Pic of my new project (LT4 w/ "E" victor intake etc)
08-11-2005, 08:10 AM
#62
Originally Posted by taner
i have gone 9.60 on my stock pcm when ihad it. it looks great. i thought about that route as well. but went with the hogan
are there provisions for a fogger on this intake?
thanks
are there provisions for a fogger on this intake?
thanks
08-11-2005, 11:20 AM
#63
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arcanum, Ohio
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought i would ask but would this intake swap be a good idea or over kill for a stock bottom end heads and cam car. My heads flow 260,180 and my cam is 236/245 with 608/613 lift with 1.6 rr's on 112 lsa. It is a HR cam also. Thanks for any input.
08-11-2005, 01:30 PM
#64
I think this intake would help on just about any type of application for the most part I would say for your setup it would be more minimum, but you could always upgrade (more cubes, better heads) and still have the Single plain to work with your bigger and better flowing setip setup. Thats my opinion. BTW a single plain cam would be vastly different that a LTX intake cam. The duration, LSA, and Lift play a different role between the 2 intakes.
08-11-2005, 10:19 PM
#65
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice looking motor. look ssimilar to mine
click for pics
its for sale too
400ci afr 215RR heads. very nice solid roller setup.
low cr.
brook
click for pics
its for sale too
400ci afr 215RR heads. very nice solid roller setup.
low cr.
brook
08-12-2005, 05:08 PM
#66
aggie wnat intake are you using the Victor E, Super vic, or the Victor JR. Brett Bauer said that the Super vic was the best out of all of them, but it is a little taller, I am just looking to see if a Super vic with a Milled elbow with fit under my LS1 Ws6 front clip that I have on my car.
08-12-2005, 08:34 PM
#68
8 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: elgin il
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by T/A KID
aggie wnat intake are you using the Victor E, Super vic, or the Victor JR. Brett Bauer said that the Super vic was the best out of all of them, but it is a little taller, I am just looking to see if a Super vic with a Milled elbow with fit under my LS1 Ws6 front clip that I have on my car.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/827450/2
08-12-2005, 09:29 PM
#69
Hey Z8's Did you have the elbow milled at all. What does your INTAKE setup consist of. I think I see some type of Nirtous plate between the elbow and intake. I have been told the Super vic is appx 1 inch taller than the Victor E and JR versions. Brett told me he could get the super vic to work effeciant between the 2500-7000 RPM well, the super vic is 10lbs lighter and flows alot better than the other 2. I heard a few saying on camaroZ28.com (Squinn and altajar) that the Super vic with a milled elbow would fit under a stock trans am or Z28 LT1 hood. Again from your pics it looks like it sticks up quite a bit, but it looks like you have some goodies within the intake setup. Could you tell me your thoughts. Also, if you don't mind telling me but is that a 90 Accufab and a 100 degree wilson or 90. Just Trying to get and idea here. Thanks man BTW congrats on the 8's must be cool, lol
I like the front end for the IC, i think. anyhow just like to hear the answers to T/A's questions too. 
08-13-2005, 11:18 PM
#72
8 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: elgin il
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by T/A KID
Hey Z8's Did you have the elbow milled at all. What does your INTAKE setup consist of. I think I see some type of Nirtous plate between the elbow and intake. I have been told the Super vic is appx 1 inch taller than the Victor E and JR versions. Brett told me he could get the super vic to work effeciant between the 2500-7000 RPM well, the super vic is 10lbs lighter and flows alot better than the other 2. I heard a few saying on camaroZ28.com (Squinn and altajar) that the Super vic with a milled elbow would fit under a stock trans am or Z28 LT1 hood. Again from your pics it looks like it sticks up quite a bit, but it looks like you have some goodies within the intake setup. Could you tell me your thoughts. Also, if you don't mind telling me but is that a 90 Accufab and a 100 degree wilson or 90. Just Trying to get and idea here. Thanks man BTW congrats on the 8's must be cool, lol
08-13-2005, 11:22 PM
#73
8 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: elgin il
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by '68LT1camaro
Hey Z8's, what's your best time with that new motor?
Raymond
Raymond
currently working on my new car 99 formula with a blower on it .For the street
08-14-2005, 01:14 AM
#74
I'm a little lost here.......what happens to the MAF sensor????
and do you have to get the Victor E intake ported or does it flow 320+ cfm out the box??............seriously thinking of ditching my LT4intake for this set-up.......hoping they havent started the port job on it yet.
and do you have to get the Victor E intake ported or does it flow 320+ cfm out the box??............seriously thinking of ditching my LT4intake for this set-up.......hoping they havent started the port job on it yet.
08-14-2005, 01:47 AM
#75
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: pueblo west, co
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this setup with a nice 4 barrel tb sittin on top with a nice plate setup then add a dfi dual sync dist and dfi ecm controlling the whole thing oh man that may be something for my next tax return as i was already thinkin about doin a dfi setup next spring
mainly because i want to run a dist and get rid of my opti spark.
something to make me go HHHHHUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Z8's
i thought the vic e was the only one with injector bungs in it already or did yall have the super vic machined for the injectors?
everyone that has this setup in the thread very nice setup guys its nice to see some alternatives for the lt1/lt4 intakes that flow good and also that intake is alot better design for flow.
mainly because i want to run a dist and get rid of my opti spark.
something to make me go HHHHHUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Z8's
i thought the vic e was the only one with injector bungs in it already or did yall have the super vic machined for the injectors?
everyone that has this setup in the thread very nice setup guys its nice to see some alternatives for the lt1/lt4 intakes that flow good and also that intake is alot better design for flow.
08-14-2005, 09:17 AM
#76
Originally Posted by asudecat
I'm a little lost here.......what happens to the MAF sensor????
and do you have to get the Victor E intake ported or does it flow 320+ cfm out the box??............seriously thinking of ditching my LT4intake for this set-up.......hoping they havent started the port job on it yet.
and do you have to get the Victor E intake ported or does it flow 320+ cfm out the box??............seriously thinking of ditching my LT4intake for this set-up.......hoping they havent started the port job on it yet.
Well.....That depends on if you still have stock PCM or not. If you have stock pcm......you just include the MAF sensor in the tubing somerwhere between the T-body and the air filter. DFI, FAST systems are speed density and do not use MAF sensors. It utilizes the Volumetric Efficiency tables instead of MAF readings. You will need to port the runners of the Victor "E" intake to flow the upper cfm #'s.
08-14-2005, 10:24 AM
#77
Would this be a good idea for me if im trying to keep it streetable. And I mean this thing will prob get around 200 miles a week, driving to school and back. haha will I be ok with a 550rwhp beast like this on the streets everyday or should I stick with my LT4 set-up?
08-14-2005, 11:20 AM
#78
Originally Posted by Tony Shepherd
Well.....That depends on if you still have stock PCM or not. If you have stock pcm......you just include the MAF sensor in the tubing somerwhere between the T-body and the air filter. DFI, FAST systems are speed density and do not use MAF sensors. It utilizes the Volumetric Efficiency tables instead of MAF readings. You will need to port the runners of the Victor "E" intake to flow the upper cfm #'s.
Ed
08-14-2005, 12:37 PM
#79
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tony,
What is the part number for the accu fab throttle body. I have the exact same setup as yours and I am looking for a throttlebody.
Michael
Also, what do you have in the intake runner of number eight. Edelbrock has large hole tapped and by the looks of it you have something threaded into it.
What is the part number for the accu fab throttle body. I have the exact same setup as yours and I am looking for a throttlebody.
Michael
Also, what do you have in the intake runner of number eight. Edelbrock has large hole tapped and by the looks of it you have something threaded into it.
08-14-2005, 02:07 PM
#80
Originally Posted by Ed Wright
Tony, you don't have to use a MAF with the stock PCM, there is a bit you set to select speed density mode. You then use the VE tables there as well. I've been runing mine that way since last Nov. If I can get past the 7300 RPM limit, I'll keep the stock box in mine. If I can't spank that little 7300 deal by end of summer, I'll change it to a F.A.S.T. system for next year.
Ed
Ed
Thats right Ed...I forgot about that. I still us a MAF on mine. The ZO6 one works great.