LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

E85 on NA 383 lt1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 09:11 AM
  #41  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Don't worry Dick, I only have a 9.5scr and mid 20s WOT timing
.. .and your **** is a turd.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 08:15 PM
  #42  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01






None of the above at all will be an issue, I have been running purely E85 for 10 years in my 95 TA. Still on stock fuel lines, and only upgrading the fuel pump and injectors. Internally E85 is not corrosive whatsoever to intake, heads, pistons, rings, valves, etc. Flex fuel engines are built the same as gasoline engines, with the exception of the fuel system, sensor, and tune. Actually, internally your engine will run cleaner with less carbon deposits on the pistons and heads than with gasoline, since E85 burns cleaner than gasoline. Here is a pic of my pistons of 2.5 years of use when I upgraded my top end:
I don't wish to dissuade the original poster but I can't verify if the engine pictured has been using E85 for 10 years or has been using E10 with frequent fuel additive maintenance to remove the same deposits inside your engine, especially to clean off the piston heads! Yes, alcohol fuel burns cleaner which in theory helps an engine maintain it's fuel economy rating from when it was brand new off the assembly line and it helps keep all emissions equipment clean as well, adding to their longevity. Furthermore, you effectively extend engine oil life by using cleaner burning fuel. I have read plenty on this subject so I dare not question the engineers and know-how of some of those whose statements were used in such articles I read. I am just saying, I would be worried to use E85 which is why Iso-Butanol draws me in, but I don't want to hijack this post.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 08:26 PM
  #43  
BTC's Avatar
BTC
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 18
From: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Default

You don't want to dissuade the OP, but

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I think this is a bad idea and it will destroy your engine!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 08:44 PM
  #44  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I would be worried to use E85 which is why Iso-Butanol draws me in but I don't want to hijack this post.
You sound very paranoid and as far as the hijacking part.... You did that when you started talking about how bad e85 is and how it wasn't designed for the engine lol

I knew you had no personal experience as soon as I read
"I think this is a bad idea and it will destroy your engine! For any conventional internal combustion engine, the absolute highest level of ethanol you can mix in gasoline is 15%, afterwards you need your fuel system and engine components fortified against the corrosive property of ethanol"

Last edited by LLLosingit; Oct 19, 2018 at 08:54 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 09:04 PM
  #45  
kgkern01's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 996
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I don't wish to dissuade the original poster but I can't verify if the engine pictured has been using E85 for 10 years or has been using E10 with frequent fuel additive maintenance to remove the same deposits inside your engine, especially to clean off the piston heads! Yes, alcohol fuel burns cleaner which in theory helps an engine maintain it's fuel economy rating from when it was brand new off the assembly line and it helps keep all emissions equipment clean as well, adding to their longevity. Furthermore, you effectively extend engine oil life by using cleaner burning fuel. I have read plenty on this subject so I dare not question the engineers and know-how of some of those whose statements were used in such articles I read. I am just saying, I would be worried to use E85 which is why Iso-Butanol draws me in, but I don't want to hijack this post.
You can’t verify the pic, but I can because I took the pic during my top end swap, which I stated in the post. and my car has been ran exclusively on E85 since 2008 . You may have no experience with E85, but I have 10 years of experience, and know all of the facts both good and bad, and from experience, not just internet research. So I agree, don’t dissuade the OP from a fuel you have zero experience with but others on this post have and have commented their actual experience with.
Side note, I have started looking into iso-butanol as well, for use in my boat, but it is still a few years off as well before it becomes readily available unfortunately.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 03:57 PM
  #46  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by BTC
You don't want to dissuade the OP, but
I am just giving the original poster my honest thoughts, my honest two cents! So, if you have a comment in favor of E85 you are warmly received whereas if you have a comment to the contrary everyone must gang up on you? Is that how discussions and debates are to be held on this forum? The original poster has been given my tale of caution about using E85 on an engine that was not designed to run on it. This is not internet hearsay, either, not from chemists and engineers! If the original poster still wishes to use E85 in his LT1 engine, he needs to have it built like a flex-fuel engine with the same fuel system and components that won't suffer from Ethanol corrosion as would a gasoline dedicated engine from the 90s that was designed in the 1980s.

He has my blessing to use E85, but for the sake of his engine, it's needs more than just a program tune.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 04:01 PM
  #47  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01


You can’t verify the pic, but I can because I took the pic during my top end swap, which I stated in the post. and my car has been ran exclusively on E85 since 2008 . You may have no experience with E85, but I have 10 years of experience, and know all of the facts both good and bad, and from experience, not just internet research. So I agree, don’t dissuade the OP from a fuel you have zero experience with but others on this post have and have commented their actual experience with.
Side note, I have started looking into iso-butanol as well, for use in my boat, but it is still a few years off as well before it becomes readily available unfortunately.
Just because someone shows a picture of an engine does not mean that what they are saying is legit! Furthermore, I can't ignore the chemical properties of Ethanol and the fact that it is clearly stated to have corrosive properties which is why conventional engines can not use more than 15% Ethanol blended fuels! If you start to put this information together followed by all the hear-say on the internet, you can figure out why using E85 in a conventional gasoline engine might be a bad idea!

They currently sell Iso-butanol as a solvent for chemicals. You can purchase it this way, only, the added cost to get it trucked if, I assume, by a drum, will make the fuel nearly cost prohibitive. Unless you live near a company that produces Iso-Butanol and you can pick the stuff up yourself. If you are determined to use this fuel there are ways to get it right now. Have you contacted GEVO about how you could purchase this fuel while it is not readily available? I seriously doubt your resolve to use this fuel.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #48  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I am just giving the original poster my honest thoughts, my honest two cents! So, if you have a comment in favor of E85 you are warmly received whereas if you have a comment to the contrary everyone must gang up on you? Is that how discussions and debates are to be held on this forum? The original poster has been given my tale of caution about using E85 on an engine that was not designed to run on it. This is not internet hearsay, either, not from chemists and engineers! If the original poster still wishes to use E85 in his LT1 engine, he needs to have it built like a flex-fuel engine with the same fuel system and components that won't suffer from Ethanol corrosion as would a gasoline dedicated engine from the 90s that was designed in the 1980s.

He has my blessing to use E85, but for the sake of his engine, it's needs more than just a program tune.
Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I can't ignore the chemical properties of Ethanol and the fact that it is clearly stated to have corrosive properties which is why conventional engines can not use more than 15% Ethanol blended fuels! If you start to put this information together followed by all the hear-say on the internet, you can figure out why using E85 in a conventional gasoline engine might be a bad idea!
.
What everyone here has been trying to point out is that you keep saying the engine isn't designed to run e-85 and that's not exactly true, Nothing but the injectors need to be changed on the engine because they won't flow enough fuel for E85, The reason you're not supposed to run E85 on older vehicles is because (1) They do not have a sensor to measure ethanol content (2) The fuel system can't provide enough flow for the added fuel volume needed so the fuel pump and injectors need to be upgraded.

Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 05:49 PM
  #49  
kgkern01's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 996
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
What everyone here has been trying to point out is that you keep saying the engine isn't designed to run e-85 and that's not exactly true, Nothing but the injectors need to be changed on the engine because they won't flow enough fuel for E85, The reason you're not supposed to run E85 on older vehicles is because (1) They do not have a sensor to measure ethanol content (2) The fuel system can't provide enough flow for the added fuel volume needed so the fuel pump and injectors need to be upgraded.
^THIS!

All that is in fact required to convert, on. 4th gen Fbody, which is the vehicle in question, is injectors, fuel pump, and proper tune, preferably with a wideband, and he’s ready to safely and reliably run E85.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 05:58 PM
  #50  
Shownomercy's Avatar
Man-Crush Warning
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I am just giving the original poster my honest thoughts, my honest two cents! So, if you have a comment in favor of E85 you are warmly received whereas if you have a comment to the contrary everyone must gang up on you? Is that how discussions and debates are to be held on this forum? The original poster has been given my tale of caution about using E85 on an engine that was not designed to run on it. This is not internet hearsay, either, not from chemists and engineers! If the original poster still wishes to use E85 in his LT1 engine, he needs to have it built like a flex-fuel engine with the same fuel system and components that won't suffer from Ethanol corrosion as would a gasoline dedicated engine from the 90s that was designed in the 1980s.

He has my blessing to use E85, but for the sake of his engine, it's needs more than just a program tune.
Everyone is ganging up on you cause you speak of something you know nothing of except from what you have correlated from book reading.

Real life knowledge always trumps the black and white of book info.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 06:17 PM
  #51  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Everyone is ganging up on you cause you speak of something you know nothing of except from what you have correlated from book reading.

Real life knowledge always trumps the black and white of book info.
Ding ding, we have a winner.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 07:27 PM
  #52  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01
All that is in fact required to convert, on. 4th gen Fbody, which is the vehicle in question, is injectors, fuel pump, and proper tune, preferably with a wideband, and he’s ready to safely and reliably run E85.
So, does the original poster have these modifications already? Thank you for helping to verify what I am trying to say the original poster needs, an E85 conversion kit for the second-gen LT1 engine.

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Everyone is ganging up on you cause you speak of something you know nothing of except from what you have correlated from book reading.

Real life knowledge always trumps the black and white of book info.
One of your own just admitted that the LT1 engine NEEDS MODIFICATIONS to safely run E85 whilst you others claim the LT1 needs no modifications! Real life knowledge? More like disinformation that could screw up a fellow member's engine! I hear those bells ringing now!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 08:23 PM
  #53  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
So, does the original poster have these modifications already? Thank you for helping to verify what I am trying to say the original poster needs, an E85 conversion kit for the second-gen LT1 engine.



One of your own just admitted that the LT1 engine NEEDS MODIFICATIONS to safely run E85 whilst you others claim the LT1 needs no modifications! Real life knowledge? More like disinformation that could screw up a fellow member's engine! I hear those bells ringing now!
Changing injectors is not modifying the engine it's modifying the fuel system as I and others have pointed out numerous times. You just continue to make yourself look foolish. The OP already has aftermarket pump and injectors as he stated in his first post, He also asked if it was worth switching to E85. He did not ask if he could run E85 on the stock fuel system lol
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 08:37 PM
  #54  
kgkern01's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 996
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
Changing injectors is not modifying the engine it's modifying the fuel system as I and others have pointed out numerous times. You just continue to make yourself look foolish. The OP already has aftermarket pump and injectors as he stated in his first post, He also asked if it was worth switching to E85. He did not ask if he could run E85 on the stock fuel system lol
:thumbs: This. Injectors, fuel pump, and tune are not engine mods.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 08:41 PM
  #55  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
Changing injectors is not modifying the engine it's modifying the fuel system as I and others have pointed out numerous times. You just continue to make yourself look foolish. The OP already has aftermarket pump and injectors as he stated in his first post, He also asked if it was worth switching to E85. He did not ask if he could run E85 on the stock fuel system lol
I don't care about how I look to anyone on this site. As long as the original poster is set-up for E85 use, that is all that matters. Foolish commenting or not, his engine and fuel system need modification, even if it means changing injectors and tuning the PCM for E85.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 08:46 PM
  #56  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01
If you want to know what is involved in converting over to E85, I'll tell you what you need to convert. For the fuel lines, most vehicles after around 1990 have fuel systems that can handle ethanol, ours included. So for the fuel lines they are fine. However, the fuel pump does need upgraded, along with the injectors. I have ran Ford Cobra 39# injectors, when I was just bolt-ons, then I upgraded to 63# Siemens injectors when I went to cam/mild heads, and now with my forged 385. I've been running the 63# Siemens injectors for about 6 years now, and just sent them off last year to have them cleaned/flow-tested, and they all tested within 1-4% of new before cleaning, and all tested as new afterwards. The fuel pressure regulator, I have had one go out, it does use a rubber diaphragm, but 1 in 10 years on E85 isn't bad, so I may recommend an aftermarket here just for the non-rubber diaphragm if you wanted to be cautious, even though it still lasted a long time with the stock one. Fuel pump wise, I have gone through 2 fuel pumps over the 10 years, a Walbro 255 and a knock-off. The Walbro did last about 6 years, the knock off, about 2 before getting weak, (I highly recommend the trap door mod, btw), I recently upgraded this year to a higher flow E85 pump recently with hotwire kit, so this one should last much longer. For oil changes, I change around 2500 miles and use Rotella T6.
You will have to tune for the higher flow rate and AFR obviously. If using the LT1 computer, the way to do it is to "trick" it to supply more fuel by commanding a smaller injector size than you are currently running. I highly recommend investing in a wideband so that you can adjust the injector level accordingly as well as your PE tables. One way to start is to divide your injector size by 1.3 (30%) and use that number to start. Then doing some highway cruising, try to adjust the injector rate until your BLM's are as close to 128 as you can get, and your AFR with a wideband should be showing 14.7 if calibrated for gasoline, 9.8 if calibrated for E85. Around .8 lambda is what you want at WOT for your AFR.
If you swap to an LS computer setup, find a compatible one from a truck that Flex-fuel tables enabled, and you can run the Ethanol sensor and not have to worry about this step. This is what I am changing to next year. The nice thing about E85 being an oxygenated fuel, is it has a wider sweet spot for best WOT AFR. Also, E85 runs very consistent at the track. As far as the engine goes, the more compression you can run the better, as E85 is very resistant to detonation, and has been tested up in the 15's NA, setup dependent of course. Running NA you won't gain too much from it, maybe 2-3% unless you increase your compression, as that is where some of the gain of the fuel comes from, the ability to run more compression and timing than you can with gasoline, although the cooler intake, burn, and exhaust temps help as well. At 11:1 compression you aren't too much over stock compression, so you will gain some but you are leaving power on the table staying so low, even running premium gasoline with our reverse cooled LT's you can go higher than that. Bump that compression up around 12+ and you will gain even more from the fuel switch.

Now everything does have a down side, so here are the downsides to running E85. Less fuel mileage is the obvious one, since E85 burns at 9.8 stoich instead of 14.7 stoich it requires more fuel. However it does run much cheaper than premium, so it usually ends up being cheaper to run. Another downside to this is reduced range though. On our small gas tanks, the 30% or so reduction in mileage means your tank runs out that much more often, which can get annoying having to fill up so often, and having to plan any long distance drives around E85 stations. Another is the injector tip/valve gumming issue. E85 has a tendency to create this tar-like gumming on the tip of the injectors and sometimes on the valves as a result of contact with the carbon mist in the intake from oil. So while E85 will keep your fuel system very clean, this is a not often discussed issue that you may encounter. Brake clean or injector cleaner doesn't easily dissolve it, however, gasoline does very easily dissolve it. So if you occasionally pull your injectors and clean the tips with gasoline (very easy to do), or swap back to your gas tune once every few fill ups, you can help avoid this issue as well. That is all I can think of to get you started at the moment, if you have any other questions, don't hesitate to ask or shoot me a PM.
Enough said.

Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 10:22 PM
  #57  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I don't care about how I look to anyone on this site. As long as the original poster is set-up for E85 use, that is all that matters. Foolish commenting or not, his engine and fuel system need modification, even if it means changing injectors and tuning the PCM for E85.
Remember your first post?
Originally Posted by Phoenix'97
I think this is a bad idea and it will destroy your engine! you need your fuel system and engine components fortified against the corrosive property of ethanol.
Ok so what needs changing on the engine itself? Not counting the injectors...they are part of the fuel system, No counting the tune because that's not part of the engine either.
Nothing on the engine needs to be modified to run E85, Only the fuel system and that's more because of fuel volume requirements than anything and the tune because of the changing fuel needs of the engine. So what actual engine mods are needed?

PS Ethanol is not that corrosive, Methanol will eat away at aluminum unless it's hard anodized where Ethanol does not. You can have E85 in an aluminum fuel cell for years and see no corrosion damage yet methanol will start etching it within a few weeks.
How many cars do you have running E85 ? I'm still betting you have none and never had a single one.

Reply
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 10:43 PM
  #58  
Phoenix'97's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
Remember your first post?


Ok so what needs changing on the engine itself? Not counting the injectors...they are part of the fuel system, No counting the tune because that's not part of the engine either.
Nothing on the engine needs to be modified to run E85, Only the fuel system and that's more because of fuel volume requirements than anything and the tune because of the changing fuel needs of the engine. So what actual engine mods are needed?

PS Ethanol is not that corrosive, Methanol will eat away at aluminum unless it's hard anodized where Ethanol does not. You can have E85 in an aluminum fuel cell for years and see no corrosion damage yet methanol will start etching it within a few weeks.
How many cars do you have running E85 ? I'm still betting you have none and never had a single one.
The fuel injectors are on the engine and the fuel injectors need to be changed to use E85. However, lets not make this a debate on semantics or merely an argument of "I am right and you are wrong". Everything that kgkern01 has mentioned confirms the necessary level of modification required, to a stock engine, to allow it to use E85, along with the caveat of how to clean the tips of the fuel injectors since Ethanol gunks up.

Ethanol is corrosive and we are not talking about methanol here. I don't plan to ever use E85 in my car, the money required to make my car flex-fuel capable is better spent on other modifications and using an alcohol fuel that doesn't require the modifications that E85 requires. Furthermore, fuel mileage is going to suffer when using E85, and I drive in the winter so that will be a double whammy. With Iso-Butanol the fuel mileage loss will be considerably less and when paired with a compression increase to offset the loss.

I have given my perspective and opinion and the original poster's question has been answered.

Reply
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 07:25 AM
  #59  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

It's pretty disappointing that Phoenix is so arrogant he can't just leave it alone. Everyone else knows that a fuel system upgrade is not an engine modification and frankly is a trivial upgrade when it comes to modifying a car, but just can't admit it and insists on babbling on about information that is not pertinent to the discussion.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 05:03 PM
  #60  
CamOnlyJabroni's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 321
Likes: 88
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

It’s so difficult to run e85 I even leave it in the tank all winter and it’s fine in the Spring.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE