LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

convert a 400 block to lt1?

Old Oct 4, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #21  
SSmoky01's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Looks like my 401 answer was wrong. My bad.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #22  
Vendetta's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 3
From: NYC metro area
Default

An acquantence of mine just had a 410ci LT1 built.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:48 PM
  #23  
1BadAsZ's Avatar
Launching!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Florence, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Nick@AP-Engineering
I'm shakey on what your asking so I'll do my best to answer. I've seen as much as 400rwhp N/A on our Mustang Dyno from a well built 11:1 396ci LT1. That being said, the LT1 v.s. LT4 intake debate has been going on forever. The LT4 intake simply has more "meat" for you to port with than the LT1 does. Outside of that there aren't any big differences.

Give us a call at the shop, and we can give you a few options to choose from. We have the best shortblock pricing out there.
400rwhp? thats all? i have seen guys with stock bottom ends with head n cam packages make right at 400 if not 400. im not knocking anyone or anything like that cause i dont know a whole lot about engines. i just thought it would be higher then that but i know that also depends on the combination of parts you go with
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 04:00 PM
  #24  
94Formula/TA's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 1BadAsZ
400rwhp? thats all? i have seen guys with stock bottom ends with head n cam packages make right at 400 if not 400. im not knocking anyone or anything like that cause i dont know a whole lot about engines. i just thought it would be higher then that but i know that also depends on the combination of parts you go with
You missed the skank dyno part of his post they read more accurate then dynojet's(therefore lower).

Rich
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #25  
Uthinkso's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
From: Detroit,MI
Default

Exactly as stated above. For instance a car that makes 400rwhp on our Mustang Dyno, makes almost 440rwhp on a Dynojet just two miles away.


The two read differently is all. So 400rwhp N/A on a Mustang dyno is no slouch. Hell the car runs mid 11's on motor.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.