cc306 specs?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
I ran mine with out heads. I dynoed 350 rwhp through shitty midlength headers at MMT in rockwall tx. I was leaning out bad too. I defently recomend a tune with this cam. While you can drive it with out it it sucks. I got 9 miles to the gallon and the funmes where pretty rough do defently get a tune. 
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Regina, SK
Originally Posted by mrhawk
I ran mine with out heads. I dynoed 350 rwhp through shitty midlength headers at MMT in rockwall tx. I was leaning out bad too. I defently recomend a tune with this cam. While you can drive it with out it it sucks. I got 9 miles to the gallon and the funmes where pretty rough do defently get a tune.
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 3
From: NYC metro area
Originally Posted by John95Z28
So with a cc306 cam and otherwise stock motor ("shitty" headers probably don't add any performance compared to stock) you can make 350 rwhp? Is that typical results with the cc306?
