LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

300 rwhp ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2014 | 08:16 PM
  #1  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default 300 rwhp ?

Another HP Question lol

Is it possible to hit 300 rear wheel horsepower with a 96 z28 6 speed stock internals LT1.

Right now car has- CAI, 2.5 inch straight pipes after the I pipe muffler.

Going to add- Throttle body bypass, air foil, maybe the 160 degree thermostat with fans that turn on early, headers, Y-pipe, and a good dyno tune. I don't want to put in a cam or rockers yet!

Do you think it might hit 300rwhp with all these mods done to it?
Old 04-24-2014 | 08:17 PM
  #2  
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 2
Default

Bolt ons will make 300rwhp through a M6.
Old 04-25-2014 | 09:29 AM
  #3  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

I was guessing maybe 280 at the wheel if I am lucky. I was thinking that a small cam might be needed to put down 300 at the wheel.
Old 04-25-2014 | 09:38 AM
  #4  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,065
Likes: 546
From: Jackstandican
Default

Originally Posted by F0x Slaughter
Bolt ons will make 300rwhp through a M6.
This and without a tune.
Old 04-25-2014 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
HellTeeOne's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Un-tuned bolt on cars routinely make 290+
Old 04-25-2014 | 10:17 AM
  #6  
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 1
From: chats,ga
Default

Originally Posted by 350 groundpounder
I was guessing maybe 280 at the wheel if I am lucky. I was thinking that a small cam might be needed to put down 300 at the wheel.
You should be close to 300rwhp with those mods. Could always do set of springs for a hot cam and 1.7rr. That would get you 300 easy. Spring be around 50 used and probly 200 to 300 for rockers.
Old 04-25-2014 | 12:23 PM
  #7  
lt1-xjs's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 10
From: centerville, ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 350 groundpounder
I was guessing maybe 280 at the wheel if I am lucky. I was thinking that a small cam might be needed to put down 300 at the wheel.
You won't need a cam, but I doubt you'll make it without rockers and springs.
Old 04-25-2014 | 02:27 PM
  #8  
93M6Formula's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2
From: Nebraska
Default

I put down 294 with boltons.
Old 04-25-2014 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
zlicious94's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Troutdale,OR
Default

I make 300rwhp and have ran a 13.0!
Old 04-27-2014 | 08:02 AM
  #10  
n2oblkz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 996
Likes: 2
From: Versailles, IN
Default

I made 300 with exhaust and bolt-on's and no tune.
Old 04-27-2014 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
smitty2919's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 18
Default

311/346 through my 95 M6 with 60K mi

PS longtubes
Catless
Borla CB
air foil
custom CAI
stock gears
dyno tune
Old 04-28-2014 | 11:18 AM
  #12  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

Quarter Mile Times with those 300 rwhp cars?????
Old 04-28-2014 | 11:39 AM
  #13  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 4
From: Bright, IN
Default

Originally Posted by 350 groundpounder
Quarter Mile Times with those 300 rwhp cars?????
A best of 12.36 @ 107 mph. 3900+ lbs. 309 STD rwhp.
Old 04-28-2014 | 12:21 PM
  #14  
Tbird232ci's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 408
Likes: 2
From: Cockeysville, Md
Default

I made 294 with bolt ons and a mail order tune.

Remember, every dyno will read differently.
Old 04-28-2014 | 12:29 PM
  #15  
lt1-xjs's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 10
From: centerville, ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 350 groundpounder
Quarter Mile Times with those 300 rwhp cars?????
I'm with bowtienut. I'd expect low to mid 12's at least.
Best 12.82 @ 104 also 309 rwhp pushing 3900#
Old 04-28-2014 | 04:33 PM
  #16  
93M6Formula's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by bowtienut
A best of 12.36 @ 107 mph. 3900+ lbs. 309 STD rwhp.
How the hell..... I can barely get a 13.3 with 294 HP. My 60's suck pretty bad though. Getting slicks this year and some drag shocks.
Old 04-28-2014 | 04:54 PM
  #17  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 13
Default

Pat is very skilled at getting the most from a setup so I wouldn't expect many folks to equal his results but they do speak volumes about what is possible.

Dynos also correct for weather so while HP numbers should be consistent across the country track conditions aren't. He gets nice east coast weather to race in.

That is in NO WAY a comment against him, same track same day I believe his 350 Impala will wax most stroker f-bodies. Just saying that I wouldn't expect a relative novice to get a bolton f-body to low 12s in Nebraska.
What is the MPH? That should tell us something about potential. 13.3 at 103 says it wont go much quicker, but 13.3 at 110mph says there is a LOT of 60ft time to be gained.
Old 04-28-2014 | 06:30 PM
  #18  
smitty2919's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 18
Default

I dunno 1/4 mile times on my car...I don't care about drag racing.
Old 04-28-2014 | 06:42 PM
  #19  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 4
From: Bright, IN
Default

Originally Posted by 93M6Formula
How the hell..... I can barely get a 13.3 with 294 HP. My 60's suck pretty bad though. Getting slicks this year and some drag shocks.
I'm an engineer geek I get a kick out of tweaking things to the max, and it helped that I had a friendly rivalry going for a few years with an east coast guy for the title of "world's fastest bolt-on ImpalaSS". Believe it or not, there was more in it than those 12.3x passes show. After a few more improvements, it was running 12.4x's and 12.5x's regularly here at 1000' Midwest tracks for a couple of years after that. I just never made it back east for some more glory passes.
Old 04-28-2014 | 10:18 PM
  #20  
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 2
Default

**** I trapped 103 and ran 13.8 best a couple years ago.
That was only with exhaust, intake, short throw, home tune.
60ft was 2.4 though haha. It was at a local track not a professional track.

I haven't ran this year but I have full suspension, 4.10s, and 10.5 slicks and 4.5 skinnies.



Quick Reply: 300 rwhp ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.