Double Roller timing set question?
I know that it will work on my 95 however, a friend wants to install a double roller on his 93.
Thanks
Mike
http://www.cmotorsports.com/93-97-fb...ine-timingsets
Why?
-The 1992-1994 LT1 cam gear had a slot in the center to accept the splined opti driveshaft. Without that exact style cam gear, your optispark will cease to function. The Cloyes 3145 simply will not accommodate a pre-95 optispark, since the center hole is enlarged & without splines.
-Beyond that, the Cloyes 9-3145 cam gear will not have the unique LT1 waterpump drive teeth on the back, thus rendering your factory internally-driven waterpump useless. That's where the electric waterpump comes in.
--------------------------
As I see it, you have four options as far as timing sets are concerned:
1) Buy a new stock-replacement 1993 GM timing set.
2) Try the $400 Cloyes '92-'94 timing set from More Performance.
3) Shell out $550 for the custom '92-'94 LT1 Doug Rippie timing set.
4) Spend the money to convert to a 1995+ camshaft/optispark/opti wiring harness/vacuum hoses/timing cover. Then you have the option of running the LT1/LT4 HD timing set. Or, if you add an electric waterpump to that list, you can run virtually any 1987+ SBC timing set.
If you need any part numbers, let me know...
-Alex
For this reason, I really wouldn't consider them -- if you were crazy enough to consider them in the first place, given the pricetag. Just letting you know your options...
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I have a '96 and had to switch to a '94 style hub with the double roller.
That's what i'm trying to find out...Why do you need to switch to the 94 style? Why can't you use the 95-97 style. Just trying to get my information straight before i order a timing set this week.
The double-roller crank gear is thicker, which might not allow enough space for the crank sensor behind the timing cover. In which case, the crank sensor would need to be removed & disabled. The electrical connector port for the crank sensor would also need to be sealed, unless you swap over to a 1995 cover.
As far as the hubs are concerned, I know that the 1996-1997 LT1 hubs were shorter to accommodate the crank sensor/reluctor wheel. Perhaps the longer '93-95 hubs are required to compensate & maintain pulley/belt alignment with the crank sensor removed?
Just an assumption. Perhaps someone else can clarify.




