Mac 2002 SS

iTrader: (6)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 95 Formula:
<strong>I'm running a cam motion solidin my 355. 255/263 657/628 on a 110LS. It surges alittle below 1800 but is still very drivable in my opinion. A daily driver...no..but a fun weekend car. The idle is choppy but not as bad as you would think with the size of the cam.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sweeet !! Man, that cam seems to be a "Beast" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . That seems to be right up my alley <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> !! By the way 95 Formula, what kind of heads are you running and valve size ?

95 Formula

iTrader: (2)

I'm running Ported lt1 heads with 2.0 1.57 valves. I like my cam, took some tuning to get everything right and I'm sure I could tune out the drivability too. I just haven't been real worried about that part of it. I have tuned my setup to work very well together, it likes to be shifted at 6900 and I have 4.71s and run a 28" tire. You could get away with less gear if you run a smaller tire. Its a beast from 3200 on up. The low end torque is what suprised me. Here is a dyno sheet if your interested. As you can see I still had some tuning to get my torque curve smoothed out some. It was alittle lean down bottom. This was through a moser 9" and 4.57 gears.

http://www.geocities.com/herrint/dyno427.jpg

Tim

<small>[ November 08, 2002, 12:50 PM: Message edited by: 95 Formula ]</small>

YBIRD

I also just got a cam-motions cam. It's for a 385ci with stock ported heads and stock ported intake. Specs are:
245/253
613/622@.50
112center