LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Help getting correct pushrod!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2016 | 10:42 PM
  #1  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default Help getting correct pushrod!!!

I need to find the correct pushrod length for my build. I have the comp high tech pushrod length checker that measures from 6.8-7.8 inches.
The more i read the more confusing it gets.

My parts- new comp 850 lifters installed, custom cam, pac 1218 springs installed, and gm 1.6 roller rockers with poly locks.
Any good advice how to go about getting the correct rod length would be appreciated. I understand how to use the exhaust open, intake closed cam base circle method and how to find 0 lash. This is where my knowledge ends unfortunately
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 05:16 AM
  #2  
atlantadan's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 471
Likes: 14
From: Tucker, GA
Default

http://www.hotrod.com/articles/how-t...ngth-pushrods/

Or get one of these and do
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 08:28 AM
  #3  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

So you spin the motor at 0 lash, you dont add any lifter preload by tightning the rocker nut?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 10:13 AM
  #4  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

I don't think you'll be far off the stock length of 7.2". If you have an original PR, check the sweep and see if it's necessary to adjust the length.

http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ctrp-...rain-geometry/
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

7.05 sweep, unmarked pic is 7.1 inches. Seems to get the same sweep with 0 preload or one full turn of preload.
Attached Thumbnails Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_113202.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_105858.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 11:46 AM
  #6  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

You want the sweep to be off center more on the exhaust side.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 12:57 PM
  #7  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

So are you saying the 7.1 is better than the 7.05?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 01:29 PM
  #8  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

Pic of 7.05 with 0 preload. Pic of 7.05 with 1 turn of preload on 850 lifters.
Pic of 7.1 with 0 preload. And pic of 7.1 with 1 turn of preload.
Which gives the best pattern?
This is with the comp high tech pushrod measuring tool.
Attached Thumbnails Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_141759.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_140405.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_141036.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_141655.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 02:01 PM
  #9  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

I'd do a 7.2 just for ***** and giggles to see what's up. Yes, the 7.1 has a good, narrow sweep on the exhaust side so that would be the one I'd use if the 7.2 is no good.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 02:18 PM
  #10  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

Alright thanks for the info. I will post up pics of the 7.2 in awhile for the hell of it. I remember the 7.2 being to long though.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 05:05 PM
  #11  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

7.0 through 7.15. Looks like 7.05 is money with the most centered patten.
Attached Thumbnails Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_165148.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_165812.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_170149.jpg   Help getting correct pushrod!!!-20161012_170537.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 05:12 PM
  #12  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

I'd do 7.1. Sweep is narrower and is not as centered.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

I did notice the 7.1 is narrower. But is it good that it extends more towards the exhaust side than the 7.05? Im thinking you are prob correct in that the 7.1 might be the ticket. I didn't use a solid lifter for this but rather the actual comp 850 lifter set at one full turn preload with my pac 1218 spring already on the heads. Ohh well it seems close!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 10:34 AM
  #14  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

The way I understand it is you want to use the narrowest sweep possible. This means the rocker is opening/closing the valve in the most efficient manner. And if that sweep is not exactly on center then you want it to favor the exhaust side.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 10:58 AM
  #15  
BALLSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,985
Likes: 112
Default

^^^^this
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 11:00 PM
  #16  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

Okay that makes sense thanks. Def the 7.1 then! Pushrods are my last piece of the puzzle then i can get this thing on the road for a few weeks before winter hits.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2016 | 08:44 AM
  #17  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

SSRRR is correct, you want the sweep as narrow as possible while not on the edge of the valve stem. That gives the least friction and theoretically the most power and lowest wear. Ideally it would be a narrow line off center to the exh side.

Your 7.1 looks on the money .
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2016 | 06:36 PM
  #18  
350 groundpounder's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 28
From: Michigan
Default

Cool thanks. I need to use a old stock lifter and make it solid also. I will still prob get 7.1.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 11:17 AM
  #19  
BALLSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,985
Likes: 112
Default

If you used the Proform tool shown in video, you don't need to make a solid lifter.

7.100 is a very common PR size for people with rebuilt motors where the block & heads have been decked. Obviously you still need to measure PR length but from the pics the 7.100" size is the winner
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.