NOT an LT1 Vs LS1 Thread.
LT1's push Tq more effortlessly, at lower RPMS.
Yes the LS1 peaks more Tq, but it needs to be revved.
The LT1 has 325 Tq ( give or take) @ 2400 ( around there ).
So thats why it feels snappy. And its one of the things I love about my LT1. Effortless power.
http://www.hypertech.com/get_dynocha...1379987&tp=pdf
http://community.webshots.com/photo/...41256754yiNDDP
Please tell me AT WHAT POINT the LT1 has more tq than the LS1? I used to own an LT1 and rode in a friends LS1...wow...sorry, not happening. (I am sorry the LS1 graph is from hypertech, but the #'s for stock look accurate to me)
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The LS1 body style is more...Uhh slippery. FlAmE suit on.

The real LS1 advantages lie with the heads, intake and distributer-less ignition. Bigger flow makes bigger HP especially at higher RPM.

( j/k stanger you know its all good. )
Actually before I bought my 95, I test drove a 98 with my then Gf. She thought the LT1 had more ***** because it has kind of a low end grunt to it.
Anyone who owns both will tell you the same.
I have a dyno graph of an LT1 puttin down 290, give or take,
I have a dyno graph of an LS1 puttin down 310, give or take,
Thing is, the LT1's Torque curve starts earlier than the LS1, although the LS1 does make as much/if not more Tq.
That advanced headflow design is most potent as High rpms, and anyone will tell you that.
Although, thats a good thing.
LS1s are too expensive to justify the power, I'm happy with my cheaper than **** LT1.






