underdrive pulley's worth the$???
who's right? and who's wrong? I'm working on every possible way for 400rwhp (far fetched... perhaps. impossible... no) and didn't know if they made any gain what so ever.
ALSO, should I buy the cheap ones that has the crank pulley that goes in behind the balancer and then put the balancer on after? or an "underdrive" balancer?
I know a boy with a '97 model T/A that put the cheap ones on, and FORGOT to put the balancer back on, needless to say the timing chain broke and bent a few valves, and wore the main bearings a little weird: all with 27k miles on the clock.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
with my heads, a comp #501 cam (212/218) on 1.6's (.523/.528") and a 4L60E and a 3.23 gear with all the supporting intake/exhaust stuff. I made 352rwhp/371ft.lbs.
since then:
comp #503 cam, cloyes double roller (no water pump gear) CSR electric water pump, as well as a t56. I figure with less drivetrain loss with the 6spd, roller timing set, and no water pump drag, as well as the much needed breathing from the bigger cam, and a dyno tune? I may cut it close, 380rwhp is more believable, I know; but if there's just a few more things I could do to put it at the 400 mark would be great. damn, knew I shoulda done a 3-angle valve job!
with my heads, a comp #501 cam (212/218) on 1.6's (.523/.528") and a 4L60E and a 3.23 gear with all the supporting intake/exhaust stuff. I made 352rwhp/371ft.lbs.
since then:
comp #503 cam, cloyes double roller (no water pump gear) CSR electric water pump, as well as a t56. I figure with less drivetrain loss with the 6spd, roller timing set, and no water pump drag, as well as the much needed breathing from the bigger cam, and a dyno tune? I may cut it close, 380rwhp is more believable, I know; but if there's just a few more things I could do to put it at the 400 mark would be great. damn, knew I shoulda done a 3-angle valve job!
balancer or just pulley? which is better?
balancer or just pulley? which is better?





