives' tale" came from, was circle track and roadracers in the old days, mainly using SBC's. They found the same thing when they removed their thermostats and came to the same conclusion causing them to run restrictor plates in place of the thermostats to fix the issue.
They mis-diagnosed the problem. As with many engines, when one removes the thermostat downstream of the water pump leaving only a low pressure radiator in between, the head pressure on the pump is reduced. This head pressure is important because pumps of this type tend to cavitate when they have nothing "pushing against" them. The reduction in head pressure reduced the cavitation threshold to the point it would occur at high RPM.
When the water pump cavitates it does all sorts of bad things. Besides creating heat of its own and forming bubbles in the fluid, most importantly it stops pumping efficiently--the flow rate is reduced. So by reducing the restriction, the end result was slower moving coolant...and naturally, higher engine temps.
Historically most engines have had a simple thermostat on the exit side of the engine so similar results can be expected.
Engines like the LT1 with "dual acting" thermostats are an entirely different animal as removing the thermostat will screw up the way the whole cooling system operates. I'm not familiar with the engines you mention, but that is another possibility.
The most common cause, and where the "old wives' tale" came from, was circle track and roadracers in the old days, mainly using SBC's. They found the same thing when they removed their thermostats and came to the same conclusion causing them to run restrictor plates in place of the thermostats to fix the issue.
They mis-diagnosed the problem. As with many engines, when one removes the thermostat downstream of the water pump leaving only a low pressure radiator in between, the head pressure on the pump is reduced. This head pressure is important because pumps of this type tend to cavitate when they have nothing "pushing against" them. The reduction in head pressure reduced the cavitation threshold to the point it would occur at high RPM.
When the water pump cavitates it does all sorts of bad things. Besides creating heat of its own and forming bubbles in the fluid, most importantly it stops pumping efficiently--the flow rate is reduced. So by reducing the restriction, the end result was slower moving coolant...and naturally, higher engine temps.
Historically most engines have had a simple thermostat on the exit side of the engine so similar results can be expected.
Engines like the LT1 with "dual acting" thermostats are an entirely different animal as removing the thermostat will screw up the way the whole cooling system operates. I'm not familiar with the engines you mention, but that is another possibility.
As my car I couldn't praise enough how satisfied I am with the system. Did an oil change along with the new WP, and rad and ran her pretty hard [4600-5500rpm] the past few days and her gauge didnt move a soul.
Call me delusional which what im about to say it most likely all in my head, but she feels like she gained a couple extra HP. I did a little experiment; Checked the intake and it was only warm when I got to work. Before it got so hot I could fry an egg. The intake elbow was room temperature, and the WP is obviously always hot. I know stock radiator is enough to cool 400hp but the reverse flow cooling really likes the new one. Now once I start modifying the car I wont have to worry about the radiator cracking.
Last edited by GermanLSX; 07-01-2013 at 07:04 PM.
#72
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#74