A4 > M6 Swap
Whats your setup, how much power, whats your expectations of the car, and do you care about O/D??
Trending Topics

was the swap a hard long involved surgery?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Strip= A4
That pretty much sums it up imo.
An automatic is ideal for the strip, just not the 4L60E.
Ask anyone who runs better than 12's with a 4L60 how often it breaks on them.
Really though, Ive burnt 4 'built' 4l60's from 3 diff company's with a stock LT1 w/ full exhaust, powerdyne @ 6psi, and a tune making no more than 365rwhp. All of these were 'guaranteed' to 6-700hp.
To avoid a flame fest, I'll omit the names of these companies. But they are all names passed around here frequently. The last company I used was the only one to honor their 1yr warranty and rebuild it for me. But it broke again within 1 month and they refused to fix it again, even though I was only 4 months into the warranty.
If you want to RELIABLY go 12's or better, you need to look toward a different transmission. 4L80E, TH400, TH350, glide, etc., or even a 6spd if your not worried about consistancy.

I'l cut-n-paste it here for your reading pleasure:
The reason many shops rate their transmissions by HP, is because they've reached a common failure point that they can't manage to overcome.
I still can't believe how many posts I read about repeated burnt 2/4 band and 3/4 clutch failures I see. We solved those issues many many years ago. At one time, we had narrowed down our 4L60E's "weakest link" to the output shaft itself. With the release of the hardened 4L65E output shaft a few years ago, we haven't broke any since then.
Yes, we've had 4L60E's break parts over the years. When you find a weak link, you find/make better parts to fix that weak area. At this point, I feel as though we've solved all the problem/weak areas in the '60E.
Too many people get hung up on HP. What we've seen to be harder on '60E's are sub 1.6X 60 ft. times. A 400 HP car that 60's a 1.50 is much harder on a '60E than a 600 HP car that 60's a 1.70. It all depends on WHERE that power is made. Obviously a turbo/blower car is going to be easier on the launch than a car coming out on a 200 shot.
Unfortunately, 4L60E's still have a bad reputation of being weak. This is in part due to too many builders THINKING they can build them...LOL I see customers that have paid close to $3000 for a '60E. They thought they were getting the best. Judging from alot of what I've seen, too many builders just "miss the boat". When that expensive "Race" transmission bites the dust in a short period of time, the customer tends to blame the transmission. We've proven it's not the transmissions fault.
We still see other "Pro Shops" use antiquated parts and build techniques, such as vacuum modulators, kevlar bands, red 3-4 clutches, Trans Go kits, "Load Release" springs, etc. I love the challenge of a customer saying, "I've had this transmission built 4-5-6-7 times and it won't last!" We like changing those customers opinions...Once they have one built correctly.
If a builder wants to build a transmission with a vacuum modulator, they should stick to transmissions for 1975 Caprices. They simply don't belong/work in a '60E. Any "Old School" racers here? When you built a radical street machine with either a TH350 or a TH400 in it, what was one of the big transmission mods? When you go with a big cam, or forced induction, you usually had to go with a manual valvebody. That's because the vacuum modulators these transmissions came factory equipped with just couldn't accurately control them. So now we have misinformed builders putting something in a 4L60E that didn't work 20 years ago? There's no way a modulator will ever control pressure as precisely or quickly as a computer/electronic solenoid.
I hope this helps clear up the "How much will your transmission take" questions. We'll let you know when we reach a limiting factor that we can't improve on.
Thank You,
Frank
CPT
An automatic is ideal for the strip, just not the 4L60E.
Ask anyone who runs better than 12's with a 4L60 how often it breaks on them.
Like I said that was my opinion.
I'l cut-n-paste it here for your reading pleasure:
Whats interesting to me is that EVERY single 'pro' builder out there says the same thing. They all have the 'tricks' to make them hold up. And they ALL only talk about HP limits and/or 1/4mile performance. None recognize that a 400hp engine in a 3700# F-body, no matter the 60', is gonna be harder on the trans than a 400hp car in a 2800# car cutting better 60's. Weight is a HUGE factor in the durability of these things, and with the F-body weight is a big factor that simply cannot be completely solved.
I agree that some people may be able to get them to hold more power than someone else... Due to knowledge and skill. But the same parts are available to every builder, so is the same information. Its the builders translation of the information available to him that makes the difference.
One thing I agree on in that 'article' is to stay away from vacuum modulators. They really do not work that well, especially on FI cars that only produce vacuum at idle. The first 'built' 60E I bought had a vacuum modulator and it was horrible. I think I got 4 months outta that one.
Try and get 95+ T56s.
The early years, the T56s moved around companys, until finaly Tremec bought them.
In 93' they were called m29s, they had different gear ratios then later t56s.
Tony.
Bryan



