Camshaft options
I mean for power gains and better drivability.
My car has hot cam package in it. 335rwhp/335tq. But I wish it has smoother idle, I'm not sure if its cam specs or tune related.
1994 corvette.
However, chances are the idle is tune related. The hot cam should have a really smooth idle.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I think there is a version of the CC503 that is 114. Seems like I remember Shbox having that version of the CC503. That might give a little smoother idle.
Are you looking to quiet the car down?
A cam change is a big effort just to smooth out the idle a little bit.
I have the CC503 with an LSA of 112(just like the hotcam) and I don't consider the idle to be all that rough. Got a hint of lope to make some one raise an eyebrow and know the car is not stock.
Here is a compare of my '96 stock and with the CC503. It's not a heck of a big difference. The pro mag rockers clicking seem to be the biggest change in the engine bay.
Stock:
CC503:
Last edited by ACE1252; Sep 6, 2015 at 06:19 PM.
Thanks for the advice
A cam change is a big effort just to smooth out the idle a little bit.
I have the CC503 with an LSA of 112(just like the hotcam) and I don't consider the idle to be all that rough. Got a hint of lope to make some one raise an eyebrow and know the car is not stock.
Here is a compare of my '96 stock and with the CC503. It's not a heck of a big difference. The pro mag rockers clicking seem to be the biggest change in the engine bay.
Yes, more quiet is what I wanted.
Considering the cam swap effort,time and tuning. I'm mostly will change my mind on this.
Maybe I should have not driven a stock C4 and compare it to mine !! It was quiet and very friendly for DD. lol
Spreading the LSA compromises torque, better to just stay smaller. 112lsa is already pretty wide, yes it is typical of catalog cams but it is wide when you consider the majority of quick NA cars are more like 108-109. Yes this lopes more. Point being 112 is already spread wide.
Friend had the 503 on 114lsa and it didn't work worth a damn.
Overlap = ((.050 duration intake + .050 duration exhaust)/2) - (LSA*2)
I think there is a version of the CC503 that is 114. Seems like I remember Shbox having that version of the CC503. That might give a little smoother idle.
Are you looking to quiet the car down?
A cam change is a big effort just to smooth out the idle a little bit.
I have the CC503 with an LSA of 112(just like the hotcam) and I don't consider the idle to be all that rough. Got a hint of lope to make some one raise an eyebrow and know the car is not stock.
Here is a compare of my '96 stock and with the CC503. It's not a heck of a big difference. The pro mag rockers clicking seem to be the biggest change in the engine bay.
Stock:
1996 Camaro Z28 walkaround testing Nikon camera.... - YouTube
CC503:
HD Video 1996 Camaro Z28 - Kooks Long Tube Headers - YouTube
and you must have cats on your exhaust system. I have 11:7:1 SCR, 503 with 1.6 rollers as well with magnaflow exhaust (more quite than flowmater) and mine sounds way more Lopey and loud than yours. Kinda like it though, sleeper style
Now, if you are having driveability issues, that is another issue altogether. We would need to see a full list of mods the car has to better understand what might be wrong with it.
I don't have the cam experience of many here but if the OP is having issues, it's got to be the car setup/tune. No way the LT4 hotcam should have any major driveability issues. I might expect it to have a problem on tip in at low speeds in a parking lot when letting it chug along with the IAC controlling thing(like my CC503). Other than that, it should idle close to stock and have much more power with all the supporting intake, exhaust, and rocker mods.
In any event, I don't thing the OP needs to change the cam. Adjust the setup? Most likely, but I don't think he needs to go crazy with a cam change if he is happy with the power. His tune might need some work depending on who done it.
Now, one thing he might be feeling is the loss of low end torque compared to a stock C4. I felt the same thing when I went to the CC503 from stock. I think my tune is playing into that some(it still needs work). However, the power from 3500 on up more than makes up for what little I lost on the bottom end of the rev range. Thing pulls LS like all the way to 6300.
Last edited by ACE1252; Sep 8, 2015 at 12:16 AM.
Now, if you are having driveability issues, that is another issue altogether. We would need to see a full list of mods the car has to better understand what might be wrong with it.
In any event, I don't thing the OP needs to change the cam. Adjust the setup? Most likely, but I don't think he needs to go crazy with a cam change if he is happy with the power. His tune might need some work depending on who done it.
I've changed my mind on this. I will not bother changing the cam, i will be paying for new cam , labor work and tune. Tune is hard to find here for LT cars. and will lose power !!





