LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Mill heads? Thinner head gasket? Or both?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2014, 03:29 AM
  #1  
ADM
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
ADM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow Mill heads? Thinner head gasket? Or both?

Just took apart my engine for a freshening up, and was wondering about bumping up the compression some.

Its a 97 with a CC503, Pro Magnum 1.6, Comp 918 springs, full bolt ons and Transgo HD2 shift kit. No stall or gears at the moment, but will do that whenever funds are available.

I was considering the Victor Reinz 5898 0.026" head gaskets, or the Mr. Gasket 5716G 0.026" http://www.summitracing.com/dom/part...716g/overview/

Should I go with just the gasket swap? Or also mill the heads?

What quench area should I aim for with this build? And whats the highest compression I can run safely with pump gas? I run 91 octane.

Car is my DD, will never see the track. I do like to drive it hard every now and then but no racing.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:03 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If it were mine, with that fairly small cam, 91 octane, and not going for track numbers, I'd just run a thinner gasket.
With that cam, 91 octane, and the hot climate, I wouldn't target more than 11:1 CR.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:06 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
bufmatmuslepants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampstead, NC
Posts: 3,266
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Stock I think is about 0.022 in the hole, optimal quench is between 0.030 and 0.040, so do what you need to get there, closer to 0.035 if possible. I can never remember his username, but someone did 0.026 gasket and milled the heads 0.010 (cant remember what his chamber came out to) and got 11.5:1 with a AI 228/232 cam and made 370rwhp. I priced out milling heads 0.010 and it was I think $100, and decking the block 0.010 was $150, decking the block adds more cr since its more volume being removed. You need to do some math, but decking 0.010 would get you 0.012 in the hole, plus 0.026 gasket gives an optimal 0.038 quench, but you'll need to calculate your cr as that 503 may have too high of a dynamic cr to be really happy in the mid 12s. Take all I'm saying with a grain of salt you need to do your own calculations.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:43 AM
  #4  
ADM
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
ADM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Considering the heads were never milled before (I will measure the combustion chambers to confirm), calculations state that a mere gasket change to 0.026 results in 11.3:1 compression ratio.

Bore 4.000"
Stroke 3.480"
Gasket thickness 0.026"
Combustion chamber volume 54cc
Deck height 0.025" (worst case scenario?)

With a deck height of say 0.020" or 0.025" and a gasket thickness of 0.026" that puts me at 0.045" - 0.051" quench. I wouldn't worry about 0.010" away from optimal as this is not a max effort build.

Dynamic compression ratio with the CC503 will be 8.925 with the gasket change. Is that too high for a DD?
Old 03-18-2014, 06:54 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

VERY smart to measure things as you're doing.
Deck clearances vary from .023" to .03X" in production motors and chambers will probably show more than 54cc.
I think your CR estimates at this point are high. But yes, 8.9 is too high for 91 pump gas and daily driver environment considerations.
Old 03-18-2014, 09:21 AM
  #6  
Launching!
 
DUDCOUPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lmao 11.5.1 compression
Old 03-18-2014, 09:29 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
93M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DUDCOUPE
Lmao 11.5.1 compression
I don't see a problem?
Old 03-18-2014, 12:47 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
jaycenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Holiday, FL
Posts: 2,210
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ADM

I was considering the Victor Reinz 5898 0.026" head gaskets, or the Mr. Gasket 5716G 0.026" http://www.summitracing.com/dom/part...716g/overview/

.
I had lots of problems with the Mr. Gasket 5716's.
First they failed on my engine and then when I went to replace them I got 3 different sets of gaskets from summit racing and all of them pulled parts of the gasket material when I removed them from the packaging.
I tried chilling them freezing them and heating them and each time they failed to come out of the package correctly. A real stupid problem to have with a critical part.
I would spend the money for a good reliable gasket.
Old 03-18-2014, 03:56 PM
  #9  
ADM
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
ADM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bowtienut, you were right. I found my deck clearance to be 0.030". So even with a 0.026" gasket I will still be at roughly 0.056" quench.

I will measure my combustion chambers tomorrow.

Have a feeling this block has already been rebuilt not long before I purchased the car because the head gaskets were in excellent shape, the head bolt threads are shiny clean and the head decks are dead on flat! Even the gasket has not printed itself on the block deck or heads yet.

Also, the oil pump I removed is a Melling 155. I installed a GMHPP standard volume, high pressure pump I had installed on my previous car.

Must say I am lucky to have taken this engine apart because when I pulled the pan I found the pick up tube swinging easily and almost fallen off. Explains why I started getting low oil pressure suddenly.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:01 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
LT14LIFE JT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93M6Formula
I don't see a problem?
Me either considering it's 10.5:1 from the assembly line. I've heard of factory block/heads getting near 13.1:1 with 0 decked blocks, shaved heads, and thin gaskets. I'm planing on close to the same recipe with my cam only convertible. I'll admit that it's not exactly logical for a "street car", but I've seen much more radical setups out there that had longevity.
Old 03-18-2014, 08:17 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ahritchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DUDCOUPE
Lmao 11.5.1 compression



Quick Reply: Mill heads? Thinner head gasket? Or both?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.