LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Low MPH with Hotcam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 03:21 PM
  #1  
Wallj's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, IN
Default Low MPH with Hotcam

So I had my car at the track for the first time in over a year. Over the winter I installed the LT4 Hotcam Kit. Anyways my times aren't impressive at all with my horrible 60' times. However I just installed a new clutch last week so I'm still getting used to it. My issue is that I feel like my mph at the end is extremely low for a bolt on hotcam car. I thought that even with a bad 60' your mph should still be fairly normal. So let me know if you think it's ok or if something is wrong. The car is a 97 z28 M6. I'm shifting at 6100. Mods: lingenfelter CAI, 93-95 style Mac mid tubes (better version than the 96-97 style) borla adjustable exhaust with flap completely open, hotcam kit with the 1.6 rockers and all, madz28 Tune, founders LCAs and Adj. panhard. Running on 285/40/18 Goodyear Eagle F1.

Here's my timeslip, I'm on the right (D21):
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 7
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Track elevation? Did you set valve lash properly? Are you sure you're not experiencing valve float?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
jewbacca's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Crappy Stupid Liberal Washington state
Default

Do you know your race weight? That will also play a big part in your MPH. If your race weight is around 3700-3800 that'd put you right at 330-340 HP, which isn't at all bad for a Hot Cam bolt on car (especially with mid-lengths).
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 06:57 PM
  #4  
guppymech's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland
Default

Those 18" tires are not good for drag racing, the 285 tire is almost 27" tall. Do you still have 3.42 gears? You should be going through the traps in 3rd gear not 4th. If you have 4.10s then of course use 4th and stay out of 5th. You're picking up 24 mph in the back half which is good. You need to work on the 60' time, but you know that.

Did you race at that dump 'No Limits' in Morocco IN.? What was the density altitude?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
Wallj's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, IN
Default

I raced at Lucas Oil Raceway in Indianapolis. The elevation is 700 I believe. Not sure what the DA was or how to find it. I raced July 19th at around 5pm. I don't know my exact race weight but it has no weight reduction whatsoever. Still have the spare and jack in it even. Plus me which is an extra 160. I'm going through the line at the very top of 3rd literally right as my shift light is coming on. Yes I do still have stock 3.42s. Also, I'm pretty positive I set the valve lash correctly. I followed Shbox's guide and have that nice low sewing machine sound without any abnormal knocking.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 07:15 PM
  #6  
jewbacca's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Crappy Stupid Liberal Washington state
Default

With you in the car I would guess the car weighed around 3800 (give or take 25 lbs depending on how much gas was in the tank). That puts you around 340 to the wheels. That really is pretty good for a hot cam only car.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
vtec's Avatar
Resident Racing Jerk
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: sc
Default

are you suuuuure its a hotcam? my 93 m6 was faster than that bone stock (albeit 3.42 gear). it went 8.0's @ 81mph iirc. no weight reduction, and i probably weighed around 160 back then.
see if you can put it on a dyno somewehre and see whats going on.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 08:37 PM
  #8  
pancho toco loco's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Even with your heavy 18in wheels and no weight out of the car you should only be around the 3600 area. DA was around 1700ish for you that day and time. ET corrects out to 13.7x's at around 106mph. I'm gonna say something is a miss. First off Id be shifting higher then 6100 with a hot cam. Im programmed to shift 1-2 at 6250 and 2-3 6150 stock cam auto. Being a stick car Id do a few test runs and hold the shifts and see where the power falls off then shift just prior to that and set your light accordingly. Id say a hot cam would want to be shifted around 6400ish. From there Id start working backwards from the plugs to wires coil to opti. My car ran great last season and at the start of this season was running fine then the opti died, new one in and I magically picked up a .15 and over 1 mph in the quarter. So you nvr know whats going on
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-1

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-8

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-9

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
guppymech's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland
Default

I shift my hotcam at 6k, tried 6200 for a few runs and saw no increase in trap speed. When I had the LT4 springs with 1.6 rockers I had valve float at 6k, better springs cured that. IMO the LT4 springs are no good for the hotcam with 1.6 rockers. The tall tires are knocking your 3.42s down to 3.23s or so. If you get any extra $$$ some 4.10 gears will work good with the hotcam.

Here's a link to a Density Altitude calculator, just enter the track, date and time info.
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php

Last edited by guppymech; Jul 23, 2014 at 08:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 09:39 PM
  #10  
Wallj's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, IN
Default

Originally Posted by vtec
are you suuuuure its a hotcam? my 93 m6 was faster than that bone stock (albeit 3.42 gear). it went 8.0's @ 81mph iirc. no weight reduction, and i probably weighed around 160 back then.
see if you can put it on a dyno somewehre and see whats going on.
I'm positive its the hot cam, i installed it myself as the whole kit.
car had about 3/4 tank of gas.
It just seems weird though, i read about all these bolton hot cam cars running like 110+and I'm nowhere near that.
Also, plugs and wires are new but i don't have any symptoms of the opti going out, hopefully thats not the case.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 10:46 PM
  #11  
jewbacca's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Crappy Stupid Liberal Washington state
Default

Originally Posted by Wallj
I'm positive its the hot cam, i installed it myself as the whole kit.
car had about 3/4 tank of gas.
It just seems weird though, i read about all these bolton hot cam cars running like 110+and I'm nowhere near that.
Also, plugs and wires are new but i don't have any symptoms of the opti going out, hopefully thats not the case.
You've really got to figure out how much your car weighs. I just finally too my hotcam car to the strip and trapped 106.8. Since I'm a big guy my race weight is right around 3950 lbs. While online hp/trap speed calculators aren't 100% accurate, they can give you a good idea of your HP (it is physics after all). With my weight and MPH I figure I'm right around 385 RWHP (I've got heads on top of the cam). Your race weight I would guess to be right around 3800-3850 lbs. With a trap of 103 you're right around 330-340 RWHP. That is where I'd expect a bolt on hot cam car to be.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2014 | 01:02 AM
  #12  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 598
From: Jackstandican
Default

Couple things. If the car hasn't been on a dyno, that is the easiest way to find your power peak and where you should be shifting. I think a hotcam properly set up should peak around 6000 to 6100? You should also be running a 4.10 gear and if you want good ET and MPH you need better tires. Get yourself some 16" wheels and BFG DR's, or go crazy and get 15" wheels with Hoosier QTP's. Probably would soften the blow on a 10-bolt, but use at your own risk. I'm sure weather conditions played a part in the lack of power as well.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2014 | 05:36 PM
  #13  
cuisinartvette's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 205
Likes: 3
From: Valencia Ca
Default

I would guess to be right around 3800-3850 lbs. With a trap of 103 you're right around 330-340 RWHP. That is where I'd expect a bolt on hot cam car to be.
X2, also ditto on the gears and stickier tire. Mail order tune?

Gotta know some cars are really optimized meaning suspension set up right weight, etc etc. Give them real good air and they turn times that make you wonder if somethings wrong when it may not be. Not everyone tells you all they do

Theres a user I think called Neat whos running 11x at close to 120 wiht the hotcam but hes had hundreds of passes and has been through the whole car head to tail.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2014 | 07:30 PM
  #14  
HellTeeOne's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I'd put the car on a dyno with a competent tuner first, and go from there.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2014 | 09:09 AM
  #15  
Rob's Avatar
Rob
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 6
From: Diamondhead, MS
Default

You need gears. 3.42's are just too tall for that cam. 4.10's are perfect. I used to shift 6300 on the tach which was about 61-6150 actual. Gears will be a HUGE improvement.

Looking back on my old timeslips, I used to run 10.4-10.5@1000' at MIR. That was on a 1.7x short time with 275/40/17 Nitto DRs.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2014 | 11:22 PM
  #16  
vtec's Avatar
Resident Racing Jerk
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: sc
Default

Originally Posted by Rob
You need gears. 3.42's are just too tall for that cam. 4.10's are perfect. I used to shift 6300 on the tach which was about 61-6150 actual. Gears will be a HUGE improvement.

Looking back on my old timeslips, I used to run 10.4-10.5@1000' at MIR. That was on a 1.7x short time with 275/40/17 Nitto DRs.
i think my m6/3.42 geared '93 went an 8.1@88 on some worn out 275/40/17 summitomo's. had 230/236 cam, and had the rear seat out. 1.95ish 60'. went 7.9@92 on some et streets. i just cant see the 3.42's making his car THAT slow. my car was faster bone stock.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2014 | 06:59 AM
  #17  
Rob's Avatar
Rob
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 6
From: Diamondhead, MS
Default

Originally Posted by vtec
i think my m6/3.42 geared '93 went an 8.1@88 on some worn out 275/40/17 summitomo's. had 230/236 cam, and had the rear seat out. 1.95ish 60'. went 7.9@92 on some et streets. i just cant see the 3.42's making his car THAT slow. my car was faster bone stock.
93 had different gearing than 94+.

Bone stock in 96, mine ran 8.7@82 and 11.3 in the 1000' and 13.5@104. It was one of the fastest stock ones back then.

Back in 98 or 99, there was a local guy that put a HOT cam in his Camaro but still had 2.73 gears(A4), it was slower than when he was stock. So it can happen. Once he changed the gears, he was finally happy because the car pulled like it was supposed to.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2014 | 07:31 AM
  #18  
madmike9396's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 220
From: North Carolina
Default

if you get that crappy 60ft down it would be a low 13 sec car maybe even a high 12.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2014 | 09:41 AM
  #19  
vtec's Avatar
Resident Racing Jerk
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: sc
Default

Originally Posted by Rob
93 had different gearing than 94+.
i know this... still dont see a 3.42 hotcam car trapping the same as a stock 3.42 car. the thing should have another 40hp once it gets moving at the top of 1st gear over a stock car. a converter would help more than swapping gears on a hotcam'd auto.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2014 | 11:03 AM
  #20  
HellTeeOne's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Rob
93 had different gearing than 94+.

Bone stock in 96, mine ran 8.7@82 and 11.3 in the 1000' and 13.5@104. It was one of the fastest stock ones back then.
Mine was running 13.4 at 104 with nothing but a CAI and catback. It ran 13.2 at 106 when I added MAC mids and ORY.

A full bolt on car with a hotcam should be trapping 108+. He has issues somewhere.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.

story-0
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-04 18:13:20


VIEW MORE
story-1
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-2
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-3
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-4
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-6
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-9
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE