LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

What Cam For My Forged 383??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2006, 07:05 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
97M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 1,838
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

236/245 duration, .569"/.580",114 or 115lsa i have a very similar cam in my 6 speed 383 and it pulls 14hg vacuum and is still very drivable on the street. It would also do well on a blower/nitrous car. Just my opinion though i am by no means as knowledgable as Bret(sstrokerace) or Joe O. when it comes to cams but my car made good na power and awesome on the juice
Old 04-05-2006, 07:31 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a CC extreme engery 230/236 with 112 LSA in my 383. Got some AFR 195 CC heads with 64 CC chambers. JE pistons with 10.5 compression. Before I chose my cam I spoke to Dave @ AFR and he told me not to go to big on the @.50 split(I/E). Anything bigger would hurt my performance.

Anyways here is my setup. Motor should be going in this weekend,

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-modifications/466469-what-kinda-numbers-can-i-expect-383-1996-formula-ws6.html
Old 04-06-2006, 08:31 AM
  #23  
Moderator
iTrader: (242)
 
JasonShort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,810
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

T/A KID, you cant compare LS1 to LT1. The LS1s always use cams with less split due to the exhaust side of the head being alot better than the comparable LT1. That is why LS1s could get away with reverse split pattern cams.

The LT1s need more exhaust duration than the LS1s.

Jason
Old 04-06-2006, 11:08 AM
  #24  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by T/A KID
Bret I have been reseaching a lot of your threads and numerous others on Blower cams, From what I see a lot of people say run a wide I/E ratio dealing with duration (anywhere from 10,12+ split)
But lately I see a lot of guys going fast with smaller splits like around a 4-6 degree split especially the LS1 guys. Kp on this board (director in the forced induction section runs 9.48's at 144 with a tiny 204/211 01 Zo6 cam with out of the box Dart 225, forged 347 Ls1, 12.5 lbs of boost on his D1SC, with a 3340 race weight, backed with a 3;70 gear ration and a Th400, cuts 1.3 60 times. The car sounds stock besides the blower wine and the bypass valve .
On my 383 I was thinking something with a 6 degree split with as much lift as I can throw at it using the stiffer big block Beehives. I firgure with boost running through the motor these springs would be my best choice.
When it comes to LSA at boost I have heard just about everything some wider than 114 and some narrower.

DO you car to GIVE A LITTLE BIT of FREE INFORMATION!
Ben,

The LSA is not the really important part, it's the valve events. If you don't have the intake events in the right spot then the cam isin't going to work. The large LSA's are there not to trap the charge, but to keep the motor driveable and enough idle vacuum. Low compression and off boost are two things that make for a crappy driving car.

The split all depends on the setup, but blowers do need more time (duration) to effectively make power in the higher RPM of the range you are running. That goes for both LS and LT motors.

Bret
Old 04-06-2006, 01:43 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So I Should Just Keep My Cam??
Old 04-06-2006, 02:38 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

T/A KID, you cant compare LS1 to LT1. The LS1s always use cams with less split due to the exhaust side of the head being alot better than the comparable LT1. That is why LS1s could get away with reverse split pattern cams.

The LT1s need more exhaust duration than the LS1s.
Jason I understand when looking at the LS1 and LT1 we look more at the stock style flow characteristics. FWIW, LT1's in stock form have crappy I/E flow ratio on the heads, thats why people run cams like the CC306 (with 14 degree I/E splits) they need the extra duration on the exhuast. Once the these motors are modded they don't exaclty fit the regular Lt1 characteristics anymore IMO. For example you take into account an LE2 head that flows 268/190 with a ported LT1 intake, Once the intake is bolted to the heads that flow number is 235/240CFM and once the header is placed on the exhuast if flows 200/205. That is a 70%+ I/E ratio on the heads,in my opinion you need a cam with a very small Split, say like a 228/232, instead of a cam with a huge 12-14 degree spilt.

Ben,

The LSA is not the really important part, it's the valve events. If you don't have the intake events in the right spot then the cam isin't going to work. The large LSA's are there not to trap the charge, but to keep the motor driveable and enough idle vacuum. Low compression and off boost are two things that make for a crappy driving car.

The split all depends on the setup, but blowers do need more time (duration) to effectively make power in the higher RPM of the range you are running. That goes for both LS and LT motors.
Bret how do you exactly setup the valve events to be optimum for a setup, intake opening and closing, etc??
I had talked to Lloyd one day about cams and he said a lot of what you guys do is mess with the valve events, Is that half the battle.
Bret the AFR's that I had LE send you are the heads I am using for my D1SC 383, I measured around a 80% I/E ratio on the heads 288/216 at .600.

Do blower cars need a wider duration split, Even when the heads are in the 80%+ I/E ratio??
Lastly Bret I am trying to put together a very driveable street car with this setup, I want to go mild on the cam and not have very much Overlap, can having not enough overlap hurt performance or driveability on a Blower car.
The main reason I canceled the 396, super vic, 7000 RPM motor is I thought I would have more fun and DRIVEABILITY with a charger. I drive this car everyday.
Thanks for any advice.
Old 04-10-2006, 07:50 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ben,

Actually in the running condition of a LT1 motor the E/I ratio is around 80-85%

FWIW the E/I ratio is not as big of a deal as most put on it, but with tweaking that you can get better power and drivability.

Overlap on a blower car is important, not as much so as a NA car, but it doesn't hurt like blower guys think it does.

How driveable do you want it? I've been test driving a setup that I have in the shop on a LS1 car with a mail order tune from Bryan and that setup is not bad at all. Nice on the highway, with just low speed bucking, and we are talking about a cam with more overlap than a MS3 cam.

Bret

.
Old 04-11-2006, 02:05 PM
  #28  
Launching!
 
hammrman31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94'BLKBRD
So I Should Just Keep My Cam??
listen to Bret. he knows his stuff. you have a good opertunity to have a cam that will work with your combo.
Old 04-11-2006, 02:23 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

How driveable do you want it? I've been test driving a setup that I have in the shop on a LS1 car with a mail order tune from Bryan and that setup is not bad at all. Nice on the highway, with just low speed bucking, and we are talking about a cam with more overlap than a MS3 cam.
I just looked up the specs of the MS3 (magic stick 3 from Texas speed and Performance) its a 237or 238/242 with around .602 .608 lift on a 113. Funny thing is my Buddy has that same cam in his Stock bottom end Ls1, 4.33 gears, 4000 stall, car was dyno tuned, hit 393RWHP and runs the 1/8 at 7.05. I don't really like the way his car drives to be honest I would definatly need something tamer. But I know the more CUBES (346 VS 383 ) will tame a bigger cam and I have actually heard Blowers tame a cam somewhat?

Bret I can't recall how to Figure in the Overlap of a cam. A guy on this board ran a 224/230 cam on a 112 LSA and his LT1 traped 140+ with his blower and still had Less Overlap than a 224/236 on a 114 LSA.
Old 04-11-2006, 03:02 PM
  #30  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yep....

If you look a the cam in terms of intake and opening numbers you just take the Intake opening point and the exhaust closing point and add those numbers together, that will get you the overlap at .050" duration or advertised duration.

With less compression the cam gets worse to drive so that's one problem with blower setups. The big issue I have found with most blower cams is the placement of the valve events. There was a good article on cam swaps in a blown motor that Mike Petralia did for Engine Masters last summer/fall time. I wish he would have called me up (since I know him pretty well) and asked for a cam, he FOUND something there, he just didn't come up with the right conclusion, actually the best test i've seen in a magazine on camshafts.

Bret



Quick Reply: What Cam For My Forged 383??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.