LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Fleetwood LT1 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
85MonteCarloSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Default Fleetwood LT1 question

The only difference that I know between an Fbody LT1 and a Fleetwood LT1 is that it has cast iron heads. Do you think they are decent engines or do you think they are garbage? I am wondering because I have found a fleetwood with one for cheap and I plan to put a LT1 in my car by next July. Opinions anyone?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
buffman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
From: Kzoo, MI
Default

Besides cast iron heads they have a different cam, and I do believe the accessory layout is a little different. Power Rating from factory is 260hp and 330ft lbs of tq.

Matt
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #3  
dhdenney's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Kentucky
Default

If you're putting the motor in your Monte, I imagine the Fleetwood cam would be more suited to your car considering its weight (I imagine it to be heavier than an F body). Otherwise the block and all the internals are pretty much the same. If it were me, I wouldn't be able to swap it without modifying it so you can always improve it with heads and cam. As far as junk goes, just because it came out of a Fleetwood doesn't make it junk. It might even be in better shape cuz grandma probably never spun it to 5500+. I would say the accessories from your 305 should bolt up to the LT1.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #4  
buffman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
From: Kzoo, MI
Default

Originally Posted by dhdenney
If you're putting the motor in your Monte, I imagine the Fleetwood cam would be more suited to your car considering its weight (I imagine it to be heavier than an F body). Otherwise the block and all the internals are pretty much the same. If it were me, I wouldn't be able to swap it without modifying it so you can always improve it with heads and cam. As far as junk goes, just because it came out of a Fleetwood doesn't make it junk. It might even be in better shape cuz grandma probably never spun it to 5500+. I would say the accessories from your 305 should bolt up to the LT1.
Yeah. The LT1s in the B-body and D-body (fleetwood) are redlined at 5500rpm so they don't see a lot of high rpm use from Grandma. I do believe the D-body weighs in at around 4900lbs.
Matt
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #5  
rebersole2's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Amite, La
Default

I run a carb conversioned/ cam swapped 1995 Fleetwood motor in a 1986 Camaro and have to say that for the simplicity of it, I am impressed.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 01:09 AM
  #6  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 36
From: T56th Street, Aridzona
Thumbs up

you're better off with the f-body accessory bracket as most (all I've ever seen / done) clear the g-body frame & let the belt be changed, whereas the b-body one is just a tiny bit closer to the frame rail with the AC pulley.

Other than that, give it a little bit of extra cam and go with the iron LT1. The heads flow slightly better. Upgrade later.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.