Z06 maf
Z06 maf what exactly is the advantage of switching to the Z06 maf? will it be better for tuning or just the same? is it just the size that makes the difference or what. just looking for info for now.
Originally Posted by borninatransam
what exactly is the advantage of switching to the Z06 maf? will it be better for tuning or just the same? is it just the size that makes the difference or what. just looking for info for now.
You will have to get the Maf, jumper harness, and change the Maf tables in the tune to reflect the Z06 Maff. I had one a few years ago...did not gain much over the stock one.
It reads at a higher resolution but is capable of a wider range of frequency than the LT1 pcm so it poses some issues once you make enough power to actually benifit from it. Can be tuned it is just more work pas that point.
Our pcm can not understand it beyond 360gps of airflow to put that into perspective my car exceeds that number and I run a stock shortblock yet.
Once I learn more in tuning I MIGHT try this again(tried when they first came out and gave up) the increased resolution down low should mean a slight improvement in response and drivability, maybe even economy but once you get past 360gps you have to tune it like speed density, completely doable but more work.
Our pcm can not understand it beyond 360gps of airflow to put that into perspective my car exceeds that number and I run a stock shortblock yet.
Once I learn more in tuning I MIGHT try this again(tried when they first came out and gave up) the increased resolution down low should mean a slight improvement in response and drivability, maybe even economy but once you get past 360gps you have to tune it like speed density, completely doable but more work.
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Our pcm can not understand it beyond 360gps of airflow to put that into perspective my car exceeds that number and I run a stock shortblock yet.
.
.
They can if you know how to do it.
Originally Posted by Ed Wright
They can if you know how to do it.
What is the max you can get it to understand??
Any corrections on my other statements far as potential for better drivability and such?
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Oh really, you have my interest.
What is the max you can get it to understand??
Any corrections on my other statements far as potential for better drivability and such?
What is the max you can get it to understand??
Any corrections on my other statements far as potential for better drivability and such?
Was yours setting the MAF code, or injector pulse width cutting back to 15 mili/sec?
To answer the other gentleman: When mine was making 460, and up until 500 rwhp the 85mm "Z06" MAF was worth almost 5 rwhp over a stock 3 1/2" unit with the screen removed. I have been running mine Speed Density for over 2 years now, and after 500 rwhp that was worth about 4 more rwhp. Last pull with mine a few weeks ago (after new rings and springs) mine made 532 through the mufflers.
Take care, Ed
I tried the ZO6 MAF early on with the L99 so it was only moving like 220gps max as seen on the stock MAF which I though was bad hence the ZO6 attempt at replacing it. One of my early mistakes when I kept throwing parts at the car instead of real diagnosis. The MAF was not the problem and BH could not get the ZO6 MAF tuned right at that time(years ago), had black smoke out the tailpipe under throttle, milage was crap.
Sounds like I might be able to gain a few hp with one, not enough to make it worthwhile from that perspective, but can I get you to comment on any potential drivability gains from the higher resolution??? If I can get 3rwhp and some drivability gains I might just try it again.
Sounds like I might be able to gain a few hp with one, not enough to make it worthwhile from that perspective, but can I get you to comment on any potential drivability gains from the higher resolution??? If I can get 3rwhp and some drivability gains I might just try it again.
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
I tried the ZO6 MAF early on with the L99 so it was only moving like 220gps max as seen on the stock MAF which I though was bad hence the ZO6 attempt at replacing it. One of my early mistakes when I kept throwing parts at the car instead of real diagnosis. The MAF was not the problem and BH could not get the ZO6 MAF tuned right at that time(years ago), had black smoke out the tailpipe under throttle, milage was crap.
Sounds like I might be able to gain a few hp with one, not enough to make it worthwhile from that perspective, but can I get you to comment on any potential drivability gains from the higher resolution??? If I can get 3rwhp and some drivability gains I might just try it again.
Sounds like I might be able to gain a few hp with one, not enough to make it worthwhile from that perspective, but can I get you to comment on any potential drivability gains from the higher resolution??? If I can get 3rwhp and some drivability gains I might just try it again.
