LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

94-95 compared to 96-97

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2005 | 04:54 PM
  #21  
pillagenburn's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

wtf is the number to call chevy to give them your VIN anyway?

i wanna know this hehe....
Old 08-18-2005 | 05:16 PM
  #22  
Camaro 0wner's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Default

There isn't a specific number to call. Just call a chevy deal ship near you. They can search on there computers anywhere. They will ask for the last 8 numbers of your vin and will know everything about your car.
Old 08-18-2005 | 06:12 PM
  #23  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 13
Default

GM never weighed your car what they gave you was BASE curb weight which would be why it disagrees with what others are saying. Honestly if you want info about your car this is a better place than a dealer.
Old 08-18-2005 | 07:06 PM
  #24  
omaha stylee's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Honestly if you want info about your car this is a better place than a dealer.
sad but true.........
Old 08-18-2005 | 08:44 PM
  #25  
METALBEAST's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 0wner
A 94 Z28 weighs about 3306, while a 99+ GT weighs in around 3273-3317. In this case, I would think the weight wouldn't really matter...Personally, I thought it would all be about RWHP and driver.

Does anyone know what mph auto and manual GT's run "stock" in the quarter mile? Thanks

-Jay
Auto GTs seem to be significantly slower than M5 GTs.

99+ M5s can run anywhere from 14.2-13.8 @98-102
99+ Autos can run anywhere from 14.6-14.0@96-100

I've saw this at both the track and in several reputable Mustang magazines. Those times seem to be the norm
Old 08-18-2005 | 09:09 PM
  #26  
superGMman's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro(basically Oakland), CA
Default

Haven't you noticed that Ford has consistently produced bad AT's? Sucks for them, luckily us GM guys have the advantages of choosing an M6 or A4 without much sacrifice in power or performance at all. Stuff like that makes me feel better.



Quick Reply: 94-95 compared to 96-97



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.